HR3718-119

Introduced

To reauthorize and amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Jun 4, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill reauthorizes and modernizes the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the primary law governing U.S. ocean fisheries. It requires federal fisheries management to account for climate change impacts on fish populations, mandates electronic monitoring technologies on fishing vessels, and creates new grant programs for coastal communities. The bill also strengthens protections against sexual harassment for fisheries observers and NOAA personnel.

Who Benefits and How

Commercial and recreational fishing industries benefit from more flexible stock rebuilding timelines, cooperative research programs, and reduced regulatory burdens when climate change (rather than overfishing) causes fish population declines. Coastal communities and working waterfronts receive up to $50 million annually in new grants to preserve fishing infrastructure and waterfront access. Indigenous and subsistence fishing communities gain formal federal recognition and two new tribal seats on the North Pacific Fishery Management Council. Electronic monitoring technology companies benefit from mandated adoption of their systems. NOAA employees and fisheries observers gain stronger sexual harassment reporting and protection mechanisms.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal taxpayers fund approximately $700-765 million annually in new appropriations for fisheries management, research programs, and grants. NOAA and the National Marine Fisheries Service must develop new climate vulnerability assessments, data modernization strategies, and monitoring contingency plans within tight deadlines. Regional Fishery Management Councils face new requirements to create climate resilience plans and meet stricter procedural standards. Traditional at-sea observer positions may be displaced as electronic monitoring expands across commercial fisheries.

Key Provisions

  • Requires climate change vulnerability assessments for all managed fish stocks every 5 years and mandates that Councils develop climate resilience plans
  • Establishes the Working Waterfronts Grant Program providing up to $50 million annually to preserve coastal fishing infrastructure
  • Modernizes stock rebuilding rules to account for non-fishing factors like climate change, potentially extending rebuilding timelines
  • Expands electronic monitoring requirements and establishes data standards to improve fisheries data collection and reduce reliance on human observers
  • Adds two tribal representatives to the North Pacific Fishery Management Council and formally recognizes subsistence fishing rights
  • Strengthens sexual harassment prevention policies for NOAA personnel and fisheries observers, including restricted reporting options

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Reauthorizes and substantially amends the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to integrate climate change considerations into fisheries management, improve data collection and electronic monitoring, support coastal communities and working waterfronts, and modernize rebuilding programs for depleted fish stocks.

Who Benefits

  • Commercial fishing industry (reduced regulatory burden, flexible rebuilding timelines, cooperative management)
  • Recreational fishing industry (improved data collection, better stock management)
  • Subsistence and Indigenous fishing communities (new federal recognition, protection of traditional practices)

Who Bears Costs

  • Federal taxpayers (new appropriations for grants, research programs, data modernization)
  • NOAA/NMFS (new reporting requirements, climate assessments, guideline development)
  • Regional Fishery Management Councils (new climate resilience plans, data standards compliance)

Key Policy Areas

Fisheries, Environment, Climate Change, Coastal Development, Marine Conservation, Data Collection, Federal Regulation

Primary Purpose

Reauthorizes and substantially amends the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to integrate climate change considerations into fisheries management, improve data collection and electronic monitoring, support coastal communities and working waterfronts, and modernize rebuilding programs for depleted fish stocks.

Policy Domains

Fisheries Environment Climate Change Coastal Development Marine Conservation Data Collection Federal Regulation

Legislative Strategy

"Modernize the 50-year-old Magnuson-Stevens Act to address climate change impacts on fisheries, improve data collection through electronic technologies, support coastal fishing communities, and reform stock rebuilding requirements to account for non-fishing factors"

Identified Gains

  • Commercial fishing industry (reduced regulatory burden, flexible rebuilding timelines, cooperative management)
  • Recreational fishing industry (improved data collection, better stock management)
  • Subsistence and Indigenous fishing communities (new federal recognition, protection of traditional practices)
  • Coastal communities (Working Waterfronts grants up to \M/year, infrastructure support)
  • NOAA employees and observers (sexual harassment protections)
  • Electronic monitoring technology companies (mandated use of electronic technologies)

Identified Costs

  • Federal taxpayers (new appropriations for grants, research programs, data modernization)
  • NOAA/NMFS (new reporting requirements, climate assessments, guideline development)
  • Regional Fishery Management Councils (new climate resilience plans, data standards compliance)
  • Traditional at-sea observer industry (potential job displacement from electronic monitoring)

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 4, 2025

Mr. Huffman (for himself, Mr. Moylan, and Mr. Case) introduced …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Fishing & Forestry
34 mentions across 29 clauses
+21 positive -7 negative ?6 uncertain

Charter fishing businesses, Coastal fishing communities, Commercial fisheries

Positive-direction: Coastal fishing communities, Commercial fishers affected by stock shifts, Commercial fishers operating in multi-region fisheries, Commercial fishing industry, Commercial fishing industry near wind areas, Commercial fishing infrastructure operators, Commercial fishing vessels, Commercial tuna fishing industry, Fishing communities, Fishing communities facing climate impacts, Historically underserved coastal communities, New fishery entrants, Northeast commercial fishing vessel operators, Predator fisheries (tuna, pollock), Recreational fishing industry, Recreational fishing industry (Atlantic tuna), Seafood industry, Short-lived species fisheries (squid, shrimp)

Negative-direction: Commercial fishing industry in overfished fisheries, Commercial fishing operations affecting habitat, Commercial fishing operations in sensitive habitats, Commercial fishing operations with high bycatch, Forage fish fisheries (menhaden, anchovy, sardine), Highly migratory species fisheries (excluding Atlantic tuna), Inshore mobile gear fishing operations (trawlers, dredgers)

Government
32 mentions across 24 clauses
+7 positive -23 negative ?2 uncertain

Fisheries observers and at-sea monitors, Law enforcement agencies, NOAA

NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Fisheries observers and at-sea monitors, Law enforcement agencies, NOAA employees and covered personnel, NOAA employees and fisheries observers, Pacific Insular Area governments (Guam, American Samoa, Northern Marianas), Regional Fishery Management Council staff

Negative-direction: NOAA, NOAA administration, NOAA personnel with merchant mariner credentials, NOAA/Secretary of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, Regional Fishery Management Councils, Secretary of Commerce/NOAA, USDA Agricultural Marketing Service

Research & Science
12 mentions across 11 clauses
+11 positive -1 negative

Climate research community, Climate research consultants, Climate research firms and consultants

Positive-direction: Climate research community, Climate research consultants, Climate research firms and consultants, Climate research organizations, Climate scientists, Climate scientists and ecosystem researchers, Climate vulnerability research organizations, Fisheries research and management contractors, Marine research organizations, Marine scientists specializing in highly migratory species, Shark research organizations

Negative-direction: Scientific and statistical committees

Environment
8 mentions across 8 clauses
+7 positive -1 negative

At-sea observer industry, Conservation organizations, Marine conservation organizations

Positive-direction: Conservation organizations, Marine conservation organizations, Marine ecosystem conservation organizations, Marine habitat conservation advocates

Negative-direction: At-sea observer industry

Indigenous Communities
6 mentions across 4 clauses
+6 positive

Alaska Federation of Natives, Alaska Native tribes, Indian Tribes

Technology
5 mentions across 4 clauses
+5 positive

AI and cloud services providers, Autonomous survey technology providers, Data management and technology contractors

State & Local Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+2 positive -1 negative

Coastal state governments, State fisheries agencies, State fisheries data programs

Positive-direction: Coastal state governments, State fisheries data programs

Negative-direction: State fisheries agencies

Education
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Universities and research institutions, Virginia Institute of Marine Science

47/60
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Fisheries Climate Change Marine Conservation
Actor Mappings
"the_council"
→ Regional Fishery Management Councils
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Commerce
"the_administrator"
→ Administrator of NOAA
Domains
Fisheries Coastal Development Subsistence
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Commerce
Domains
Workplace Safety Federal Employment
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Commerce
"the_under_secretary"
→ Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere
Domains
Fisheries Data Collection Research Technology
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Commerce
"the_administrator"
→ Administrator of NOAA
"the_assistant_administrator"
→ Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
Domains
Fisheries Marine Conservation Stock Management
Actor Mappings
"the_council"
→ Regional Fishery Management Councils
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Commerce

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

6 terms
"Administrator" §4

The Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

"Subsistence fishing" §201

Fishing in which the fish harvested are intended for customary and traditional uses, including for direct or sharing personal, family, or community consumption, for making handicraft articles, for barter, and for customary trade

"Covered personnel" §3552

Individuals who work with or conduct business on behalf of NOAA including observers, at-sea monitors, catch monitors, and Council staff

"Council" §4_council

Has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1802) - refers to Regional Fishery Management Councils

"Secretary" §4_secretary

The Secretary of Commerce

"Working waterfront" §202_working_waterfront

Waterfront infrastructure supporting commercial fishing, recreational fishing/boating, aquaculture, boatbuilding, or water-dependent coastal business

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology