HR3714-119

In Committee

Forage Fish Conservation Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Jun 4, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Forage Fish Conservation Act integrates forage fish into federal fisheries management. It adds findings that small schooling fish transfer energy from plankton to higher trophic predators such as tuna, Alaska pollock, marine mammals, and birds, and that population swings can alter ecosystems. Within 12 months, the Commerce Secretary, with fishery council advice, must define forage fish using factors such as low trophic level, small to intermediate size, schooling behavior, contribution to predator diets, and energy transfer. Scientific and statistical committees must advise councils on maintaining sufficient abundance, diversity, and localized distribution of forage fish. Councils must identify unmanaged forage fish and recommend prohibiting new directed fisheries until they review best science, assess effects on existing fisheries, fishing communities, and ecosystems, decide whether management is needed, submit a fishery management plan or amendment if needed, and receive final approved regulations. Annual catch limits for forage fish must account for the diet needs of fish, marine mammals, and birds that rely on them. Commerce must issue implementing guidelines within 18 months after workshops with councils, scientific, fisheries, and conservation interests. The bill also requires Commerce within 180 days to amend Atlantic herring and Atlantic mackerel, squid, and butterfish plans to add river herring and shad as managed stocks, complete further amendments within one year, and provide at least one observer or equivalent electronic/video monitoring on at least 50 percent of relevant mid-water trawl trips.

Who Benefits and How

Marine ecosystem managers benefit from explicit forage fish abundance, diversity, distribution, and predator-diet management requirements. Commercial fisheries that depend on tuna, pollock, and other predators benefit if forage prey is managed to support food webs. River herring and shad conservation advocates benefit because those species must be added to Atlantic fishery management plans. Marine mammal and seabird conservation organizations benefit from catch limits that account for predator diet needs.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Commerce fisheries staff must define forage fish, issue guidelines, conduct workshops, and amend Atlantic fishery plans. Regional fishery management councils must list unmanaged forage fish and restrict new directed fisheries until reviews and plans are complete. Mid-water trawl vessels in Atlantic herring and mackerel fisheries face expanded observer or electronic monitoring coverage. Forage fish harvesters may face delayed or restricted entry into new directed fisheries.

Key Provisions

  • Requires Commerce to define forage fish within 12 months using ecological criteria.
  • Requires scientific advice on forage fish abundance, diversity, and localized distribution.
  • Blocks new directed unmanaged forage fish fisheries until councils complete science review and approved management steps.
  • Requires annual catch limits to account for predator diet needs.
  • Requires Commerce guidelines within 18 months after stakeholder workshops.
  • Adds river herring and shad to Atlantic fishery plans and requires at-sea monitoring for at least 50 percent of relevant trips.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Amends the Magnuson-Stevens Act to define and manage forage fish, require science advice on forage fish abundance and distribution, block new directed fisheries for unmanaged forage fish until councils complete scientific review and approved management plans, require annual catch limits to account for predator diet needs, issue Commerce guidelines within 18 months, and add river herring and shad to Atlantic fishery management plans with at-sea monitoring for at least half of relevant mid-water trawl trips.

Key Policy Areas

Fisheries, Marine Conservation, Commerce

Primary Purpose

Amends the Magnuson-Stevens Act to define and manage forage fish, require science advice on forage fish abundance and distribution, block new directed fisheries for unmanaged forage fish until councils complete scientific review and approved management plans, require annual catch limits to account for predator diet needs, issue Commerce guidelines within 18 months, and add river herring and shad to Atlantic fishery management plans with at-sea monitoring for at least half of relevant mid-water trawl trips.

Policy Domains

Fisheries Marine Conservation Commerce

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Marine ecosystem managers
  • Predator-dependent fisheries
  • River herring advocates
  • Marine mammal organizations
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
River herring advocates: , , ,
Marine ecosystem managers: , , ,
Marine mammal organizations: , , ,
Predator-dependent fisheries: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Commerce fisheries staff
  • Regional fishery councils
  • Mid-water trawl vessels
  • Forage fish harvesters
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Forage fish harvesters: , , ,
Mid-water trawl vessels: , , ,
Commerce fisheries staff: , , ,
Regional fishery councils: , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 4, 2025

Mrs. Dingell (for herself and Mr. Mast) introduced the following …

Jun 4, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Jun 4, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Fisheries
20 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive -12 negative ?4 uncertain

Forage fish harvesters, Marine ecosystem managers, Mid-water trawl vessels

Positive-direction: Predator-dependent fisheries

Negative-direction: Forage fish harvesters, Mid-water trawl vessels, Regional fishery councils

Environment
8 mentions across 4 clauses
+8 positive

Marine mammal organizations, River herring advocates

Government
4 mentions across 4 clauses
-4 negative

Commerce fisheries staff

4/9
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Fisheries Marine Conservation Commerce

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology