Fix Our Forests Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Fix Our Forests Act would establish a joint Forest Service and U.S. Geological Survey Fireshed Center and designate priority landscapes using wildfire exposure to communities, water supplies and forests. States and Indian Tribes could request shared stewardship agreements, followed by joint assessments and public strategies. Designation and assessment themselves would be exempt from NEPA; covered treatment projects would gain emergency procedures and access to specified categorical exclusions. Several existing exclusion size limits would increase to 10,000 acres. This is not a blanket repeal of environmental law: statutory eligibility, forest-plan limits and restrictions on timber harvesting still matter. Some emergency procedures defer rather than eliminate consultation.
The bill also narrows lawsuits challenging fireshed projects, generally requiring suit within 120 days, preserving shorter existing deadlines and imposing comment-participation conditions when a comment period was offered. Courts could halt or vacate action only under demanding environmental-harm and remedy conditions; otherwise relief would generally be a remand of no more than 180 days. Separate provisions expand relief from reopening forest-plan endangered-species consultation, including when new information reveals previously unconsidered effects. Other titles support wildfire-resistant communities, utility maintenance, seed supplies, biochar, technology testing, white oak restoration and a casualty-assistance program for firefighter families. Many, but not all, new authorities expire after seven years. The bill has not enacted these programs merely by passing the House.
Who Benefits and How
Residents of high-risk communities and water users could benefit from targeted fuel treatments, home-hardening assistance and watershed restoration, although actual risk reduction depends on project design and implementation. Forest restoration contractors and forest-products providers gain opportunities through longer stewardship contracts, broader good-neighbor work and easier timber-sale procedures. Electric utility providers gain faster vegetation-plan decisions, a new categorical exclusion and authority to remove corridor trees without a separate timber-sale contract. State governments and Tribal governments gain shared planning and restoration roles. Biochar producers, tree nursery providers, research institutions and white oak landowners can receive demonstration, research or technical-assistance opportunities, subject to applicable funding conditions. The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation is designated to administer the white oak grant program. Next-of-kin of covered firefighters and wildland support personnel gain travel-reimbursement and case-management assistance, without changing existing line-of-duty death-benefit authorities.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Geological Survey and Department of the Interior must undertake substantial mapping, coordination, reporting, contract and program administration. Litigants challenging fireshed decisions face shorter filing windows, issue-preservation requirements and restricted court remedies. Conservation organizations and people relying on habitat or historic-resource protection may have fewer opportunities for advance review, even where faster treatments reduce other wildfire risks. Electric utility providers must remit any proceeds from sales of corridor trees to the Forest Service after transportation costs, not keep unrestricted timber revenue. Longer stewardship contracts require a 10% contract-amount payment if the agency cancels or terminates qualifying new contracts lasting more than five years. That creates federal fiscal exposure but is not an automatic upfront payment. The bill extends authorizations, including $90 million annually for Joint Chiefs restoration through FY2030 and $80 million annually for Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration in FY2025-2030; these are not appropriations or guaranteed awards. Several programs expressly depend on funds being appropriated in advance.
Key Provisions
- Establishes a public Fireshed Registry, risk assessments and shared stewardship agreements; initially includes designated 2022 strategy landscapes and the highest-risk fifth of the 2019 fireshed dataset, with periodic updates and a seven-year subtitle sunset.
- Expands specified treatment categorical exclusions to 10,000 acres and makes emergency review procedures available, while preserving the exclusions' own eligibility rules and applicable land-use limits.
- Restricts litigation over fireshed projects and broadens forest-plan consultation exceptions. Existing law already has narrower new-listing exceptions, so this is not the first such exception and does not expressly abolish project-specific ESA consultation.
- Extends the general stewardship-contract ceiling from 10 to 20 years and requires 10% cancellation or termination compensation for qualifying new contracts over five years. Existing special 20-year stewardship authority and separate long-term timber-sale law remain distinct.
- Raises the timber-sale advertising exception threshold from $10,000 to $55,000, with annual inflation adjustment starting January 1, 2027; expands good-neighbor partners and eligible revenue uses through October 1, 2030.
- Authorizes utility hazard-tree assessment within 150 feet instead of 10 feet, automatic approval after 120 days only for unmodified vegetation plans, and a categorical exclusion with wilderness and road-construction safeguards.
- Requires accurate completed-acre reporting without counting the same treated acre more than once per fiscal year; provides technology demonstrations and studies, not automatic purchases or a mandatory Forest Service headquarters move.
- Creates biochar demonstrations with a 35% federal capital-cost ceiling and a practicable 50% qualifying-feedstock requirement. The House removes carbon-sequestration selection priority but retains carbon research.
- Establishes white oak pilot projects, voluntary grants administered by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, nursery-capacity planning and Tribal or university research partnerships; requires no net increase in federal staffing for the main oak program.
- Requires a Wildland Fire Management Casualty Assistance Program within six months, including family travel reimbursement, benefits information and case management, without replacing existing death benefits.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Accelerate forest and utility-corridor wildfire treatments through risk-based firesheds, expanded categorical exclusions, longer contracts and restricted judicial remedies, while supporting community protection, reforestation, white oak recovery, research and firefighter families.
Key Policy Areas
Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Emergency Management
Primary Purpose
Accelerate forest and utility-corridor wildfire treatments through risk-based firesheds, expanded categorical exclusions, longer contracts and restricted judicial remedies, while supporting community protection, reforestation, white oak recovery, research and firefighter families.
Policy Domains
Fix Our Forests Act
Identified Gains
- Residents of high-risk wildfire communities
- Forest restoration contractors
- Electric utility providers
- State governments
- Tribal governments
- Biochar producers
- Tree nursery providers
- National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
- Next-of-kin of covered firefighters
Identified Costs
- Forest Service
- Bureau of Land Management
- U.S. Geological Survey
- Department of the Interior
- Litigants challenging fireshed management projects
- Conservation organizations
- Electric utility providers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed HouseCommittee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Subcommittee on Conservation, Forestry, …
Received in the Senate.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 279 - …
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas …
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H346-347)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. …
The House adopted the amendments en gros as agreed to …
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Bureau of Land Management, County governments, Department of Agriculture
Bureau of Land Management, Department of Agriculture, Department of Energy, Department of the Interior, Forest Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, State governments, Tribal governments face effects in multiple directions
Positive-direction: Local fire departments, Special district governments
Negative-direction: Department of Defense, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Fireshed Center, Government Accountability Office, National Wildfire Coordinating Group, U.S. Geological Survey
Communities using wildfire risk information, Community members using non-English meeting information, Conservation organizations reviewing forest treatments
Positive-direction: Communities using wildfire risk information, Community members using non-English meeting information, Downstream water users, Next-of-kin of covered firefighters, Next-of-kin of covered wildland support personnel, Participating adjacent watershed landowners, Private landowners participating in landscape restoration, Private white oak landowners, Researchers at eligible land-grant colleges, Residents exposed to structure wildfire risk, Residents exposed to wildfire in treatment areas, Residents of designated high-risk firesheds, Residents of fireshed management areas, Residents of high-risk wildfire communities, Residents of wildland-urban interface communities, Taxpayers evaluating wildfire treatment performance, Watershed communities eligible for restoration projects, White oak forest landowners, White oak restoration grant participants, Wildland firefighters
Negative-direction: Conservation organizations reviewing forest treatments, Conservation organizations seeking plan-level species review, Litigants challenging fireshed management projects, Participants in environmental review of fireshed assessments, Participants in environmental review of fireshed designations, Participants in environmental review of utility vegetation plans
Contractors implementing fireshed projects, Contractors seeking future fireshed program work, Forest restoration contractors
Positive-direction: Contractors implementing fireshed projects, Forest restoration contractors, Landscape restoration service providers, Long-term forest stewardship contractors, Reforestation service providers, White oak restoration service providers
Negative-direction: Contractors seeking future fireshed program work
Fire-resistant building material researchers, Wildfire modeling technology providers, Wildfire technology providers
Tree nursery providers, White oak nursery providers
Biochar demonstration applicants emphasizing carbon sequestration, Biochar producers, Forest-products infrastructure providers
Positive-direction: Biochar producers, Forest-products infrastructure providers
Negative-direction: Biochar demonstration applicants emphasizing carbon sequestration
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "director"
- → Director of the new Fireshed Center, not a generic bureau director
- "the_secretary"
- → Secretary of Agriculture unless expressly qualified or inside an amended statute with its own actor definition
- "the_secretaries"
- → Secretary of Agriculture and Secretary of the Interior
- "secretary_concerned"
- → Agriculture for National Forest System land; Interior for Bureau of Land Management public lands
- "director"
- → Fireshed Center Director; Forest Service or U.S. Geological Survey employee
- "governor"
- → State governor, Puerto Rico governor or Tribal chief executive as defined
- "the_secretaries"
- → Agriculture and Interior
- "court"
- → Federal court reviewing a covered fireshed action
- "secretary_concerned"
- → Agriculture for National Forest System land; Interior for BLM land
- "section206_lead"
- → Secretary of the Interior, with unqualified Secretary drafting ambiguity
- "the_secretaries"
- → Agriculture and Interior
- "section205_partner"
- → Secretary of Defense
- "comptroller_general"
- → Government Accountability Office
- "covered_secretaries"
- → Agriculture, Interior and Energy in section301
- "section303_coordinator"
- → National Wildfire Coordinating Group
- "coalition"
- → White Oak Restoration Initiative Coalition
- "foundation"
- → National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
- "the_secretary"
- → Agriculture except express Interior references; section313 mixed wording is unresolved
- "lead"
- → Secretary of the Interior
- "data_partners"
- → U.S. Fire Administration and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
- "liaison_partners"
- → Department of Justice and Social Security Administration
Note: Sections206 and313 expressly assign Interior-led restoration work but then use unqualified Secretary, defined globally as Agriculture. Preserve the ambiguity in subsidiary reports, contracting or implementation rather than silently treating every reference as Interior.
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
A landscape-scale area with shared wildfire exposure, potentially spanning ownerships; hazardous-fuels work includes mechanical treatments, logging, prescribed or cultural fire, and grazing, not only emergency fire suppression.
2022 Wildfire Crisis Strategy landscapes plus top 20% of the 7,688 firesheds in the 2019 Forest Service assessment ranked using specified community, water and forest-conversion risks; designations may include non-Federal and Tribal land without conveying ownership.
New agreements or contracts lasting more than five years must provide 10% of the agreement or contract amount upon agency cancellation or termination. General ceiling rises to 20 years; special existing authorities are not newly created.
Agency action carrying out a section106 fireshed project and related implementing actions; judicial limits are not limited to NEPA causes of action and are not complete immunity.
Automatic approval after 120 days applies to submitted plans without modifications; modified plans require a deficiency letter at 120 days and completed review within 165 days.
Agriculture, Interior and Energy for demonstrations; Interior consults Energy for research. Carbon sequestration remains an authorized research subject despite removal of its demonstration-selection priority.
Highest available category: legal spouse, adult children by age, parents with specified custody/adoption precedence, adult siblings by age, grandparents, then other relatives under the specified domicile-law rule.
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology