To require asylum officers at United States embassies and consulates to conduct credible fear screenings before aliens seeking asylum may be permitted to enter the United States to apply for asylum, and for other purposes.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill provides asylum interviews Notwithstanding section 235(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C, requires asylum ineligibility Section 208(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C, and requires criminal bench warrants Each Federal judicial district shall appoint at least 1 magistrate or district court judge who, upon a showing of probable cause, shall issue a warrant of arrest for a violation. It relies on compliance mandates, appropriations, and exemptions. The main policy areas are Foreign Affairs, Civil Rights, Foreign Policy, and Criminal Justice.
Who Benefits and How
Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could face reduced risk, Veterans and VA beneficiaries affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens, and Transportation operators and users affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties, Immigrants, asylum seekers, and border communities affected by the bill would take on compliance duties, and Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Provides asylum interviews Notwithstanding section 235(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
- Requires asylum ineligibility Section 208(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
- Requires criminal bench warrants Each Federal judicial district shall appoint at least 1 magistrate or district court judge who, upon a showing of probable cause, shall issue a warrant of arrest for a violation...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill provides asylum interviews Notwithstanding section 235(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C, requires asylum ineligibility Section 208(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C, and requires criminal bench warrants Each Federal judicial district shall appoint at least 1 magistrate or district court judge who, upon a showing of probable cause, shall issue a warrant of arrest for a violation.
Key Policy Areas
Foreign Affairs, Civil Rights, Foreign Policy, Criminal Justice
Primary Purpose
The bill provides asylum interviews Notwithstanding section 235(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C, requires asylum ineligibility Section 208(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C, and requires criminal bench warrants Each Federal judicial district shall appoint at least 1 magistrate or district court judge who, upon a showing of probable cause, shall issue a warrant of arrest for a violation.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
- Veterans and VA beneficiaries affected by the bill
- Transportation operators and users affected by the bill
- Immigrants, asylum seekers, and border communities affected by the bill
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
- Immigrants, asylum seekers, and border communities affected by the bill
- Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities
- Foreign affairs agencies and foreign-policy stakeholders affected by the bill
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Hern introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology