HR4483-119

In Committee

State Accountability for Federal Deployment Costs Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Jul 17, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The State Accountability for Federal Deployment Costs Act creates a reimbursement mechanism for federal military deployments connected to immigration-enforcement conflict. The findings state that immigration enforcement is federal authority and that state or local refusal to cooperate, detainer noncompliance, or obstruction of federal operations can create civil unrest and security emergencies requiring National Guard, Selected Reserve, or active-duty deployments. When federal military personnel are deployed under federal authority to a jurisdiction as a direct result of civil disturbances stemming from lawful federal immigration enforcement and failure by a state or local government to provide reasonable cooperation or coordination, the Defense Secretary must invoice the affected state's governor. Reimbursable costs include temporary duty travel, per diem, housing, lodging, meals, and transportation of personnel and equipment. DHS, consulting the Attorney General, must publicly determine whether state or local actions materially hindered or failed to support the federal operation. The state must pay within 180 days. If not, the President may rescind one or more discretionary federal grants to offset the unpaid amount.

Who Benefits and How

The Department of Defense benefits from a reimbursement path for deployment costs tied to state or local obstruction of federal immigration operations. Federal taxpayers benefit if states reimburse military deployment costs that would otherwise remain federal expenses. Federal immigration enforcement agencies benefit from financial pressure on jurisdictions to coordinate during enforcement operations. States that cooperate with federal immigration operations benefit by avoiding reimbursement invoices under the bill's trigger.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Affected states must pay Defense Department invoices within 180 days when the statutory trigger is met. Governors must respond to reimbursement invoices for deployment costs. DHS must make public determinations about state or local noncooperation in consultation with the Attorney General. Nonpaying states risk rescission of discretionary federal grants to offset unpaid deployment costs.

Key Provisions

  • Requires the Defense Secretary to invoice affected governors for federal military deployment costs tied to immigration-enforcement disturbances and state or local noncooperation.
  • Includes TDY, per diem, housing, lodging, meals, and transportation of personnel and equipment as reimbursable costs.
  • Requires DHS, in consultation with the Attorney General, to publicly determine whether state or local actions materially hindered federal operations.
  • Requires states to pay within 180 days after receiving an invoice.
  • Authorizes presidential rescission of discretionary federal grants to offset nonpayment.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires the Defense Secretary to invoice states for federal military deployment costs when civil disturbances from federal immigration enforcement and state or local noncooperation caused the deployment, with payment due within 180 days and discretionary grant rescission available for nonpayment.

Key Policy Areas

Immigration Enforcement, Defense, State Government

Primary Purpose

Requires the Defense Secretary to invoice states for federal military deployment costs when civil disturbances from federal immigration enforcement and state or local noncooperation caused the deployment, with payment due within 180 days and discretionary grant rescission available for nonpayment.

Policy Domains

Immigration Enforcement Defense State Government

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Department of Defense
  • Federal taxpayers
  • Federal immigration enforcement agencies
  • States that cooperate with federal immigration operations
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal taxpayers: ,
Department of Defense: ,
Federal immigration enforcement agencies: ,
States that cooperate with federal immigration operations: ,
Identified Costs
  • Affected states
  • Governors
  • Department of Homeland Security
  • Nonpaying states
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Governors: ,
Affected states: ,
Nonpaying states: ,
Department of Homeland Security: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 17, 2025

Mr. Arrington (for himself, Ms. Van Duyne, Mr. Gosar, and …

Jul 17, 2025

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition …

Jul 17, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
6 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive -2 negative ?2 uncertain

Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Federal immigration enforcement agencies

Positive-direction: Department of Defense

Negative-direction: Department of Homeland Security

State & Local Government
4 mentions across 2 clauses
-4 negative

Affected states, Governors

Taxpayers
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Taxpayers

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration Enforcement Defense State Government

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology