HR4176-119

In Committee

No Secret Police Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Jun 26, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The No Secret Police Act adds an identification rule for Department of Homeland Security officers and agents performing border-security or immigration-enforcement detentions or arrests. During a covered detention or arrest, the officer must identify the DHS component that employs them, display or wear visible official insignia or uniform, and may not wear a face covering or other item concealing the face. The bill preserves tactical gear but requires the Secretary to report current tactical-gear policies to House and Senate homeland security committees within 30 days and report later policy changes. It also directs DHS Science and Technology, with component heads, to research technology that maximizes visibility of official insignia or uniforms during detentions and arrests.

Who Benefits and How

People detained in immigration enforcement benefit because officers must identify their DHS component and display visible official insignia or uniform. Immigrant-rights attorneys benefit from clearer officer identification during arrests and detentions. Congressional homeland security committees benefit from required reports on DHS tactical-gear policies and changes. Civil liberties organizations benefit because the bill limits face coverings and secretive officer presentation in covered operations.

Who Bears the Burden and How

DHS immigration agents must change field practices when detaining or arresting individuals in covered border or immigration functions. Customs and Border Protection officers must display visible official identifiers and avoid face coverings unless another law applies. The Secretary of Homeland Security must submit tactical-gear reports within 30 days and after policy modifications. DHS Science and Technology staff must research visibility technology for official insignia and uniforms.

Key Provisions

  • Requires DHS officers in covered border-security or immigration-enforcement detentions to identify their employing component.
  • Requires visible official insignia or uniforms during covered detentions or arrests.
  • Prohibits face coverings or other items that conceal the officer's face while preserving tactical gear policies.
  • Directs tactical-gear reports and DHS research on technology that maximizes visibility of official identifiers.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires DHS border-security and immigration-enforcement officers to identify their component, display visible insignia or uniforms, avoid face coverings during detentions or arrests, report tactical-gear policies, and research visibility technology.

Key Policy Areas

Immigration Enforcement, Civil Liberties, Homeland Security

Primary Purpose

Requires DHS border-security and immigration-enforcement officers to identify their component, display visible insignia or uniforms, avoid face coverings during detentions or arrests, report tactical-gear policies, and research visibility technology.

Policy Domains

Immigration Enforcement Civil Liberties Homeland Security

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • People detained in immigration enforcement
  • Immigrant-rights attorneys
  • Congressional homeland security committees
  • Civil liberties organizations
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Immigrant-rights attorneys: ,
Civil liberties organizations: ,
Congressional homeland security committees: ,
People detained in immigration enforcement: ,
Identified Costs
  • DHS immigration agents
  • Customs and Border Protection officers
  • Secretary of Homeland Security
  • DHS Science and Technology staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
DHS immigration agents: ,
Secretary of Homeland Security: ,
DHS Science and Technology staff: ,
Customs and Border Protection officers: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 27, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.

Jun 26, 2025

Mr. Goldman of New York (for himself, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. …

Jun 26, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition …

Jun 26, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
6 mentions across 2 clauses
-6 negative

Customs and Border Protection officers, DHS Science and Technology staff, DHS immigration agents

Immigration
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

People detained in immigration enforcement

Professional Services
2 mentions across 2 clauses
?2 uncertain

Immigrant-rights attorneys

Advocacy Groups
2 mentions across 2 clauses
?2 uncertain

Civil liberties organizations

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration Enforcement Civil Liberties Homeland Security

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology