Build More Housing Near Transit Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Build More Housing Near Transit Act amends the Federal Transit Administration capital investment grant statute. It defines pro-housing policy as state or local action that removes regulatory barriers to constructing or preserving housing, including affordable housing. Examples include reducing parking minimums, creating objective by-right multifamily approval, reducing minimum lot sizes, committing public land to low-income housing, eliminating or raising height limits, increasing by-right density, and other policies determined by the Transportation Secretary in consultation with HUD. When FTA evaluates a project as a whole for project justification under section 5309, the Secretary may increase the rating by one point on the five-point scale if the applicant provides documented evidence of pro-housing policies in areas within walking distance of and accessible to transit facilities along the project route. The incentive is a grant-rating bonus, not a direct zoning mandate.
Who Benefits and How
Transit project sponsors benefit from a possible one-step capital investment grant rating increase. Local governments adopting pro-housing policies benefit from stronger competitiveness for federal transit funding. Affordable housing developers benefit if transit-adjacent jurisdictions remove parking, lot-size, height, or approval barriers. Transit riders benefit if housing supply grows near stations and project routes.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal Transit Administration reviewers must evaluate documented pro-housing policies as part of project justification. Transit applicants must collect and submit evidence of qualifying local or state housing reforms. Local zoning authorities face pressure to change land-use rules near transit routes. Jurisdictions that do not adopt pro-housing policies may lose a rating advantage in capital investment grant competition.
Key Provisions
- Defines pro-housing policy for Federal Transit Administration capital investment grants.
- Includes parking-minimum reductions, by-right multifamily approval, lower lot sizes, public land commitments, and higher density as qualifying reforms.
- Authorizes a one-point increase on the five-point project-justification scale.
- Requires documented evidence of pro-housing policies within walking distance of accessible transit facilities.
- Directs Transportation to consult HUD on additional qualifying policies.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Adds pro-housing policy incentives to Federal Transit Administration capital investment grants by allowing a one-step project-justification rating increase for transit projects whose nearby jurisdictions remove housing barriers near the project route.
Key Policy Areas
Transit, Housing, Infrastructure Grants
Primary Purpose
Adds pro-housing policy incentives to Federal Transit Administration capital investment grants by allowing a one-step project-justification rating increase for transit projects whose nearby jurisdictions remove housing barriers near the project route.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Transit project sponsors
- Local governments adopting pro-housing policies
- Affordable housing developers
- Transit riders
Identified Costs
- Federal Transit Administration reviewers
- Transit applicants
- Local zoning authorities
- Jurisdictions without pro-housing policies
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Mr. Peters (for himself and Mr. Moore of Utah) introduced …
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Local governments adopting pro-housing policies, Local zoning authorities
Positive-direction: Local governments adopting pro-housing policies
Negative-direction: Local zoning authorities
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology