HR3515-119

Introduced

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude military bonuses from gross income.

119th Congress Introduced May 20, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 1. Exclusion of military bonuses Subsection (a) of section 134 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking any qualified military benefit and inserting. It relies on compliance mandates. The main policy areas are Defense.

Who Benefits and How

The available clause analysis does not identify a specific beneficiary group.

Who Bears the Burden and How

No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.

Key Provisions

  • Adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 1. Exclusion of military bonuses Subsection (a) of section 134 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking any qualified military benefit and inserting...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for primary purpose and policy domains.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 1. Exclusion of military bonuses Subsection (a) of section 134 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking any qualified military benefit and inserting.

Key Policy Areas

Defense

Primary Purpose

The bill adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 1. Exclusion of military bonuses Subsection (a) of section 134 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking any qualified military benefit and inserting.

Policy Domains

Defense

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
May 20, 2025

Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia (for herself and Mr. Bishop) introduced …

Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Defense
Actor Mappings
"federal_implementing_agencies"
→ Federal agencies assigned duties by the bill

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology