HR4433-119

In Committee

Toxic-Free Beauty Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Jul 16, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Toxic-Free Beauty Act amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to ban a defined set of substances from cosmetics. A cosmetic would be adulterated if it intentionally contains ortho-phthalates, formaldehyde-releasing preservatives, formaldehyde, methylene glycol, mercury compounds, certain parabens, phenylenediamines, lilial, styrene, toluene, triclosan, triclocarban, cyclotetrasiloxane, acetaldehyde, or vinyl acetate. It also sets contaminant thresholds: 1,4-dioxane at or above 2 parts per million, lead at or above 2 parts per million for color cosmetics or 5 parts per million for general cosmetics, and asbestos or asbestos-contaminated talc at the lowest possible limit of detection. The bill adds definitions for color cosmetics, contaminants, formaldehyde-releasing preservatives, and general cosmetics, giving FDA and companies a concrete enforcement list rather than a general safety statement.

Who Benefits and How

Cosmetic consumers benefit from statutory bans on specified toxic ingredients and contaminant thresholds. Users of color cosmetics benefit from a lower lead limit for products such as foundation, lipstick, blush, eyeliner, and eyeshadow. Public health advocates benefit from an enforceable federal list covering phthalates, formaldehyde releasers, mercury compounds, asbestos-contaminated talc, and other substances. States with cosmetic restrictions benefit because the federal bill reinforces ingredient safety as a regulatory concern.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Cosmetic manufacturers must reformulate products, test contaminants, review preservatives, and remove listed ingredients. Brand owners must manage product compliance and may have to withdraw or relabel products that contain banned substances. FDA must interpret and enforce the new adulteration categories under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Suppliers of restricted cosmetic chemicals lose market access for intentionally added uses in covered cosmetics.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits intentionally added ortho-phthalates, formaldehyde-releasing preservatives, mercury compounds, certain parabens, phenylenediamines, triclosan, toluene, styrene, and related substances.
  • Sets contaminant limits of 2 parts per million for 1,4-dioxane, 2 parts per million lead for color cosmetics, and 5 parts per million lead for general cosmetics.
  • Requires asbestos and asbestos-contaminated talc to be kept below the lowest possible limit of detection.
  • Adds statutory definitions for color cosmetics, contaminants, formaldehyde-releasing preservatives, and general cosmetics.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Classifies cosmetics as adulterated if they contain specified intentionally added toxic ingredients or contaminant levels for 1,4-dioxane, lead, or asbestos-contaminated talc.

Key Policy Areas

Cosmetics, Consumer Product Safety, FDA

Primary Purpose

Classifies cosmetics as adulterated if they contain specified intentionally added toxic ingredients or contaminant levels for 1,4-dioxane, lead, or asbestos-contaminated talc.

Policy Domains

Cosmetics Consumer Product Safety FDA

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Cosmetic consumers
  • Users of color cosmetics
  • Public health advocates
  • States with cosmetic restrictions
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Cosmetic consumers:
Public health advocates:
Users of color cosmetics:
States with cosmetic restrictions:
Identified Costs
  • Cosmetic manufacturers
  • Brand owners
  • Food and Drug Administration
  • Suppliers of restricted cosmetic chemicals
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Brand owners:
Cosmetic manufacturers:
Food and Drug Administration:
Suppliers of restricted cosmetic chemicals:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 16, 2025

Ms. Schakowsky (for herself, Mrs. Fletcher, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Evans …

Jul 16, 2025

Introduced in House

Jul 16, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Consumers
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Cosmetic consumers, Users of color cosmetics

Cosmetics
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

Brand owners, Cosmetic manufacturers

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Public health advocates

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Food and Drug Administration

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Cosmetics Consumer Product Safety FDA

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology