HR4448-119

In Committee

Restoring Equal Opportunity Act

119th Congress Introduced Jul 16, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Restoring Equal Opportunity Act seeks to remove disparate-impact liability from major federal civil-rights contexts. It states that U.S. policy should eliminate disparate-impact liability to the maximum degree possible. It amends title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 so no person may bring an employment-practice action or proceeding based on disparate impact, defined as a facially neutral practice that may disproportionately affect protected classes without intentional discrimination. It adds the same prohibition to the Fair Housing Act for housing practices. It also declares that specified presidential approvals of Title VI regulations have no force and effect as applied to certain Department of Justice regulations, including portions of 28 C.F.R. 42.104 addressing criteria or methods of administration that have discriminatory effects. The result would shift federal civil-rights enforcement away from effects-based claims and toward intentional-discrimination theories.

Who Benefits and How

Employers benefit from reduced exposure to title VII disparate-impact claims challenging neutral hiring, testing, promotion, or workplace policies. Housing providers benefit from reduced Fair Housing Act disparate-impact litigation risk over neutral housing practices. Regulated recipients of federal funds benefit from nullification of specified Title VI effects-based regulatory approvals. Defendants in civil-rights litigation benefit from a narrower set of federal theories available to plaintiffs.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Workers in protected classes bear the burden because facially neutral employment practices with disproportionate effects would be harder to challenge. Tenants and homebuyers in protected classes bear the burden because disparate-impact housing claims would be barred. Civil-rights plaintiffs must prove intentional discrimination rather than relying on disproportionate effects. Federal civil-rights agencies lose regulatory and enforcement tools tied to effects-based Title VI and related standards.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits title VII employment-practice claims based on disparate impact.
  • Prohibits Fair Housing Act claims based on disparate-impact housing practices.
  • Provides a statutory disparate-impact definition for facially neutral practices that lack discriminatory intent but may disproportionately affect protected classes.
  • Blocks specified presidential approvals of Department of Justice Title VI regulations addressing discriminatory effects.
  • Limits covered federal civil-rights enforcement by shifting claims toward intentional-discrimination theories.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Eliminates federal disparate-impact liability for employment and housing practices and nullifies specified Title VI disparate-impact regulations approved by prior Presidents.

Key Policy Areas

Civil Rights, Employment, Housing

Primary Purpose

Eliminates federal disparate-impact liability for employment and housing practices and nullifies specified Title VI disparate-impact regulations approved by prior Presidents.

Policy Domains

Civil Rights Employment Housing

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Employers
  • Housing providers
  • Regulated recipients of federal funds
  • Defendants in civil-rights litigation
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Employers: , ,
Housing providers: , ,
Defendants in civil-rights litigation: , ,
Regulated recipients of federal funds: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Workers in protected classes
  • Tenants in protected classes
  • Civil-rights plaintiffs
  • Federal civil-rights agencies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Civil-rights plaintiffs: , ,
Tenants in protected classes: , ,
Workers in protected classes: , ,
Federal civil-rights agencies: , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 16, 2025

Mr. Gill of Texas (for himself and Ms. Mace) introduced …

Jul 16, 2025

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition …

Jul 16, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Real Estate
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive -3 negative

Housing providers, Tenants in protected classes

Positive-direction: Housing providers

Negative-direction: Tenants in protected classes

Small Business
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Employers

Government Contractors
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Regulated recipients of federal funds

Labor
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Workers in protected classes

Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
?3 uncertain

Federal civil-rights agencies

3/5
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Civil Rights Employment Housing

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology