Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act centralizes federal environmental review for natural gas pipeline and LNG authorization decisions. When FERC acts as lead agency under the Natural Gas Act for authorizations under section 3 or certificates under section 7, it must be the only lead agency for project-related NEPA review. FERC must identify, within 30 days after receiving an application, federal agencies, state agencies, local governments, and Indian tribes that may issue a federal authorization or must consult with FERC. FERC must invite those entities within 45 days and designate participating agencies within 60 days unless they disclaim jurisdiction, expertise, or intent to comment. Agencies not designated as participating agencies may not request or conduct supplemental NEPA review unless they show legal necessity and a need for information unavailable during FERC's review, and FERC may not consider comments from nonparticipating agencies in the project-related NEPA record. The bill also removes Clean Water Act section 401 certification requirements for covered federal authorizations.
Who Benefits and How
Natural gas pipeline developers, LNG export terminal developers, pipeline construction contractors, FERC certificate applicants, project-finance lenders, natural gas shippers, third-party environmental consultants, and FERC permitting staff benefit because the bill creates one lead NEPA review, tighter deadlines for participating agencies, fewer supplemental reviews, and less state water-certification leverage over covered natural gas authorizations.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff, Environmental Protection Agency reviewers, state environmental agencies, local permitting offices, Indian tribes with consultation interests, state water-quality agencies, environmental advocacy organizations, communities along proposed pipeline routes, and agencies that miss participating-agency deadlines bear burdens because their separate NEPA review authority is narrowed, comments can be excluded, section 401 certification leverage is removed, and FERC must coordinate the full project-related record on a compressed schedule.
Key Provisions
- Requires FERC to be the only lead agency for project-related NEPA review of covered Natural Gas Act authorizations and certificates.
- Requires FERC to identify potential participating agencies within 30 days and invite them within 45 days.
- Requires participating-agency designations within 60 days unless an agency disclaims jurisdiction, expertise, or intent to comment.
- Prohibits nonparticipating agencies from conducting supplemental NEPA review absent legal necessity and unavailable information.
- Removes Clean Water Act section 401 certification requirements for the covered federal authorizations.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Makes FERC the sole lead agency for project-related NEPA review of Natural Gas Act section 3 authorizations and section 7 certificates, requires early participating-agency identification, restricts supplemental NEPA reviews by nonparticipating agencies, and removes Clean Water Act section 401 certification for covered federal authorizations.
Key Policy Areas
Energy, Permitting, Natural Gas
Primary Purpose
Makes FERC the sole lead agency for project-related NEPA review of Natural Gas Act section 3 authorizations and section 7 certificates, requires early participating-agency identification, restricts supplemental NEPA reviews by nonparticipating agencies, and removes Clean Water Act section 401 certification for covered federal authorizations.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Natural gas pipeline developers
- LNG export terminal developers
- Pipeline construction contractors
- FERC certificate applicants
- Project-finance lenders
- Natural gas shippers
- Third-party environmental consultants
- FERC permitting staff
Identified Costs
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff
- Environmental Protection Agency reviewers
- State environmental agencies
- Local permitting offices
- Indian tribes with consultation interests
- State water-quality agencies
- Environmental advocacy organizations
- Communities along proposed pipeline routes
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed HouseReceived; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, …
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …
Passed House (inferred from eh version)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - …
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas …
On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: …
The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered …
Mr. Landsman moved to recommit to the Committee on Energy …
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
LNG export terminal developers, Natural gas pipeline developers
Environmental Protection Agency reviewers, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff
Indian tribes with consultation interests, State environmental agencies
On Passage
Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act
On Motion to Recommit
Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "commission"
- → Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- "nepa_review"
- → National Environmental Policy Act review
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology