HR3565-118

Reported

To authorize the Federal Communications Commission to use a system of competitive bidding to grant a license or a permit for use of electromagnetic spectrum and to direct proceeds from such a system of competitive bidding for communications and technology initiatives, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced May 22, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

Extends FCC authority to conduct spectrum auctions and creates process for federal-commercial spectrum sharing. Addresses relocation costs and Defense Department spectrum.

Who Benefits and How

  • Wireless industry gains access to additional spectrum
  • Federal government receives compensation for spectrum sharing
  • Consumers benefit from expanded wireless capacity

Who Bears the Burden and How

  • Federal agencies must accommodate commercial spectrum sharing
  • DOD reports on spectrum relocation payments
  • FCC and NTIA coordinate spectrum management

Key Provisions

  • Reauthorizes spectrum auction authority
  • Enables non-Federal and shared Federal use auctions
  • Creates relocation cost framework
  • Defense Department reporting on spectrum payments

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Reauthorizes FCC spectrum auction authority and establishes framework for federal spectrum sharing

Who Benefits

  • Wireless industry
  • Federal government
  • Consumers

Who Bears Costs

  • Federal agencies
  • DOD
  • FCC/NTIA

Key Policy Areas

Telecommunications, Spectrum, Technology

Primary Purpose

Reauthorizes FCC spectrum auction authority and establishes framework for federal spectrum sharing

Policy Domains

Telecommunications Spectrum Technology

Legislative Strategy

"Enable commercial spectrum expansion through auction reauthorization"

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Aug 13, 2024

Reported from the Committee on Energy and Commerce with an …

Aug 13, 2024

Additional sponsors: Mrs. Lesko, Mr. Thanedar, and Mr. Nickel

Aug 13, 2024

Committee on Armed Services discharged; committed to the Committee of …

May 22, 2023

Mrs. Rodgers of Washington (for herself and Mr. Pallone) introduced …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
17 mentions across 11 clauses
+2 positive -15 negative

CISA, FCC, Federal spectrum users

Positive-direction: U.S. Treasury, U.S. Treasury (deficit reduction)

Negative-direction: CISA, FCC, Federal spectrum users, Federal spectrum users (DoD, etc.), NTIA

State & Local Government
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive

State 911 authorities, State and local 911 authorities, State and local 911 centers

Telecommunications
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive

Commercial spectrum users, Commercial wireless carriers, Minority broadband programs

Education
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

HBCUs and minority-serving institutions, Tribal colleges

Technology
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

NG911 technology vendors

Law Enforcement
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Public safety officials (law enforcement, fire, EMS)

Minority Communities
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Underserved minority communities

17/17
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Telecommunications Spectrum
Actor Mappings
"assistant_secretary"
→ Assistant Secretary of Commerce

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology