ACERO Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The ACERO Act directs the NASA Administrator to leverage NASA-developed tools and technologies under the Advanced Capabilities for Emergency Response Operations project, or successor projects, to improve aerial wildfire response. The research and development may cover advanced aircraft technologies, airspace management, deconfliction and coordination of aerial assets, real-time data exchange for wildfire response teams, interoperable platforms for situational awareness, and a multi-agency concept of operations involving Federal, State, and local agencies. NASA may coordinate with regional organizations, commercial partners, academic institutions, and other Federal departments while avoiding duplication. The bill also bars NASA from procuring unmanned aircraft systems made or assembled by covered foreign entities for ACERO activities unless the Administrator grants a case-by-case waiver after required determinations.
Who Benefits and How
Wildfire response teams benefit from research into better aerial asset coordination, deconfliction, and real-time data exchange. State wildfire agencies benefit from a multi-agency concept of operations that can improve shared airspace management. NASA aviation researchers benefit from statutory direction to apply ACERO technology to emergency response. U.S. unmanned aircraft manufacturers benefit from a procurement preference against covered foreign systems. Aerospace data-platform vendors benefit from demand for interoperable situational-awareness tools.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The NASA Administrator must conduct or coordinate research and development, consult other agencies, avoid duplication, and manage any waiver decisions. Federal wildfire aviation offices must coordinate with NASA on airspace and concept-of-operations work. Covered foreign drone manufacturers lose procurement opportunities unless waivers are granted. Commercial partners and academic institutions may need to meet NASA coordination and data-sharing expectations. Procurement officers must screen unmanned aircraft systems for covered foreign entity restrictions.
Key Provisions
- Requires NASA to use ACERO tools and technologies to improve aerial wildfire response.
- Supports research on aircraft technology, airspace management, deconfliction, real-time data exchange, and situational awareness.
- Establishes a multi-agency concept of operations for wildfire aerial response.
- Allows coordination with government agencies, regional organizations, commercial partners, and academic institutions.
- Prohibits procurement of covered foreign unmanned aircraft systems unless the NASA Administrator grants a case-specific waiver.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Directs NASA to use ACERO tools and technologies for wildfire aerial response research and development, including aircraft technologies, airspace management, real-time data exchange, interoperable situational awareness, multi-agency operating concepts, coordination with government and commercial partners, and a procurement restriction on unmanned aircraft systems made or assembled by covered foreign entities unless waived.
Key Policy Areas
Wildfire, NASA, Aviation Technology
Primary Purpose
Directs NASA to use ACERO tools and technologies for wildfire aerial response research and development, including aircraft technologies, airspace management, real-time data exchange, interoperable situational awareness, multi-agency operating concepts, coordination with government and commercial partners, and a procurement restriction on unmanned aircraft systems made or assembled by covered foreign entities unless waived.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Wildfire response teams
- State wildfire agencies
- NASA aviation researchers
- U.S. unmanned aircraft manufacturers
- Aerospace data-platform vendors
Identified Costs
- NASA Administrator
- Federal wildfire aviation offices
- Covered foreign drone manufacturers
- Commercial partners
- Procurement officers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, …
The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without …
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2241-2242)
Mr. Babin moved to suspend the rules and pass the …
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 427.
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
NASA Administrator, Procurement officers, State wildfire agencies
Positive-direction: State wildfire agencies
Negative-direction: NASA Administrator, Procurement officers
Covered foreign drone manufacturers, NASA aviation researchers, U.S. unmanned aircraft manufacturers
Positive-direction: NASA aviation researchers, U.S. unmanned aircraft manufacturers
Negative-direction: Covered foreign drone manufacturers
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "nasa"
- → National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- "administrator"
- → NASA Administrator
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology