To require the Secretary of State to promulgate expedited and fixed timelines for the decision-making process to license the export of certain defense articles and defense services, and for other purposes.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The International Traffic in Arms Regulations Licensing Reform Act changes how the State Department handles direct-commercial-sales export license applications for defense articles and defense services. Within 90 days, the Secretary of State must develop and maintain a list of countries and end users for which expedited licensing decisions are vital to U.S. national security. The Secretary must send the initial list to the House Foreign Affairs Committee and Senate Foreign Relations Committee within 30 days after development and update it annually.
Within 30 days after publishing the list, State, in coordination with the Defense Department, must start rulemaking to establish fixed decision timelines. Applications for listed countries or end users should be approved, returned, or denied within 45 days after submission. Applications for all other countries or end users should be approved, returned, or denied within 60 days. The deadlines may be suspended for Arms Export Control Act congressional-review periods or while Defense makes technology-security or foreign-disclosure release decisions. State must report semiannually to the committees on applications from the preceding 180 days that exceeded the applicable deadline, including the articles or services, recipient country, end user, corporate entities, prior similar exports, delay justification, and anticipated decision timeline.
Who Benefits and How
U.S. defense exporters, defense manufacturers seeking Direct Commercial Sales licenses, priority allied governments, priority foreign end users, defense trade compliance advisers, and House and Senate foreign-affairs overseers benefit because the bill creates a predictable 45-day track for priority licenses, a 60-day track for other licenses, annual priority-list visibility, and reports explaining delays.
Who Bears the Burden and How
State Department defense trade licensing staff, Defense Department technology-security officials, Defense Department foreign-disclosure officials, nonpriority defense export applicants, companies with delayed license applications, House Foreign Affairs Committee staff, Senate Foreign Relations Committee staff, and State reporting offices must comply with list maintenance, rulemaking, fixed decision timelines, suspension decisions, classified or sensitive reporting, and delay explanations.
Key Provisions
- Requires State to develop a national-security priority list of countries and end users within 90 days.
- Requires State to submit the initial list to Congress within 30 days and update it annually.
- Requires rulemaking with Defense to create expedited and fixed decision timelines for direct-commercial-sales export licenses.
- Requires 45-day decisions for listed countries or end users and 60-day decisions for other applications when practicable.
- Provides deadline suspensions for Arms Export Control Act congressional-review periods and Defense technology-security decisions.
- Requires semiannual reports on applications that exceed the applicable deadline.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires the State Department to create a national-security priority list of countries and end users for expedited direct-commercial-sales export licensing, establish 45-day and 60-day licensing decision timelines through rulemaking with Defense, and report delayed applications to Congress twice a year.
Key Policy Areas
Defense Trade, Export Controls, Foreign Affairs
Primary Purpose
Requires the State Department to create a national-security priority list of countries and end users for expedited direct-commercial-sales export licensing, establish 45-day and 60-day licensing decision timelines through rulemaking with Defense, and report delayed applications to Congress twice a year.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- U.S. defense exporters
- Defense manufacturers seeking Direct Commercial Sales licenses
- Priority allied governments
- Priority foreign end users
- Defense trade compliance advisers
- House foreign-affairs overseers
- Senate foreign-affairs overseers
Identified Costs
- State Department defense trade licensing staff
- Defense Department technology-security officials
- Defense Department foreign-disclosure officials
- Nonpriority defense export applicants
- Companies with delayed license applications
- House Foreign Affairs Committee staff
- Senate Foreign Relations Committee staff
- State reporting offices
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed HouseMr. Baumgartner (for himself, Mr. Zinke, Mr. Lawler, Mr. McCormick, …
Passed House (inferred from eh version)
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Defense Department foreign-disclosure officials, Defense Department technology-security officials, House Foreign Affairs Committee staff
Positive-direction: House Foreign Affairs Committee staff, Senate Foreign Relations Committee staff
Negative-direction: Defense Department foreign-disclosure officials, Defense Department technology-security officials, State Department defense trade licensing staff, State reporting offices
Companies with delayed license applications, Defense manufacturers seeking Direct Commercial Sales licenses, Nonpriority defense export applicants
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "state"
- → Secretary of State
- "defense"
- → Secretary of Defense
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology