Corporate Crime Database Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Corporate Crime Database Act adds a new corporate-crime database duty to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. It defines corporate offenses as federal-law violations or alleged violations committed by a business entity, or by an employee acting within the employee's occupational role, plus other violations the BJS Director determines to be corporate offenses. Enforcement actions include concluded administrative, civil, or criminal actions as well as declinations, settlements, deferred prosecution agreements, and non-prosecution agreements. Within one year, the Director must collect, aggregate, analyze, and publish a public internet database of federal enforcement actions involving corporate offenses. The database must list each business entity or individual identified, relevant employers and parent companies, offense type, violated statutes or regulations, each federal agency bringing the action, outcomes and relevant documentation, unique identifiers, and any additional information the Director determines necessary. Within 180 days, BJS must issue guidance telling federal agencies which information to submit and how often. The database must include available historical and future enforcement actions and must be searchable, downloadable, and publicly accessible. BJS must update it each time new information is collected and submit annual reports to Congress analyzing recidivism, offenses, enforcement actions, estimated victim and public impact, and recommendations developed with the Attorney General. The bill also directs federal information policy work to improve collection, digitization, tabulation, sharing, publishing, and standardization of corporate-offense data.
Who Benefits and How
Consumers and victims of corporate offenses benefit from easier access to federal enforcement histories and outcomes. Corporate accountability researchers benefit from downloadable data linking companies, parent companies, statutes, agencies, and outcomes. Federal enforcement agencies benefit from standardized reporting guidance for corporate-offense actions. Congressional oversight committees benefit from annual BJS reports on recidivism, public impact, and deterrence recommendations.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Bureau of Justice Statistics Director must build, update, analyze, and publish the corporate-crime database. Federal agencies bringing enforcement actions must submit information under BJS guidance. Business entities and parent companies named in enforcement actions face increased public visibility. Attorney General must consult on recommendations for improving monitoring, response, and deterrence.
Key Provisions
- Creates a Bureau of Justice Statistics corporate-crime database within one year.
- Requires data on business entities, employees, parent companies, offenses, statutes, agencies, outcomes, and identifiers.
- Requires BJS guidance within 180 days for federal agency information submissions.
- Requires the database to be searchable, downloadable, publicly accessible, and updated when information is collected.
- Requires annual reports on recidivism, victim impact, public impact, and enforcement recommendations.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires the Bureau of Justice Statistics to build a searchable, downloadable public corporate-crime database covering federal enforcement actions, settlements, deferred prosecution agreements, non-prosecution agreements, declinations, identified business entities, employees, parent companies, statutes, agencies, outcomes, identifiers, and annual reports on recidivism, victim impact, and deterrence recommendations.
Key Policy Areas
Criminal Justice, Corporate Accountability, Government Data
Primary Purpose
Requires the Bureau of Justice Statistics to build a searchable, downloadable public corporate-crime database covering federal enforcement actions, settlements, deferred prosecution agreements, non-prosecution agreements, declinations, identified business entities, employees, parent companies, statutes, agencies, outcomes, identifiers, and annual reports on recidivism, victim impact, and deterrence recommendations.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Consumers
- Corporate offense victims
- Corporate accountability researchers
- Federal enforcement agencies
- Congressional oversight committees
Identified Costs
- Bureau of Justice Statistics Director
- Federal agencies
- Business entities
- Parent companies
- Attorney General
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMs. Scanlon (for herself, Ms. Norton, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, …
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition …
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Bureau of Justice Statistics Director, Federal agencies
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology