HR3617-119

Passed House

Securing America’s Critical Minerals Supply Act

119th Congress Introduced May 29, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Securing America's Critical Minerals Supply Act amends the Department of Energy Organization Act so DOE's mission includes ensuring an adequate and reliable supply of critical energy resources. It defines critical energy resources as energy resources essential to the U.S. energy sector and energy systems whose supply chains are vulnerable to disruption. The Secretary of Energy must consult with appropriate federal agencies, energy-sector representatives, states, and other stakeholders to conduct ongoing assessments of resource criticality, U.S. supply-chain vulnerability, domestic supply-chain diversity, monopolistic behavior, single points of failure, market manipulation, production capacity constraints, shortages of material or labor, federal regulations affecting domestic production or importation, import reliance, and adversarial nations' use of anticompetitive practices, price manipulation, or human-rights abuses in critical resource production. DOE must facilitate strategies to diversify supply sources, increase domestic production, separation, and processing, develop substitutes and alternatives, improve reuse and recycling technology, and report to House Energy and Commerce and Senate Energy and Natural Resources within two years.

Who Benefits and How

Domestic critical mineral producers, mineral separation facilities, critical-resource processors, battery manufacturers, grid equipment manufacturers, energy technology developers, electric utilities, recycling technology firms, state energy offices, House Energy Committee staff, and Senate Energy Committee staff benefit because the bill makes supply-chain resilience a DOE mission, creates recurring assessments of chokepoints and adversarial behavior, and pushes strategies for domestic production, processing, substitutes, recycling, and diversified supply.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Secretary of Energy, DOE supply-chain analysts, federal regulatory agencies, state energy agencies, energy-sector representatives asked for data, domestic producers subject to capacity assessments, importers relying on vulnerable sources, adversarial-country suppliers, and taxpayers bear burdens because the bill requires consultation, ongoing assessments, analysis of regulations and market behavior, strategy development, and a two-year congressional report on actions taken after those assessments.

Key Provisions

  • Adds a critical energy resource definition to the Department of Energy Organization Act.
  • Amends DOE's mission to require an adequate and reliable supply of critical energy resources essential to U.S. energy security.
  • Requires DOE to assess domestic supply-chain vulnerability, diversity, capacity constraints, import reliance, regulations, and adversarial market behavior.
  • Directs DOE to develop strategies for diversified supply, domestic production, separation, processing, substitutes, reuse, and recycling.
  • Requires a two-year congressional report describing assessment status and any resulting regulations, guidance, or actions.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Adds critical energy resource security to the Department of Energy's statutory mission, defines critical energy resources as energy resources essential to U.S. energy systems with vulnerable supply chains, and requires ongoing DOE assessments, strategies, and congressional reporting on domestic supply-chain resilience, adversarial market behavior, recycling, substitutes, and domestic production.

Key Policy Areas

Energy, Critical Minerals, Supply Chain

Primary Purpose

Adds critical energy resource security to the Department of Energy's statutory mission, defines critical energy resources as energy resources essential to U.S. energy systems with vulnerable supply chains, and requires ongoing DOE assessments, strategies, and congressional reporting on domestic supply-chain resilience, adversarial market behavior, recycling, substitutes, and domestic production.

Policy Domains

Energy Critical Minerals Supply Chain

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Domestic critical mineral producers
  • Mineral separation facilities
  • Critical-resource processors
  • Battery manufacturers
  • Grid equipment manufacturers
  • Energy technology developers
  • Electric utilities
  • Recycling technology firms
  • State energy offices
  • House Energy Committee staff
  • Senate Energy Committee staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Electric utilities: , , ,
State energy offices: , , ,
Battery manufacturers: , , ,
Recycling technology firms: , , ,
Critical-resource processors: , , ,
Energy technology developers: , , ,
Grid equipment manufacturers: , , ,
House Energy Committee staff: , , ,
Mineral separation facilities: , , ,
Senate Energy Committee staff: , , ,
Domestic critical mineral producers: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Secretary of Energy
  • DOE supply-chain analysts
  • Federal regulatory agencies
  • State energy agencies
  • Energy-sector representatives asked for data
  • Domestic producers subject to capacity assessments
  • Importers relying on vulnerable sources
  • Adversarial-country suppliers
  • Taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Taxpayers: , , ,
Secretary of Energy: , , ,
State energy agencies: , , ,
DOE supply-chain analysts: , , ,
Federal regulatory agencies: , , ,
Adversarial-country suppliers: , , ,
Importers relying on vulnerable sources: , , ,
Energy-sector representatives asked for data: , , ,
Domestic producers subject to capacity assessments: , , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 12, 2026

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Feb 12, 2026

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy …

Feb 11, 2026

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Feb 11, 2026

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 223 - …

Feb 11, 2026

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas …

Feb 11, 2026

On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: …

Feb 11, 2026

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2167-2169)

Feb 11, 2026

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. …

Feb 11, 2026

The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered …

Feb 11, 2026

Mr. Landsman moved to recommit to the Committee on Energy …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
22 mentions across 8 clauses
-16 negative ?6 uncertain

DOE supply-chain analysts, Department of Energy, Federal regulatory agencies

Energy
8 mentions across 8 clauses
+8 positive

Domestic critical mineral producers, Mineral separation facilities

Technology
8 mentions across 8 clauses
+8 positive

Energy technology developers, Recycling technology firms

Utilities
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive

Electric utilities

State & Local Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

State energy offices

Manufacturing
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Critical-resource processors

Foreign Affairs
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Adversarial-country suppliers

1/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Energy Critical Minerals Supply Chain
Actor Mappings
"secretary"
→ Secretary of Energy
"critical_energy_resource"
→ energy resource essential to U.S. energy systems with a supply chain vulnerable to disruption

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology