HR3668-119

Passed House

Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act

119th Congress Introduced Jun 2, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act centralizes federal environmental review for natural gas pipeline and LNG authorization decisions. When FERC acts as lead agency under the Natural Gas Act for authorizations under section 3 or certificates under section 7, it must be the only lead agency for project-related NEPA review. FERC must identify, within 30 days after receiving an application, federal agencies, state agencies, local governments, and Indian tribes that may issue a federal authorization or must consult with FERC. FERC must invite those entities within 45 days and designate participating agencies within 60 days unless they disclaim jurisdiction, expertise, or intent to comment. Agencies not designated as participating agencies may not request or conduct supplemental NEPA review unless they show legal necessity and a need for information unavailable during FERC's review, and FERC may not consider comments from nonparticipating agencies in the project-related NEPA record. The bill also removes Clean Water Act section 401 certification requirements for covered federal authorizations.

Who Benefits and How

Natural gas pipeline developers, LNG export terminal developers, pipeline construction contractors, FERC certificate applicants, project-finance lenders, natural gas shippers, third-party environmental consultants, and FERC permitting staff benefit because the bill creates one lead NEPA review, tighter deadlines for participating agencies, fewer supplemental reviews, and less state water-certification leverage over covered natural gas authorizations.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff, Environmental Protection Agency reviewers, state environmental agencies, local permitting offices, Indian tribes with consultation interests, state water-quality agencies, environmental advocacy organizations, communities along proposed pipeline routes, and agencies that miss participating-agency deadlines bear burdens because their separate NEPA review authority is narrowed, comments can be excluded, section 401 certification leverage is removed, and FERC must coordinate the full project-related record on a compressed schedule.

Key Provisions

  • Requires FERC to be the only lead agency for project-related NEPA review of covered Natural Gas Act authorizations and certificates.
  • Requires FERC to identify potential participating agencies within 30 days and invite them within 45 days.
  • Requires participating-agency designations within 60 days unless an agency disclaims jurisdiction, expertise, or intent to comment.
  • Prohibits nonparticipating agencies from conducting supplemental NEPA review absent legal necessity and unavailable information.
  • Removes Clean Water Act section 401 certification requirements for the covered federal authorizations.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Makes FERC the sole lead agency for project-related NEPA review of Natural Gas Act section 3 authorizations and section 7 certificates, requires early participating-agency identification, restricts supplemental NEPA reviews by nonparticipating agencies, and removes Clean Water Act section 401 certification for covered federal authorizations.

Key Policy Areas

Energy, Permitting, Natural Gas

Primary Purpose

Makes FERC the sole lead agency for project-related NEPA review of Natural Gas Act section 3 authorizations and section 7 certificates, requires early participating-agency identification, restricts supplemental NEPA reviews by nonparticipating agencies, and removes Clean Water Act section 401 certification for covered federal authorizations.

Policy Domains

Energy Permitting Natural Gas

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Natural gas pipeline developers
  • LNG export terminal developers
  • Pipeline construction contractors
  • FERC certificate applicants
  • Project-finance lenders
  • Natural gas shippers
  • Third-party environmental consultants
  • FERC permitting staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Natural gas shippers:
FERC permitting staff:
Project-finance lenders:
FERC certificate applicants:
LNG export terminal developers:
Natural gas pipeline developers:
Pipeline construction contractors:
Third-party environmental consultants:
Identified Costs
  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff
  • Environmental Protection Agency reviewers
  • State environmental agencies
  • Local permitting offices
  • Indian tribes with consultation interests
  • State water-quality agencies
  • Environmental advocacy organizations
  • Communities along proposed pipeline routes
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Local permitting offices:
State environmental agencies:
State water-quality agencies:
Environmental advocacy organizations:
Environmental Protection Agency reviewers:
Indian tribes with consultation interests:
Communities along proposed pipeline routes:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff:

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 15, 2025

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, …

Dec 15, 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Dec 15, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Dec 12, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Dec 12, 2025

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - …

Dec 12, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas …

Dec 12, 2025

On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: …

Dec 12, 2025

The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered …

Dec 12, 2025

Mr. Landsman moved to recommit to the Committee on Energy …

Dec 12, 2025

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Oil & Gas
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

LNG export terminal developers, Natural gas pipeline developers

Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
-1 negative ?1 uncertain

Environmental Protection Agency reviewers, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff

State & Local Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
?2 uncertain

Indian tribes with consultation interests, State environmental agencies

Construction
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Pipeline construction contractors

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Communities along proposed pipeline routes

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown
House Roll #334

On Passage

Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act

Passed
213 Yea 184 Nay 36 Not Voting
Dec 12, 2025
House Roll #333

On Motion to Recommit

Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act

Failed
194 Yea 204 Nay 34 Not Voting
Dec 12, 2025

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Energy Permitting Natural Gas
Actor Mappings
"commission"
→ Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
"nepa_review"
→ National Environmental Policy Act review

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology