HR3916-119

In Committee

My Body, My Data Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Jun 11, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The My Body, My Data Act creates a federal privacy rule for personal reproductive or sexual health information held by covered businesses and service providers. A regulated entity may collect, keep, use, or disclose that information only when strictly necessary to provide a product or service the person requested, and internal access must be limited to employees or service providers who need the information for that requested product or service. Individuals get verified-request rights to see retained information, learn which third parties supplied or received it, correct inaccurate data, and delete retained data, including inferences and third-party-collected information. Entities must publish clear privacy policies listing categories of reproductive or sexual health data, purposes, third parties, controls, and safeguards. They may not retaliate by denying service, charging different prices, lowering quality, or suggesting worse terms because a person used these rights. Violations are treated like FTC unfair or deceptive practice rule violations, FTC may issue implementing regulations, individuals may sue for $100 to $1,000 per violation per day or actual damages, punitive damages, fees, costs, and equitable relief, and privacy violations count as concrete injuries. Pre-dispute arbitration agreements and joint-action waivers are unenforceable for disputes under the Act. State attorneys general may also enforce, stronger state privacy laws are preserved, First Amendment freedoms are not limited, and the FTC keeps its other authority.

Who Benefits and How

Patients seeking reproductive health care benefit because apps, websites, data brokers, and service providers must minimize sensitive data collection and disclosure. Abortion patients benefit from rights to delete, correct, and trace reproductive-health information that could reveal services, location, medication, or procedure history. Contraception users benefit because purchase and use data receive the same access, correction, deletion, and privacy-policy protections. State attorneys general benefit from explicit enforcement authority for reproductive and sexual health privacy violations. Privacy plaintiffs benefit from statutory damages, punitive damages, attorney fees, and limits on forced arbitration.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Regulated health app operators must rebuild data practices around strict necessity, access limits, verified requests, and privacy-policy disclosures. Third-party data brokers must disclose sources and recipients and may lose retention or resale opportunities for reproductive health data. FTC privacy staff must enforce the Act and may write implementing rules. Service providers handling sensitive data must restrict employee access and honor deletion or correction obligations through their business customers. Companies relying on arbitration clauses cannot force covered disputes into pre-dispute arbitration or block joint actions.

Key Provisions

  • Limits reproductive or sexual health data collection, retention, use, and disclosure to what is strictly necessary for requested services.
  • Creates individual rights to access, correct, delete, and trace third-party sources or recipients of sensitive health data.
  • Requires clear privacy policies explaining data categories, purposes, third parties, user controls, and safeguards.
  • Prohibits retaliation against individuals who exercise privacy rights.
  • Provides FTC enforcement, private civil actions, statutory damages, punitive damages, fees, and state attorney general enforcement.
  • Bars forced arbitration and joint-action waivers for disputes under the Act.
  • Preserves stronger state privacy laws, FTC authority, and First Amendment protections.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Limits regulated entities to collecting, retaining, using, or disclosing personal reproductive or sexual health information only when strictly necessary for a requested product or service; gives individuals access, correction, deletion, and third-party disclosure rights; requires detailed privacy policies; bars retaliation for exercising rights; creates FTC enforcement, rulemaking, private civil actions, statutory damages, punitive damages, fees, court-decided arbitration disputes, and state attorney general enforcement; preserves stronger state privacy laws and First Amendment freedoms.

Key Policy Areas

Privacy, Reproductive Health, Consumer Protection

Primary Purpose

Limits regulated entities to collecting, retaining, using, or disclosing personal reproductive or sexual health information only when strictly necessary for a requested product or service; gives individuals access, correction, deletion, and third-party disclosure rights; requires detailed privacy policies; bars retaliation for exercising rights; creates FTC enforcement, rulemaking, private civil actions, statutory damages, punitive damages, fees, court-decided arbitration disputes, and state attorney general enforcement; preserves stronger state privacy laws and First Amendment freedoms.

Policy Domains

Privacy Reproductive Health Consumer Protection

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Patients seeking reproductive health care
  • Abortion patients
  • Contraception users
  • State attorneys general
  • Privacy plaintiffs
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Abortion patients: , , , , ,
Privacy plaintiffs: , , , , ,
Contraception users: , , , , ,
State attorneys general: , , , , ,
Patients seeking reproductive health care: , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Regulated health app operators
  • Third-party data brokers
  • FTC privacy staff
  • Sensitive data service providers
  • Companies relying on arbitration clauses
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
FTC privacy staff: , , , , ,
Third-party data brokers: , , , , ,
Regulated health app operators: , , , , ,
Sensitive data service providers: , , , , ,
Companies relying on arbitration clauses: , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 11, 2025

Ms. Jacobs (for herself, Ms. McClellan, Ms. Escobar, Ms. Crockett, …

Jun 11, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Jun 11, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Reproductive Health
12 mentions across 6 clauses
+12 positive

Abortion patients, Contraception users

Technology
12 mentions across 6 clauses
-12 negative

Regulated health app operators, Sensitive data service providers

Health Privacy
6 mentions across 6 clauses
?6 uncertain

Patients seeking reproductive health care

State & Local Government
6 mentions across 6 clauses
?6 uncertain

State attorneys general

Consumers
6 mentions across 6 clauses
+6 positive

Privacy plaintiffs

Data Brokerage
6 mentions across 6 clauses
-6 negative

Third-party data brokers

Government
6 mentions across 6 clauses
-6 negative

FTC privacy staff

Small Business
6 mentions across 6 clauses
?6 uncertain

Companies relying on arbitration clauses

6/11
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Privacy Reproductive Health Consumer Protection

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology