HR389-119

In Committee

Southern Border Farmers and Ranchers Protection Act

119th Congress Introduced Jan 14, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Southern Border Farmers and Ranchers Protection Act creates a targeted payment path inside the Food Security Act conservation program. USDA must provide payments to producers to implement conservation practices that address and repair damage to agricultural land and farming infrastructure on covered land when that damage contributes to natural-resource concerns or problems. The contracts are one-year contracts. Covered land is land in a county at or near the southern border of Texas, and the bill lists counties including Brewster, Brooks, Cameron, El Paso, Hidalgo, Maverick, Presidio, Starr, Val Verde, Webb, Willacy, Zapata, and Zavala. The bill is not a general border-security bill; it is a farm and ranch repair measure that uses USDA conservation payments for land, fences, roads, water infrastructure, and related agricultural damage in the named Texas counties.

Who Benefits and How

Southern Texas producers benefit because USDA must pay for conservation practices that repair qualifying agricultural land or infrastructure damage. Border county ranchers benefit if damaged fencing, water systems, soil, or access infrastructure can be treated as conservation-related repair needs. Texas conservation districts benefit from a clearer federal program hook for producers in the listed counties. Rural border communities benefit indirectly if repaired farm infrastructure reduces resource damage and restores agricultural operations.

Who Bears the Burden and How

USDA NRCS staff must administer the new Southern Border Initiative within conservation-program contracts. Federal taxpayers bear the cost of mandatory payments for qualifying one-year contracts. Producers outside the listed Texas counties do not receive the new targeted payment path. Applicants must document that damage to land or infrastructure contributes to natural-resource concerns or problems.

Key Provisions

  • Requires USDA payments for conservation practices that repair qualifying agricultural land and farming infrastructure damage.
  • Limits covered land to counties at or near the southern border of Texas that are listed in the bill.
  • Provides one-year contracts for the Southern Border Initiative.
  • Uses Food Security Act conservation authority rather than creating a standalone disaster program.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Adds a Southern Border Initiative to the Food Security Act conservation program requiring USDA payments to producers in listed Texas border and near-border counties for one-year contracts that implement conservation practices repairing damage to agricultural land and farming infrastructure that contributes to natural-resource concerns.

Key Policy Areas

Agriculture, Conservation, Texas

Primary Purpose

Adds a Southern Border Initiative to the Food Security Act conservation program requiring USDA payments to producers in listed Texas border and near-border counties for one-year contracts that implement conservation practices repairing damage to agricultural land and farming infrastructure that contributes to natural-resource concerns.

Policy Domains

Agriculture Conservation Texas

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Southern Texas producers
  • Border county ranchers
  • Texas conservation districts
  • Rural border communities
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Border county ranchers:
Rural border communities:
Southern Texas producers:
Texas conservation districts:
Identified Costs
  • USDA NRCS staff
  • Federal taxpayers
  • Noncovered producers
  • Applicant producers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
USDA NRCS staff:
Federal taxpayers:
Applicant producers:
Noncovered producers:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 14, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.

Jan 14, 2025

Ms. De La Cruz (for herself and Mr. Tony Gonzales …

Jan 14, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

Jan 14, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Agriculture
3 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive -1 negative

Border county ranchers, Noncovered producers, Southern Texas producers

Positive-direction: Border county ranchers, Southern Texas producers

Negative-direction: Noncovered producers

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Texas conservation districts

Rural Communities
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Rural border communities

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

USDA NRCS staff

Taxpayers
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Taxpayers

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Agriculture Conservation Texas

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology