HR3460-119

In Committee

AI Whistleblower Protection Act

119th Congress Introduced May 15, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The AI Whistleblower Protection Act defines AI security vulnerabilities, AI violations, artificial intelligence, emerging AI technology, covered individuals, and employers. Covered individuals include current and former employees and independent contractors. Employers are any compensated work recipients engaged in commerce or an industry affecting commerce. Employers may not discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, blacklist, harass, or otherwise discriminate in employment, post-employment, or contractor work terms because a covered individual lawfully reports an AI security vulnerability or AI violation, or reasonably believed vulnerability or violation, to an appropriate regulatory official, the Attorney General, a regulatory or law enforcement agency, Congress, a supervisor, or internal personnel with authority to investigate or address misconduct. Protected activity also includes initiating, testifying in, or assisting investigations or judicial or administrative actions. Aggrieved covered individuals may file Labor Department complaints under AIR21-style procedures or sue in federal district court if Labor has not issued a final decision within 180 days without bad-faith delay. Federal court actions allow jury trials, have six-year, three-year discovery, and 10-year outside limitations periods, and prevailing individuals receive reinstatement, double back pay with interest, compensatory damages including litigation costs, expert witness fees, and attorneys' fees, plus other appropriate remedies. Rights cannot be waived or altered by contracts, arbitration, mediation, policies, or employment conditions.

Who Benefits and How

AI employees benefit because they can report security vulnerabilities or legal violations without employer retaliation. AI contractors benefit because independent contractors and former contractors are covered. Regulators benefit from protected disclosures about AI public safety, public health, national security, and legal risks. Congressional committees benefit because disclosures to members or committees are protected.

Who Bears the Burden and How

AI employers must avoid retaliation against covered individuals who report AI vulnerabilities or violations. Labor Department whistleblower staff must process complaints using AIR21-style procedures. Federal courts may hear AI whistleblower suits when Labor misses the 180-day deadline. Employers that retaliate face reinstatement, double back pay, compensatory damages, litigation costs, expert fees, attorneys' fees, and other remedies.

Key Provisions

  • Defines AI security vulnerabilities, AI violations, covered individuals, emerging AI technology, and covered employers.
  • Prohibits retaliation for reporting AI vulnerabilities, AI violations, or reasonably believed misconduct to regulators, law enforcement, Congress, supervisors, or authorized internal personnel.
  • Allows Labor Department complaints and federal court actions after 180 days without a final Labor decision.
  • Provides jury trials, reinstatement, double back pay, compensatory damages, litigation costs, expert fees, attorneys' fees, and other remedies.
  • Prohibits waiver or alteration of rights through contracts, arbitration, mediation, policies, or employment conditions.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Protects employees, former employees, independent contractors, and former contractors from retaliation for reporting AI security vulnerabilities, AI legal violations, or substantial AI dangers to regulators, law enforcement, Congress, supervisors, or authorized internal personnel, with Labor complaints, federal court actions, jury trials, double back pay, compensatory damages, fees, and nonwaivable remedies.

Key Policy Areas

Artificial Intelligence, Whistleblowers, Labor

Primary Purpose

Protects employees, former employees, independent contractors, and former contractors from retaliation for reporting AI security vulnerabilities, AI legal violations, or substantial AI dangers to regulators, law enforcement, Congress, supervisors, or authorized internal personnel, with Labor complaints, federal court actions, jury trials, double back pay, compensatory damages, fees, and nonwaivable remedies.

Policy Domains

Artificial Intelligence Whistleblowers Labor

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • AI employees
  • AI contractors
  • Regulators
  • Congressional committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Regulators: ,
AI employees: ,
AI contractors: ,
Congressional committees: ,
Identified Costs
  • AI employers
  • Labor Department whistleblower staff
  • Federal courts
  • Employers that retaliate
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
AI employers: ,
Federal courts: ,
Employers that retaliate: ,
Labor Department whistleblower staff: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
May 15, 2025

Mr. Obernolte (for himself and Mr. Lieu) introduced the following …

May 15, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

May 15, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Technology
6 mentions across 2 clauses
+4 positive -2 negative

AI contractors, AI employees, AI employers

Positive-direction: AI contractors, AI employees

Negative-direction: AI employers

Government
4 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative ?2 uncertain

Labor Department whistleblower staff, Regulators

Labor
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Employers that retaliate

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Artificial Intelligence Whistleblowers Labor

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology