Reducing Waste in National Parks Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Reducing Waste in National Parks Act directs the National Park Service Director to establish a disposable plastic reduction program within 180 days. Regional directors must implement the program by eliminating the sale of water in disposable plastic products and reducing or eliminating other disposable plastic products to the greatest extent feasible. Before doing so, they must consider operational costs and benefits, expected waste reduction, bottle-refill infrastructure costs and funding, concessioner contract implications, concessioner possessory interests, station operating costs, utility and public-health testing needs, availability and cost of BPA-free reusable containers, effects on concessioner and cooperating-association sales revenue, water availability in concession food service, visitor education, public-health input, signs, safety risks from dehydration or drinking untreated surface water, and concessioner or cooperating-association input. Units already not selling water in disposable plastic bottles may continue. Regional directors must create visitor education strategies, implement the program consistently across the unit including concessioner operating plans and cooperating-association scopes of sales, and evaluate every two years public response, visitor satisfaction, purchasing behavior, safety incidents, and disposable plastic collection rates.
Who Benefits and How
National park visitors benefit from more refill infrastructure and clearer education about avoiding disposable plastic waste. Park ecosystems benefit if disposable plastic bottle, bag, and food-ware waste declines. Reusable container suppliers benefit from demand for BPA-free refillable bottles and alternatives. Waste-reduction organizations benefit from a statutory program targeting plastic use across National Park System units.
Who Bears the Burden and How
National Park Service regional directors must analyze feasibility, implement reductions, educate visitors, and evaluate outcomes every two years. Park concessioners may lose bottled-water or plastic-product sales and must adjust operating plans. Cooperating associations may need to change scopes of sales and visitor-facing merchandise. Federal taxpayers and park units may bear refill station, utility, public-health testing, signage, and implementation costs.
Key Provisions
- Requires NPS to establish a disposable plastic reduction program within 180 days.
- Requires elimination of disposable plastic water bottle sales where feasible.
- Requires feasibility review of costs, refill infrastructure, contracts, safety, public health, and concessioner impacts.
- Requires visitor education and consistent implementation through concessioner and cooperating-association plans.
- Requires biennial evaluation of public response, visitor satisfaction, safety, purchasing behavior, and plastic collection rates.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires the National Park Service to reduce and, where feasible, eliminate sale or distribution of disposable plastic products at park units, beginning with disposable plastic water bottles, while requiring concessioner coordination, refill infrastructure analysis, visitor education, safety review, and biennial evaluations.
Key Policy Areas
National Parks, Environment, Tourism
Primary Purpose
Requires the National Park Service to reduce and, where feasible, eliminate sale or distribution of disposable plastic products at park units, beginning with disposable plastic water bottles, while requiring concessioner coordination, refill infrastructure analysis, visitor education, safety review, and biennial evaluations.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- National park visitors
- Park ecosystems
- Reusable container suppliers
- Waste-reduction organizations
Identified Costs
- NPS regional directors
- Park concessioners
- Cooperating associations
- Federal taxpayers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Quigley introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
National park visitors, Park concessioners
Positive-direction: National park visitors
Negative-direction: Park concessioners
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology