HR3838-119

Passed House

Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026

119th Congress Introduced Jun 9, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill is a large defense authorization package. The first division, the SPEED Act, rewrites how the Department of Defense acquisition system is supposed to serve servicemembers by requiring faster delivery of needed capabilities, assigning program executive officers clearer responsibility over plans and budgets, creating major capability activity areas and pathfinder programs, adding product-support manager duties, and changing life-cycle sustainment rules. It also creates or restructures requirements organizations, including a Requirements, Acquisition, and Programming Integration Directorate and a Mission Engineering and Integration Activity, so military requirements, acquisition, and programming decisions are coordinated earlier.

The National Defense Authorization Act division authorizes fiscal year 2026 defense procurement and research accounts and gives specific contract authorities for major systems. It supports Army UH-60 Blackhawk multiyear procurement and future long-range assault aircraft early production; authorizes Navy Ford class aircraft carrier contract authority, Columbia class submarine contracting, and Virginia class submarine advance procurement; and includes controls on Army prepositioned stocks, ship programs, Air Force and Space Force programs, missile defense, munitions, and defense-wide research. The bill also adds industrial-base provisions such as a Defense Industrial Resilience Consortium, data-as-a-service requirements for weapon-system contracts, modular open systems and technical-data rules, advanced manufacturing qualification, procurement technical assistance changes, surge-capacity reporting, and Defense Innovation Unit transition support.

Who Benefits and How

Servicemembers benefit if acquisition reforms shorten the time between an operational need and fielded equipment. Army aviation programs benefit from Blackhawk and future long-range assault aircraft authorities. Navy shipbuilders and submarine suppliers benefit from Ford, Columbia, and Virginia class contracting authority and advance procurement. Defense contractors, defense software vendors, advanced manufacturing firms, munitions suppliers, and small manufacturers in the defense industrial base benefit from clearer program structures, consortium activity, procurement technical assistance, and transition pathways from prototype work into production. Congressional defense committees benefit from additional reports and oversight hooks that make major program changes easier to track.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Secretary of Defense, military department acquisition executives, program executive officers, product support managers, requirements officials, the Defense Innovation Unit, the Defense Acquisition University, and industrial-base policy offices take on new planning, reporting, coordination, and governance duties. Contractors that build major weapon systems face additional requirements around modular open systems, technical data, data-as-a-service, product support, and supply-chain qualification. GAO and congressional committee staff receive more review work because the bill requires studies on acquisition workforce management, cost accounting standards, commercial buying practices, surge capacity, and other implementation issues.

Key Provisions

  • Requires the defense acquisition system to align with servicemember operational needs and deliver capabilities more quickly.
  • Establishes clearer program executive officer and product support manager responsibilities for plans, budgets, execution, and sustainment.
  • Creates requirements and mission-engineering structures to connect Joint Chiefs requirements, acquisition decisions, and programming choices.
  • Authorizes fiscal year 2026 procurement and research activity for the military departments and defense-wide programs.
  • Authorizes contract and advance-procurement authorities for UH-60 Blackhawk aircraft, future long-range assault aircraft, Ford class carriers, Columbia class submarines, and Virginia class submarines.
  • Establishes industrial-base tools including a Defense Industrial Resilience Consortium, advanced-manufacturing qualification rules, procurement technical assistance changes, surge-capacity reporting, and DIU transition support.
  • Requires modular open systems, technical-data, and data-as-a-service controls for certain weapon-system contracts.
  • Requires GAO and DOD reviews of acquisition workforce, cost accounting, commercial buying, surge capacity, and training issues.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Combines the SPEED Act defense-acquisition rewrite with the fiscal year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, authorizing defense procurement and research while changing acquisition governance, shipbuilding and aircraft authorities, industrial-base programs, military personnel policy, and oversight controls.

Key Policy Areas

Defense, Government Procurement, Military Personnel, Industrial Base

Primary Purpose

Combines the SPEED Act defense-acquisition rewrite with the fiscal year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, authorizing defense procurement and research while changing acquisition governance, shipbuilding and aircraft authorities, industrial-base programs, military personnel policy, and oversight controls.

Policy Domains

Defense Government Procurement Military Personnel Industrial Base

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Servicemembers
  • Army aviation programs
  • Navy shipbuilders
  • Submarine suppliers
  • Defense contractors
  • Defense software vendors
  • Advanced manufacturing firms
  • Munitions suppliers
  • Small manufacturers in the defense industrial base
  • Congressional defense committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: eh
Servicemembers: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Navy shipbuilders: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Defense contractors: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Munitions suppliers: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Submarine suppliers: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Army aviation programs: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Defense software vendors: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Advanced manufacturing firms: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Congressional defense committees: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Small manufacturers in the defense industrial base: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Secretary of Defense
  • Military department acquisition executives
  • Program executive officers
  • Product support managers
  • Defense Innovation Unit
  • Defense Acquisition University
  • Industrial-base policy offices
  • Major weapon-system contractors
  • Government Accountability Office
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: eh
Secretary of Defense: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Defense Innovation Unit: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Product support managers: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Program executive officers: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Defense Acquisition University: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Industrial-base policy offices: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Major weapon-system contractors: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Government Accountability Office: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Military department acquisition executives: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 30, 2025

Received in the Senate.

Sep 10, 2025

The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and …

Sep 10, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Sep 10, 2025

On passage Passed by recorded vote: 231 - 196 (Roll …

Sep 10, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: …

Sep 10, 2025

On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: …

Sep 10, 2025

The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered …

Sep 10, 2025

Ms. Houlahan moved to recommit to the Committee on Armed …

Sep 10, 2025

The House adopted the amendments en gros as agreed to …

Sep 10, 2025

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Military
523 mentions across 508 clauses
+218 positive -137 negative ?7 uncertain

Active duty members of the Armed Forces, Active duty members of the Armed Forces and their dependents, Active duty members of the Armed Forces and their spouses

Active duty military personnel, Army, Department of Defense, Members of the Armed Forces face effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Active duty members of the Armed Forces and their dependents, Active duty military members and their dependents, Active duty military personnel in explosive ordnance disposal roles, Active duty military personnel with explosive ordnance disposal duties, Air Force, Air Force Reserve, Air Force and Space Force museums, Air Force installations providing technical training and maintenance proficiency, Air Force personnel and resources dedicated to nuclear and long-range strike missions, Air Force personnel and resources dedicated to nuclear missions, Air National Guard of the United States, Armed Forces members assigned to Alaska, Armed Forces members in occupational specialties with civilian equivalents, Armed forces of Lebanon, Army National Guard locations inside the United States, Army National Guard of the United States, Army Reserve, Army and Marine Corps, Army museums and related institutions, Army museums and related personnel, Army's Next Generation Initial Entry Rotary Wing training program at Fort Novosel, Alabama, Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Space Force personnel, Cadets and Midshipmen, Commissioned officers and enlisted members of the armed forces, Defense laboratories and test organizations, Department of Defense (Army), Department of Defense depots, Department of Defense installations with PFAS/PFOS contamination, Department of Defense military working dog facilities, Department of Defense programs of record, Department of Defense programs providing foreign language training or instruction to members of the Armed Forces, Department of the Air Force (including the Space Force), Eligible beneficiaries (members and dependents of covered Armed Forces), Eligible covered beneficiaries of the TRICARE program, Enlisted members with degrees in their field of specialty and less than 4 years of service, Female members of the Armed Forces and their female dependents enrolled in TRICARE Prime, High school seniors applying for Service Academies, Indo-Pacific allies and partners (Japan, Philippines, Australia), Lake City Army Ammunition Plant, Missouri, Medically disqualified entry-level service members, Members of the Armed Forces and their TRICARE-enrolled dependents, Members of the Armed Forces and their dependents enrolled in TRICARE, Members of the Armed Forces and their family members/caregivers, Members of the Armed Forces assigned to the United States Special Operations Command, Members of the Armed Forces in qualifying cyber operations roles, Members of the Armed Forces involved in Department of Defense cyber operations, Members of the Armed Forces taking parental leave exceeding 31 days, Members of the Armed Forces who smoke at least one cigarette per week, Members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Space Force performing qualifying cyber operations roles, Members of the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve, Members of the armed forces and their families, Members of the armed forces in occupational specialties with civilian equivalents, Members of the armed forces who have received special operations medical training, Members serving in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force, or their dependents, Military commanders responsible for planning operations and convening courts-martial, Military forces of Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), Military personnel and their families, Military personnel convicted of rape of a child, Military personnel experiencing family separation, Minor military construction projects, National Guard Bureau, National Guard and Reserve Forces, National Guard members and units, Naval installations, Navy, Navy personnel in occupational specialties, Potential enlistees into the Armed Forces who tested positive for tetrahydrocannabinol, Potential members of the armed forces, Reserve components of the Armed Forces, Space Force general officers, Space Force officers completing initial training, Space Force officers eligible for promotion to major general, Special Operations Forces, Surviving Gold Star Family Members of the Armed Forces, U.S. Army Research, Development, Test and Evaluation budget, U.S. Army museums and related entities, Uniformed Services Members, United States Air Force Academy

Negative-direction: Active duty military personnel and their dependents, Armed Forces members receiving beginner motorcycle safety training, Armed Forces personnel, Army Force Readiness Operations Support, Army Land Forces Systems Readiness program, Army Other Service Support, Army elements of the Major Range and Test Facility Base, Army maneuver units, Army units involved in Expeditionary Combat Aviation Brigades, Army's Joint Munitions Command and Army Sustainment Command, Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force, Commander of Joint Region Marianas, Commander of the United States European Command, Commander of the United States Indo-Pacific Command, Commanders of military installations, Commanders of unified combatant commands (excluding US Cyber Command), Commanding Officers of specified Air Force installations, Defense contractors and suppliers, Department of Defense and Secretaries of Military Departments, Department of Defense personnel, Department of Defense personnel involved in cyber operations, Department of Defense weapons platforms lacking onboard, real-time cybersecurity capabilities, Firefighters of Department of Defense, Male cadets and midshipmen at Service Academies, Members of the Armed Forces undergoing a permanent change of station during fiscal year 2025 or 2026, Members of the Armed Forces who sustain significant injury or illness, or are on sick call, Members of the Space Force, Members of the U.S. Military, Members of the military convicted of child pornography offenses, Military Installations experiencing greatest risks to water management and security, Military departments and their respective Service Academies, Military departments of the Department of Defense, Military families with minor dependent children, Military personnel, Military personnel convicted of voluntary manslaughter, Military recruiters and contractors, Military units using Link 16 systems, Minuteman III missile launch officers, support personnel and associated facilities, National Guard of each State, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, Personnel on military installations, Secretaries of military departments, Secretaries of the Navy and Air Force, participating nations in Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) and Return of Forces to the Pacific exercises, Secretary of a military department, Selected Special Operations Forces units, Selected Weapon System Platform Fleets (MH–60R, MQ–9, etc.), Space Force personnel, TRICARE program members and dependents, Transgender individuals and their dependents in the armed forces, U.S. Army Operation and Maintenance budget for Land Forces Systems Readiness, United States Indo-Pacific Command and Joint Task Force-Micronesia, United States Special Operations Command, Units of the Army Reserve Officers' Training Corps

Government
483 mentions across 480 clauses
+254 positive -145 negative ?1 uncertain

Afghanistan War Commission, Agencies involved in drug interdiction (Defense, Human Services, Justice), Air Force

Department of Defense, Department of Defense components (military departments and Defense Agencies), Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Navy face effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Afghanistan War Commission, Agencies involved in drug interdiction (Defense, Human Services, Justice), Civilian employees of the Department of Defense and Coast Guard, Customs and Border Protection, Defense Health Agency, Defense Health Agency and Military Departments, Defense Innovation Unit, Defense acquisition system, Defense laboratories, Department of Defense (excluding military departments), Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, Department of Defense acquisition workforce, Department of Defense and related entities, Department of Defense depots and arsenals, Department of Defense installations and locations inside the United States, Department of Defense installations and locations outside the United States, Department of Defense programs of record, Department of Defense, Department of State, Department of Defense, including Army Materiel Command and United States Special Operations Command, Department of Energy and Department of Defense, Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, Federal Communications Commission, Federal agencies and programs, Federal agencies excluding Department of Defense, Funding for Servicewomen’s Commemorative Partnership, Government agencies, Government agencies named in section 3063 of title 10, United States Code, Law enforcement agencies and other Federal agencies, Maritime Administration programs and operations, Military departments, other Federal agencies outside the Department of Defense, eligible non-Federal entities, Military units involved in Innovative Readiness Training program, Ministry of Defense, NATO member countries, National Defense Stockpile Manager, Secretary of Defense, Director of the Defense Logistics Agency, Navy's Military Family Housing Units, Relevant stakeholders in Authorization to Operate submission process, Senior Iranian security officials and members of the armed forces, State and local governments affected by Army Transformation Initiative, U.S. Department of Defense and relevant Congressional Committees, United States Department of Defense, United States Government offices

Negative-direction: Defense Commissary Agency, Defense Health Agency and relevant acquisition offices of the Department of Defense, Defense Innovation Unit, Department of Defense, Defense Logistics Agency, Department of Defense (DoD) and its military departments, Department of Defense Office of Inspector General, Department of Defense and Department of Energy, Department of Defense and Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, Department of Defense and its agencies, Department of Defense and its military departments, Department of Defense depots, Department of Defense employees and leadership, Department of Defense funds for fiscal year 2026, Department of Defense officials, Department of Defense personnel, Department of Defense personnel and relevant systems, Department of Defense personnel involved in international defense personnel exchange programs, Department of Defense procurement, Department of Defense procurement officers, Department of Defense, Department of Transportation, and Department of Homeland Security, Department of Energy and National Nuclear Security Administration, Executive agencies, Federal departments and agencies, Government Accountability Office, Government Agencies involved in past research (e.g., Department of Defense, National Institutes of Health), Government agencies procuring unmanned ground vehicle systems, Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State, Secretary of the Air Force, Chief of Space Operations, Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration, U.S. Department of Defense and State, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of State, Director of National Intelligence, and other relevant Federal departments and agencies, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of State, and Director of National Intelligence, Washington Headquarters Services

Defense
317 mentions across 308 clauses
+162 positive -104 negative ?3 uncertain

Air Force, Aircraft manufacturers and suppliers in Texas, Kansas, and other States, Army Operation and Maintenance for Additional Activities

Defense contractors and suppliers, Defense contractors and vendors, Department of Defense, Department of Defense personnel face effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Aircraft manufacturers and suppliers in Texas, Kansas, and other States, Army facilities and munitions industry, Arrow missile defense system manufacturers (US, Israel), Ballistic Missile Defense Targets, Business entities in the defense industry, Business entities seeking to improve technology capabilities of DoD, Contractors bidding on Department of Defense contracts, Contractors performing covered activities for defense programs, Contractors providing reparable goods or repair services for major weapon systems, Contractors seeking nuclear risk indemnification from DoD, Contractors working with Department of Defense, Contractors working with the Department of Defense, Defense Industrial Base entities, Defense acquisition programs, Defense acquisition system, Defense contractors, Defense contractors (prime and sub), Defense contractors and manufacturers, Defense contractors and manufacturers in the United States, Defense contractors and research institutions involved in unmanned systems technology, Defense contractors and system developers, Defense contractors bidding on vehicle procurements, Defense contractors, primes, startups, Federal labs, Defense industrial base companies and entities, Defense supply chain entities, Defense-Wide Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Department of Defense personnel and units using AI/ML systems, Department of Defense personnel involved in defense acquisition programs, Department of Defense personnel traveling with pets, Department of Defense, including Armed Forces Reserve Components, Domestically manufactured, defense-related component manufacturers, Eligible entities applying for or restructuring capital assistance under this subsection, Eligible entities receiving support for eligible investments, Eligible entities seeking capital assistance, Foreign Security Forces, Individuals appointed as product support managers, Industry and academia with expertise in small UAS manufacturing, engineering, testing, evaluation, modular manufacturing processes, commercial best practices, and business models, Israel's defense industry and government, Israeli companies, Lockheed Martin (F-35 contractor), Medically disqualified entry-level service members, Members of defense industrial consortiums, Members of the acquisition workforce, Military departments (Army, Navy, Air Force), Military departments and their respective major weapon systems, Military personnel and health professionals in the Armed Forces, Minuteman III ICBM program, Naval shipyards and defense contractors, Navy Senior Technical Authorities, Navy Shipbuilding and Conversion budget, Navy Shipyards, Partner countries (as defined), Potential suppliers to the Department of Defense, Product support managers of major defense acquisition programs, Product support managers of significant nonmajor defense acquisition programs, Selected Weapon System Platform Fleets, Service acquisition executives, Small business and non-traditional defense contractors, Smart Susceptor Technology Research, Development, Test and Evaluation program, Taiwan’s defense industrial base, Weapon system contractors and subcontractors

Negative-direction: Air Force, Army Operation and Maintenance for Additional Activities, Chief of Staff of the Army, in coordination with head of Army Aviation and Missile Command, Chinese military companies operating inside or outside of China, Cloud computing providers, data infrastructure providers, AI providers with >$50M in contracts over five years, Commercial vendors performing work for Department of Defense in support of clandestine activities, Commercial vendors performing work for DoD in support of clandestine activities, Contractors involved in undefinitized contractual actions, Contractors of the Department of Defense, Contractors providing permanent magnets to the Department of Defense, Countries interested in procuring weapons systems and defense equipment originating from the People’s Republic of China, Covered contractors and their first-tier subcontractors, Defense contractors providing reparable goods or services, Defense contractors with annual value exceeding $5,000,000 and grantees with annual revenue of $1,000,000,000 or more, Defense contractors with non-competitively awarded contracts, Defense contractors with price increases meeting specified thresholds, Defense industrial base manufacturers using non-domestic AM equipment, Department of Defense (DoD) personnel involved in F-35 sustainment, Department of Defense and its military departments and Defense Agencies, Department of Defense personnel involved in Joint Task Force-Southern Border, Director of the Joint Counter Small Unmanned Systems Office and Secretaries of military departments, Government agencies involved in defense procurement, Major defense acquisition programs performed through other transaction authority, Military departments, Naval contractors bidding for Modular Attack Surface Craft program, Naval vessel construction plans, Offerors of goods to the Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense and Secretaries of military departments, Operations and Maintenance budget for Washington Headquarters Services, Principal investigators and employees in covered defense research projects, Private entities offering subscription-based missile defense services, Private entities providing missile defense services, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Defense and Director of the Defense Logistics Agency, Secretary of Defense and Secretaries of military departments, Secretary of Defense, Secretaries of military departments, combatant commanders, Secretary of the Air Force, Secretary of the Army, US Army Corps of Engineers and related contractors

Transportation
52 mentions across 44 clauses
+25 positive -15 negative

Air Force units with A-10 aircraft, Air National Guard fighter squadrons, Army rotary-wing aircraft

Positive-direction: Air National Guard fighter squadrons, Army rotary-wing aircraft, Department of Defense maintenance personnel, Expeditionary Combat Aviation Brigades, Marine Corps rotary-wing and tiltrotor aircraft, Maritime Industrial Base Companies, Port authorities and operators, United States Air Force, Republic of Korea Air Force, Royal Australian Air Force, Vessel construction managers

Negative-direction: Air Force units with A-10 aircraft, Army-Servicewide Transportation, Department of Defense rotary wing aircraft operators, Military Rotary-Wing Aircraft, Naval Aviation Units in Florida, Port authorities and operators using Chinese-made port cranes, Skilled workforce for shipbuilding and maritime operations, Transportation service providers and transportation officers, United States shipyards, repair facilities, and supporting infrastructure

Education
49 mentions across 49 clauses
+36 positive -6 negative

Academic institutions, Academic institutions with established relationship with National Guard Bureau and strong military history program near major National Guard installations, Academic institutions with established relationships with the National Guard Bureau, strong academic programs in military history, and proximity to major National Guard installations

Positive-direction: Academic institutions, Academic institutions with established relationship with National Guard Bureau and strong military history program near major National Guard installations, Academic institutions with established relationships with the National Guard Bureau, strong academic programs in military history, and proximity to major National Guard installations, Community colleges with workforce programs, Eligible host institutions (institutions of higher education conducting research sponsored by the Department of Defense), Local Educational Agencies with higher concentrations of military children with severe disabilities, Military students pursuing STEM education, National Defense University, Private entities participating in Skillbridge offering positions in registered apprenticeship programs, Secondary Schools and Institutions of Higher Education, State educational agencies and local educational agencies, Students of Defense Dependent Schools, US Air Force Institute of Technology, United States Merchant Marine Academy

Negative-direction: Al Mustafa International University network and affiliated entities, Institutions of Higher Education with antisemitic demonstrations, Institutions of higher education receiving DOD funding and hosting Confucius Institutes, Institutions of higher education with covered partnerships with hostile foreign entities

Healthcare
31 mentions across 31 clauses
+13 positive -11 negative

Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, Children’s hospitals meeting specified criteria, Community health care providers

Positive-direction: Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, Children’s hospitals meeting specified criteria, Community health care providers, Defense Health Agency, Military medical treatment facilities

Negative-direction: Department of Defense military treatment facilities inside the United States, Healthcare Providers in the Department of Defense, Healthcare professionals from partner countries, Medical training institutions, Military health-care professionals

Manufacturing
28 mentions across 28 clauses
+16 positive -9 negative

Advanced or adaptive manufacturers, Companies producing advanced batteries with more than 95% electrode active material from sources owned by foreign entities of concern, Companies producing, developing, or providing OLED display technologies

Positive-direction: Advanced or adaptive manufacturers, Defense contractors and military departments, Defense industry manufacturers, Domestic entities capable of producing shipping containers, Private entities engaged in bioindustrial manufacturing or seeking to establish such facilities

Negative-direction: Companies producing advanced batteries with more than 95% electrode active material from sources owned by foreign entities of concern, Companies producing, developing, or providing OLED display technologies, Companies producing, developing, or providing OLED display technologies in foreign adversary countries or entities, Entities producing communications equipment or services for unmanned aircraft systems, cameras, and specified spectrum bands, Manufacturers and suppliers of advanced batteries, U.S. entities acquiring molybdenum

Real Estate
28 mentions across 28 clauses
+9 positive -9 negative

Air Force family housing units, Covered entities in the field of single-family housing, Department of Defense (DoD) housing units constructed after 1962

Positive-direction: Covered entities in the field of single-family housing, Department of Defense (DoD) housing units constructed after 1962, Military installations with family housing

Negative-direction: Landlords of privatized military housing, Privatized Military Housing Landlords, Privatized military housing owners/managers

664/664
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown
House Roll #262

On Passage

Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Ac…

Passed
231 Yea 196 Nay 5 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #261

On Motion to Recommit

Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Ac…

Failed
208 Yea 219 Nay 5 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #260

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Agreed to
430 Yea 3 Nay 4 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #259

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Failed
200 Yea 228 Nay 9 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #258

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Agreed to
219 Yea 211 Nay 7 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #257

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Failed
9 Yea 422 Nay 6 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #256

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Failed
60 Yea 370 Nay 7 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #255

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Failed
60 Yea 372 Nay 5 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #254

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Failed
194 Yea 236 Nay 6 Not Voting 1 Present
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #253

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Agreed to
222 Yea 210 Nay 5 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #252

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Agreed to
228 Yea 205 Nay 4 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #251

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Agreed to
224 Yea 208 Nay 4 Not Voting 1 Present
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #250

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Failed
209 Yea 224 Nay 4 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #249

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Agreed to
219 Yea 209 Nay 9 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #248

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Agreed to
221 Yea 210 Nay 6 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #247

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Agreed to
227 Yea 201 Nay 9 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #246

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Agreed to
221 Yea 207 Nay 9 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #245

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Agreed to
221 Yea 210 Nay 6 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025
House Roll #244

On Agreeing to the Amendment

Agreed to
261 Yea 167 Nay 9 Not Voting
Sep 10, 2025

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Defense Government Procurement Military Personnel Industrial Base
Actor Mappings
"jcs"
→ Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
"peo"
→ Department of Defense program executive officer
"secretary"
→ Secretary of Defense

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology