Golden Mussel Eradication and Control Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Golden Mussel Eradication and Control Act amends the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act. The Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, with state and local entities, port authorities, industry partners, universities, and nonprofits, must develop a demonstration program for prevention, monitoring, control, eradication, education, and research on the golden mussel. The program must research biology, environmental tolerances, effects on fisheries, water quality, and ecosystems, control technologies, dispersal tracking, early warning systems, methods and plans for derelict vessels, public infrastructure, fish screens, waterways, hull inspections, and technical assistance. It applies in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and any other U.S. waters the Task Force finds infested or likely to become infested. The Task Force must share control and eradication information with state and local entities and port authorities, issue guidelines within one year including watercraft inspection stations, establish competitive grants for state and local entities, institutions of higher education, nonprofits, and industry partners to test control and removal technologies or study golden mussel biology, and may enter agreements for use or sale of new technologies. It can delegate implementation to qualified agencies or entities and authorizes $15 million annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Who Benefits and How
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta water users benefit from prevention, monitoring, early warning, and eradication work targeting golden mussels. Water infrastructure operators benefit from technologies to remove mussels from intakes, conveyance infrastructure, fish screens, and waterways. State invasive-species agencies benefit from federal guidelines, technical assistance, grants, and shared control methods. Universities and nonprofits benefit from grant opportunities for containment science and control technology research.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force staff must develop the demonstration program, guidelines, grants, reports, and delegation decisions. Port authorities and local agencies may need to implement watercraft inspection and control plans. Industry partners receiving grants must test technologies and comply with agreements for use or sale. Federal taxpayers fund $15 million per year through fiscal year 2030.
Key Provisions
- Creates a golden mussel demonstration program for prevention, monitoring, control, eradication, education, and research.
- Requires implementation in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and other infested or at-risk waters.
- Requires guidelines within one year, including watercraft inspection stations.
- Creates competitive grants for control technology, removal methods, biology, and containment science.
- Authorizes $15 million annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Creates a $15 million-per-year golden mussel demonstration, grant, research, monitoring, early warning, control, eradication, education, technical-assistance, watercraft-inspection, and technology-transfer program for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and other infested or at-risk U.S. waters.
Key Policy Areas
Invasive Species, Water Infrastructure, Environmental Protection
Primary Purpose
Creates a $15 million-per-year golden mussel demonstration, grant, research, monitoring, early warning, control, eradication, education, technical-assistance, watercraft-inspection, and technology-transfer program for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and other infested or at-risk U.S. waters.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta water users
- Water infrastructure operators
- State invasive-species agencies
- Universities
- Nonprofit organizations
Identified Costs
- Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force staff
- Port authorities
- Industry partners
- Federal taxpayers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
Mr. Harder of California (for himself, Mr. Garamendi, Ms. Matsui, …
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in …
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology