HR4016-119

Passed House

Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026

119th Congress Introduced Jun 16, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

This appropriations bill funds the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2026 and then sets the rules for how those funds may be obligated, transferred, reported, and restricted. It bars unauthorized publicity or propaganda spending, limits late-year obligations to 20 percent of annual appropriations, gives the Secretary of Defense transfer authority capped at $6,000,000,000 with OMB approval, makes the explanatory statement and classified annex controlling for program-level amounts, and requires a 60-day baseline report before reprogramming. It also restricts working capital fund cash transfers, requires advance notice for special access programs, and limits new multiyear procurement or economic-order-quantity contracts unless Congress receives required notice.

The bill contains a long set of program and policy controls. It restricts certain DOD activities around critical race theory, diversity initiatives, gender-affirming surgical procedures and hormone therapies, NewsGuard Technologies Inc., classified information on unsecured networks, Posse Comitatus compliance, and government travel card misuse. It protects or directs specific programs, including a $40,000,000 Navy shipbuilding transfer authority, controls on U-2 and F-15 divestment, no pause or cancellation of UH-60 Blackhawk and E-7 Wedgetail programs, rapid-acquisition authorities, shipbuilding amounts for prior-year shortfalls, and reporting for the Navy Next Generation Fighter. It also rescinds or reduces funds for claimed savings, including $3,000,000,000 tied to H.R. 1 savings and efficiencies, $1,000,000,000 from bulk fuel savings, $3,750,000,000 from cooperation with DOGE, and $1,000,000,000 from management efficiencies.

Who Benefits and How

Military departments and combatant commands benefit from FY2026 operating, procurement, research, and defense health appropriations, but within tighter transfer and reporting rules. Navy shipbuilding programs benefit from transfer authority and program-specific funding direction. Blackhawk and E-7 suppliers benefit from restrictions on pausing or cancelling those programs. The National Defense Stockpile benefits from $90,000,000, including $10,000,000 for titanium, if an execution plan is submitted. Platform Supply Vessel pilot participants benefit from $80,000,000. The Irregular Warfare Center receives $12,000,000. Congressional defense and appropriations committees benefit from baseline reports, prior notices, quarterly reporting, public website posting, and restrictions that make spending choices more visible.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Secretary of Defense, DOD comptrollers, military department budget offices, special access program managers, procurement officials, intelligence program managers, defense health administrators, and program offices affected by savings reductions bear the implementation burden because they must comply with transfer caps, notice requirements, program-level funding tables, procurement restrictions, reprogramming controls, and policy riders. Contractors affected by Buy American rules, weapons procurement limits, NewsGuard restrictions, grant-posting rules, and classified-network requirements face narrower eligibility or added compliance checks. DOD policy offices responsible for DEI, gender-affirming care policy, U-2 and F-15 divestments, and major program cancellations are constrained by direct funding prohibitions.

Key Provisions

  • Appropriates fiscal year 2026 defense funds and makes program-level tables and classified annexes binding for DOD execution.
  • Caps general DOD transfer authority at $6,000,000,000 and requires approval, notice, and baseline reporting before reprogramming.
  • Restricts new special access programs, multiyear procurements, and certain economic-order-quantity contracts without advance congressional notice.
  • Bars funding for specified policy activities, including certain CRT, DEI, gender-affirming care, NewsGuard, and unsecured classified-information uses.
  • Authorizes a $40,000,000 Navy shipbuilding transfer authority and protects UH-60 Blackhawk and E-7 Wedgetail programs from pause, cancellation, or termination.
  • Reduces appropriations for stated savings, including $3,000,000,000 from H.R. 1 savings, $1,000,000,000 from bulk fuel savings, $3,750,000,000 from DOGE cooperation, and $1,000,000,000 from management efficiencies.
  • Provides targeted amounts for the National Defense Stockpile, a Platform Supply Vessel pilot, and the Irregular Warfare Center.
  • Requires reports or compliance controls for Navy Next Generation Fighter, Posse Comitatus, military parade expenses, classified-network use, and sexual assault forensic exams for civilian personnel.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Makes fiscal year 2026 Department of Defense appropriations and attaches detailed fiscal controls, transfer caps, procurement restrictions, program-specific protections, savings rescissions, and policy riders governing DOD operations, procurement, research, intelligence, and defense health spending.

Key Policy Areas

Defense, Appropriations, Government Oversight

Primary Purpose

Makes fiscal year 2026 Department of Defense appropriations and attaches detailed fiscal controls, transfer caps, procurement restrictions, program-specific protections, savings rescissions, and policy riders governing DOD operations, procurement, research, intelligence, and defense health spending.

Policy Domains

Defense Appropriations Government Oversight

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Military departments
  • Combatant commands
  • Navy shipbuilding programs
  • UH-60 Blackhawk suppliers
  • E-7 Wedgetail suppliers
  • National Defense Stockpile
  • Platform Supply Vessel pilot participants
  • Irregular Warfare Center
  • Congressional defense committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Combatant commands: , , , , , , , , , ,
Military departments: , , , , , , , , , ,
E-7 Wedgetail suppliers: , , , , , , , , , ,
Irregular Warfare Center: , , , , , , , , , ,
UH-60 Blackhawk suppliers: , , , , , , , , , ,
National Defense Stockpile: , , , , , , , , , ,
Navy shipbuilding programs: , , , , , , , , , ,
Congressional defense committees: , , , , , , , , , ,
Platform Supply Vessel pilot participants: , , , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Secretary of Defense
  • DOD comptrollers
  • Military department budget offices
  • Special access program managers
  • Procurement officials
  • Defense health administrators
  • Program offices affected by savings reductions
  • Contractors subject to procurement restrictions
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
DOD comptrollers: , , , , , , , , , ,
Secretary of Defense: , , , , , , , , , ,
Procurement officials: , , , , , , , , , ,
Defense health administrators: , , , , , , , , , ,
Special access program managers: , , , , , , , , , ,
Military department budget offices: , , , , , , , , , ,
Program offices affected by savings reductions: , , , , , , , , , ,
Contractors subject to procurement restrictions: , , , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 8, 2025

Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. …

Dec 2, 2025

Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. …

Nov 19, 2025

Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate.

Nov 18, 2025

Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. …

Oct 16, 2025

Motion by Senator Thune to reconsider the vote by which …

Oct 16, 2025

Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not …

Oct 14, 2025

Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure …

Oct 14, 2025

Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. …

Jul 31, 2025

Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under …

Jul 30, 2025

Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
115 mentions across 111 clauses
+43 positive -70 negative ?2 uncertain

53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron (Hurricane Hunters), APFIT acquisition program, Agencies receiving DoD appropriations

Department of Defense, National Intelligence Program, Secretary of Defense face effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron (Hurricane Hunters), APFIT acquisition program, Air Force F-15 fleet, Armed Forces members and DoD civilian employees, Army logistics and sealift operations, Army military museums, Army special projects, Central Intelligence Agency programs, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Defense Innovation Unit, Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency, Defense rapid acquisition programs, Department of Defense personnel, DoD Education Activity schools, DoD civilian employees, DoD civilian personnel, DoD foreign national employees, Indo-Pacific Command theater security cooperation, Intelligence and intelligence-related activities, Irregular Warfare Center, Maritime Administration, Military services (Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Space Force), National Defense Stockpile, National Guard Distance Learning Project, National Guard and Reserve intelligence personnel, National Guard and Reserve military technicians, National Guard members, National Reconnaissance Office, Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Navy Indo-Pacific logistics operations, Navy Littoral Combat Ship program, Navy ship construction programs, Office of the Director of National Intelligence R&T programs, Pacific Fleet, Seriously injured service members, U-2 reconnaissance program, U.S. Southern Command, U.S. Southern Command headquarters, U.S. nuclear strategic forces, U.S.-Kuwait defense cooperation

Negative-direction: Agencies receiving DoD appropriations, Air Force C-40 fleet operations, Army medical facilities in Hawaii, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation office, Defense Innovation programs, Defense Media Activity, Department of Defense IT operations, Department of Defense Working Capital Funds, Department of Defense detention operations, Department of Defense foreign military support, Department of Defense headquarters activities, Department of Defense health programs, Department of Defense hiring, Department of Defense operations, Department of Defense procurement, Department of Defense recruiting and installation programs, Department of Defense training programs, Director of National Intelligence, DoD Acquisition Workforce Development Account, DoD DEI offices, DoD DEI programs, DoD RDTE programs, DoD Working Capital Funds, DoD and CIA counter-drug programs, DoD military and civilian personnel, DoD research programs using animals, DoD security cooperation programs, Fleet Forces Command, Intelligence Community, Military family housing maintenance, Military services, Military services O&M accounts, NSA, Naming Commission and Confederate commemoration removal efforts, Rapid acquisition programs, U.S. Northern Command, U.S. military operations in Iraq and Syria

Defense
21 mentions across 20 clauses
+15 positive -6 negative

Allied defense suppliers with reciprocal agreements, Alternative F-35 engine developers, Defense contractors

Positive-direction: Allied defense suppliers with reciprocal agreements, Defense equipment suppliers, Defense industrial base, Defense industrial base companies, Defense security cooperation contractors, Defense technology companies, Demilitarization contractors, E-7 Wedgetail program (Boeing), F-35 program (Lockheed Martin), Navy Next Generation Fighter program, Pratt & Whitney (F135 engine), Prime contractors using Native subcontractors, U.S. defense contractors supporting Taiwan sales, U.S. missile defense contractors (Iron Dome, Arrow co-production), UH-60 Blackhawk program (Sikorsky)

Negative-direction: Alternative F-35 engine developers, Defense contractors, Defense contractors seeking multiyear contracts, Defense contractors undergoing mergers, Nuclear missile defense programs

Manufacturing
14 mentions across 8 clauses
+8 positive -6 negative

Defense suppliers seeking capital, Foreign bearing manufacturers, Foreign chain manufacturers

Positive-direction: Defense suppliers seeking capital, U.S. anchor and mooring chain manufacturers, U.S. and Canadian steel producers, U.S. ball and roller bearing manufacturers, U.S. flag manufacturers, U.S. manufacturers, U.S. semiconductor manufacturers, U.S. supercomputer manufacturers

Negative-direction: Foreign bearing manufacturers, Foreign chain manufacturers, Foreign flag manufacturers, Foreign steel producers, Foreign supercomputer manufacturers, Foreign suppliers

Nonprofits
8 mentions across 7 clauses
+7 positive -1 negative

American Red Cross, Civil Air Patrol Corporation, Disinformation research organizations

Positive-direction: American Red Cross, Civil Air Patrol Corporation, Fisher House Foundation, Inc., Fisher Houses and Suites, John C. Stennis Center for Public Service, United Service Organizations, Youth and nonprofit organizations

Negative-direction: Disinformation research organizations

Foreign Entities
8 mentions across 8 clauses
+6 positive -2 negative

Countries with reciprocal defense procurement agreements, Foreign security forces, Israel missile defense programs

Positive-direction: Foreign security forces, Israel missile defense programs, Jordan and other foreign partners (excluding Pakistan), Jordan armed forces, Pacific Island territories and associated states, Taiwan defense cooperation

Negative-direction: Countries with reciprocal defense procurement agreements, Rosoboronexport (Russian state arms exporter)

Shipbuilding
6 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive -2 negative

Foreign marine equipment suppliers, LCS shipyards (Austal, Lockheed Martin), Navy shipbuilding contractors

Positive-direction: LCS shipyards (Austal, Lockheed Martin), Navy shipbuilding contractors, U.S. marine equipment manufacturers

Negative-direction: Foreign marine equipment suppliers

Research & Science
4 mentions across 3 clauses
-4 negative

EcoHealth Alliance, Inc., Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs), Foreign adversary laboratories

Technology
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+3 positive -1 negative

Defense software vendors, Innovative defense technology companies, NewsGuard Technologies Inc.

Positive-direction: Defense software vendors, Innovative defense technology companies, Software and digital technology pilot programs

Negative-direction: NewsGuard Technologies Inc.

5/176
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown
Senate Roll #575

On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed H.R. 4016

Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to H.R. 4016

Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-44, 3/5 majority required)
50 Yea 44 Nay 6 Not Voting
Oct 16, 2025
House Roll #212

On Passage

Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026

Passed
221 Yea 209 Nay 2 Not Voting
Jul 18, 2025
House Roll #211

On Motion to Recommit

Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026

Failed
211 Yea 219 Nay 2 Not Voting
Jul 18, 2025
House Roll #210

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Failed
76 Yea 355 Nay 6 Not Voting
Jul 18, 2025
House Roll #209

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Failed
76 Yea 353 Nay 8 Not Voting
Jul 18, 2025
House Roll #208

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Failed
30 Yea 400 Nay 7 Not Voting
Jul 18, 2025
House Roll #207

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Failed
6 Yea 422 Nay 9 Not Voting
Jul 18, 2025
House Roll #206

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Failed
104 Yea 326 Nay 7 Not Voting
Jul 18, 2025
House Roll #205

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Failed
6 Yea 421 Nay 10 Not Voting
Jul 18, 2025
House Roll #204

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Failed
63 Yea 365 Nay 9 Not Voting
Jul 18, 2025

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Defense Appropriations Government Oversight
Actor Mappings
"dod"
→ Department of Defense
"secretary"
→ Secretary of Defense
"committees"
→ House and Senate Appropriations Committees

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology