HR4602-119

In Committee

Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act

119th Congress Introduced Jul 22, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act amends the State Justice Institute Act. It defines an eligible organization as a national nonprofit with technical assistance and training expertise in state and local judicial security, courthouse design and security standards, state judicial operations and public access, and experience with trial, appellate, rural, and limited-jurisdiction courts. It then adds a State Justice Institute grant or support authority to provide financial and technical support for eligible organizations to establish, implement, and operate a State judicial threat intelligence and resource center. The center must train judicial officers, courts, and local law enforcement; create judicial-security resources and guides; provide physical security assessments for courts, homes, and other court-related facilities; proactively monitor threats to state and local judges and court staff; coordinate with federal, state, and local law enforcement; develop standardized incident reporting and threat evaluation practices with law enforcement and fusion centers; create a national database for threat reporting, tracking, and sharing; and coordinate research on best practices. The State Justice Institute must report annually, starting one year after the center is established, to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees on the number, type, and seriousness of threats to state and local judiciary members and court staff.

Who Benefits and How

State judges benefit from training, threat monitoring, physical security assessments, and law-enforcement coordination. Local court staff benefit from threat intelligence and standardized incident reporting. Eligible judicial-security nonprofits benefit from financial and technical support to operate the center. State court systems benefit from a national database and best-practices research for judicial security.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The State Justice Institute must fund or support the center and submit annual threat reports to judiciary committees. Eligible organizations must operate training, monitoring, database, assessment, and coordination functions. Law enforcement agencies must coordinate with the center on threat mitigation and incident reporting. Federal taxpayers bear the cost of financial support provided through the State Justice Institute.

Key Provisions

  • Defines eligible organizations for state and local judicial-security technical assistance.
  • Creates State Justice Institute support for a State judicial threat intelligence and resource center.
  • Requires training, resources, physical security assessments, threat monitoring, and law-enforcement coordination.
  • Requires standardized incident reporting, threat evaluation practices, and a national threat database.
  • Requires annual reports to House and Senate Judiciary Committees on threat numbers, types, and seriousness.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a State judicial threat intelligence and resource center through the State Justice Institute to support eligible national nonprofits with judicial-security expertise, provide training, monitor threats, coordinate with law enforcement and fusion centers, build a threat database, and report annually to Congress.

Key Policy Areas

Judicial Security, State Courts, Law Enforcement

Primary Purpose

Creates a State judicial threat intelligence and resource center through the State Justice Institute to support eligible national nonprofits with judicial-security expertise, provide training, monitor threats, coordinate with law enforcement and fusion centers, build a threat database, and report annually to Congress.

Policy Domains

Judicial Security State Courts Law Enforcement

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • State judges
  • Local court staff
  • Eligible judicial-security nonprofits
  • State court systems
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
State judges: , ,
Local court staff: , ,
State court systems: , ,
Eligible judicial-security nonprofits: , ,
Identified Costs
  • State Justice Institute
  • Eligible organizations
  • Law enforcement agencies
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal taxpayers: , ,
Eligible organizations: , ,
State Justice Institute: , ,
Law enforcement agencies: , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 22, 2025

Mrs. McBath (for herself, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Gooden, …

Jul 22, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Jul 22, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Professional Services
9 mentions across 3 clauses
+6 positive ?3 uncertain

Local court staff, State court systems, State judges

General Public
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Eligible judicial-security nonprofits

Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

State Justice Institute

Law Enforcement
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Law enforcement agencies

Taxpayers
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Taxpayers

3/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Judicial Security State Courts Law Enforcement

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology