HR3716-119

Passed House

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require reports on the use of the systemic risk authority applicable to winding up a failed insured depository institution, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Jun 4, 2025

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 2, 2025

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, …

Dec 2, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Jul 15, 2025

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …

Jun 4, 2025

Mr. Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was …

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill requires the GAO to review and report to Congress within 60 days (and again at 180 days) whenever the FDIC invokes systemic risk authority to wind up a failed bank, covering the basis for determination and management failures.

Who Benefits and How

Congress and the public benefit from transparency on systemic risk determinations. Depositors benefit from clearer understanding of bank failure decisions.

Who Bears the Burden and How

GAO must conduct rapid reviews. FDIC faces increased oversight and accountability for systemic risk decisions.

Key Provisions

  • GAO review within 60 days of systemic risk determination
  • Follow-up report at 180 days
  • Must cover basis for determination and bank mismanagement
Model: claude-opus-4
Generated: Jan 16, 2026 19:41

Evidence Chain:

This summary is derived from the structured analysis below. See "Detailed Analysis" for per-title beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

Primary Purpose

Requires GAO reports on FDIC systemic risk authority use when winding up failed banks

Policy Domains

Banking Financial Regulation

Main Bill

Likely Beneficiaries
  • Congress
  • Depositors
  • General public
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: eh

Inferred from context, no direct clause evidence

Likely Burden Bearers
  • GAO
  • FDIC
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: eh

Inferred from context, no direct clause evidence

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Banking Financial Regulation

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology