HR3613-119

Introduced

To amend the Arms Export Control Act to streamline Foreign Military Sales under that Act.

119th Congress Introduced May 23, 2025

At a Glance

Read full bill text

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
May 23, 2025

Mr. Zinke (for himself and Mr. Panetta) introduced the following …

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Streamlining Foreign Military Sales Act of 2025 raises the dollar thresholds that trigger congressional notification requirements when the U.S. government sells weapons to foreign countries. Currently, Congress must be notified when arms sales exceed certain dollar amounts (ranging from $250,000 to $300 million depending on the type of sale). This bill doubles or even quadruples those thresholds, allowing sales worth millions more to proceed without congressional review.

Who Benefits and How

Defense contractors are the primary beneficiaries. Companies like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, and General Dynamics will be able to close weapons deals more quickly because fewer sales will require the 30-day congressional waiting period. This faster approval process means more revenue and reduced administrative costs for the defense industry. Foreign governments purchasing U.S. weapons also benefit through streamlined procurement processes, getting their military equipment faster without congressional scrutiny potentially delaying or blocking sales.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Congressional oversight is significantly weakened. The House Foreign Affairs Committee and Senate Foreign Relations Committee will receive far fewer notifications about pending arms sales, meaning they have less opportunity to review, question, or block controversial weapons transfers. This particularly affects sales to countries with questionable human rights records. Arms control advocates and human rights organizations also lose transparency and leverage, as more sales will happen below the radar. American taxpayers may bear indirect costs if weapons sales to unstable regions later require U.S. military intervention.

Key Provisions

  • Raises the smallest notification threshold from $250,000 to $500,000 for certain defense articles and services
  • Increases the threshold for major defense equipment sales from $14 million to $30 million across multiple sections
  • Doubles the highest tier threshold from $300 million to $615 million for the largest weapons packages
  • Adjusts intermediate thresholds proportionally, with most doubling (e.g., $50M to $105M, $100M to $205M, $200M to $410M)
  • Applies changes across at least 15 different sections of the Arms Export Control Act, covering various types of sales, transfers, and leases
Model: claude-opus-4-5-20251101
Generated: Dec 24, 2025 05:40

Evidence Chain:

This summary is derived from the structured analysis below. See "Detailed Analysis" for per-title beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

Primary Purpose

Streamlines Foreign Military Sales by raising dollar thresholds that trigger congressional notification requirements under the Arms Export Control Act

Policy Domains

Defense Foreign Policy Military Exports

Legislative Strategy

"Reduce congressional oversight of foreign military sales by raising notification thresholds, allowing more sales to proceed without congressional review"

Likely Beneficiaries

  • Defense contractors (increased sales velocity)
  • Foreign governments purchasing U.S. weapons (faster approval)
  • Executive branch (reduced congressional oversight)

Likely Burden Bearers

  • Congressional oversight (less visibility into smaller sales)
  • Arms control advocates (reduced transparency)
  • Human rights groups (less scrutiny of sales to questionable regimes)

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Defense Foreign Policy Military Exports

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology