HR4565-119

Introduced

To prohibit the Secretary of Transportation from entering into, extending, or renewing a contract with, or awarding a grant to, a sanctuary city, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Jul 21, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill creates prohibition on federal transportation funding to sanctuary cities with waiver provision. It relies on spending cut and funding restriction. The main policy areas are Immigration.

Who Benefits and How

Immigration and Customs Enforcement would be affected and Department of Homeland Security would be affected.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Sanctuary cities and states could lose revenue opportunities and Undocumented immigrants in sanctuary jurisdictions could face increased risk.

Key Provisions

  • Creates prohibition on federal transportation funding to sanctuary cities with waiver provision.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill creates prohibition on federal transportation funding to sanctuary cities with waiver provision.

Key Policy Areas

Immigration

Primary Purpose

The bill creates prohibition on federal transportation funding to sanctuary cities with waiver provision.

Policy Domains

Immigration

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • Immigration and Customs Enforcement
  • Department of Homeland Security
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Department of Homeland Security:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement:
Identified Costs
  • Sanctuary cities and states
  • Undocumented immigrants in sanctuary jurisdictions
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Sanctuary cities and states:
Undocumented immigrants in sanctuary jurisdictions:

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 21, 2025

Mr. Johnson of South Dakota (for himself, Mr. Babin, Mr. …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
3 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive -1 negative

Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Sanctuary cities and states

Positive-direction: Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Negative-direction: Sanctuary cities and states

Immigration
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Undocumented immigrants in sanctuary jurisdictions

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology