HR4638-119

Passed House

Federal Working Animal Protection Act

119th Congress Introduced Jul 23, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Federal Working Animal Protection Act, also known as the BOWOW Act, amends two parts of the Immigration and Nationality Act. First, it adds a new inadmissibility ground in INA section 212(a)(2) for any noncitizen who has been convicted of, admits to committing, or admits the essential elements of an offense under 18 U.S.C. 1368, the federal criminal statute covering harm to animals used in law enforcement. Second, it adds a matching deportability ground in INA section 237(a)(2) for the same conduct after a noncitizen has been admitted to the United States.

The bill does not create a new criminal offense by itself. The legal mechanism is immigration enforcement: a 18 U.S.C. 1368 conviction or qualifying admission becomes a basis for denying admission, denying visa eligibility, or initiating removal. That gives immigration officers, consular officers, and immigration judges a new statutory hook tied to the protection of law-enforcement working animals.

Who Benefits and How

Federal law enforcement K-9 units, federal mounted law enforcement units, local law enforcement agencies that work with federal immigration partners, and prosecutors handling 18 U.S.C. 1368 cases benefit because the bill increases the immigration consequences attached to harming law-enforcement working animals. DHS removal officers and consular officers receive clearer statutory authority to screen or pursue cases when the relevant conviction or admission exists.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Noncitizens convicted under 18 U.S.C. 1368 and noncitizens admitting conduct under that statute bear the largest burden because they must face a new statutory inadmissibility or deportability ground, may lose admission eligibility, and may be placed in removal proceedings. Immigration judges, DHS removal officers, USCIS adjudicators, consular officers, and immigration defense attorneys must evaluate conviction records, file or defend immigration charges, prove whether an admission satisfies the statutory elements, and comply with the new screening rule when the underlying conduct is raised in immigration proceedings.

Key Provisions

  • Adds a new INA inadmissibility ground for noncitizens convicted under 18 U.S.C. 1368.
  • Adds inadmissibility for noncitizens who admit committing, or admit essential elements of, a 18 U.S.C. 1368 offense.
  • Adds a matching INA deportability ground for noncitizens admitted to the United States.
  • Creates an immigration-enforcement consequence tied to harming animals used in law enforcement.
  • Gives DHS officers, consular officers, and immigration judges a specific statutory basis for screening and removal decisions involving 18 U.S.C. 1368 conduct.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Adds immigration consequences for noncitizens convicted of, or admitting conduct constituting, harming animals used in law enforcement by making those noncitizens inadmissible and deportable under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Key Policy Areas

Immigration, Law Enforcement, Criminal Justice

Primary Purpose

Adds immigration consequences for noncitizens convicted of, or admitting conduct constituting, harming animals used in law enforcement by making those noncitizens inadmissible and deportable under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Policy Domains

Immigration Law Enforcement Criminal Justice

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Federal law enforcement K-9 units
  • Federal mounted law enforcement units
  • DHS removal officers
  • Consular officers
  • Local law enforcement agencies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Consular officers: ,
DHS removal officers: ,
Local law enforcement agencies: ,
Federal law enforcement K-9 units: ,
Federal mounted law enforcement units: ,
Identified Costs
  • Noncitizens convicted under 18 U.S.C. 1368
  • Noncitizens admitting conduct under 18 U.S.C. 1368
  • Immigration judges
  • USCIS adjudicators
  • Immigration defense attorneys
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Immigration judges: ,
USCIS adjudicators: ,
Immigration defense attorneys: ,
Noncitizens convicted under 18 U.S.C. 1368: ,
Noncitizens admitting conduct under 18 U.S.C. 1368: ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 19, 2026

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Mar 19, 2026

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Mar 19, 2026

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 228 - …

Mar 19, 2026

Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1115. (consideration: …

Mar 19, 2026

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 228 - …

Mar 19, 2026

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Mar 19, 2026

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas …

Mar 19, 2026

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Mar 19, 2026

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Mar 17, 2026

Rule H. Res. 1115 passed House.

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
9 mentions across 3 clauses
-9 negative

Consular officers, Department of Homeland Security removal officers, Immigration judges

Immigrant Communities
6 mentions across 3 clauses
-6 negative

Noncitizens admitting conduct under 18 U.S.C. 1368, Noncitizens convicted under 18 U.S.C. 1368

Law Enforcement
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+6 positive

Federal law enforcement K-9 units, Federal mounted law enforcement units

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration Law Enforcement Criminal Justice
Actor Mappings
"ina"
→ Immigration and Nationality Act
"secretary"
→ Secretary of Homeland Security

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology