Empty Lots to Housing Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Empty Lots to Housing Act adds a title 23 provision for real property acquired with federal transportation assistance that is no longer needed for its original purpose. DOT may authorize transfer of the property, with no further obligation to the federal government, to a local governmental authority or nonprofit organization for transit-oriented dwelling units. DOT may also authorize transfer to a third-party entity if a local government or nonprofit cannot receive the property, the overall benefit of transfer outweighs the federal interest in selling the property after considering fair market value and other factors, and the third party has a satisfactory history of constructing or operating affordable housing. DOT may authorize transfer only if the recipient contractually requires the transferee, for 30 years, to reserve at least 40 percent of units developed on the property for families at or below 60 percent of area median income with rent not exceeding 30 percent of adjusted income, and to reserve at least 20 percent of those reserved units for families at or below 30 percent of area median income.
Who Benefits and How
Low-income renters benefit because transferred properties must reserve 40 percent of units for households at or below 60 percent of area median income. Very low-income families benefit because part of the reserved units must serve households at or below 30 percent of area median income. Local governments benefit from a pathway to convert unneeded transportation land into transit-oriented housing. Nonprofit housing developers benefit from access to surplus federally assisted transportation real estate.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Transportation grant recipients must impose 30-year affordability contracts before transferring property. DOT real estate staff must decide whether transfers meet federal-interest, fair-market-value, and affordable-housing history tests. Third-party developers must prove a satisfactory affordable housing record before receiving property when local governments or nonprofits cannot. Federal taxpayers may forgo sale proceeds when property transfers without further obligation to the government.
Key Provisions
- Authorizes transfer of unneeded federally assisted transportation property for transit-oriented dwelling units.
- Allows transfers to local governments, nonprofits, or qualified third parties when statutory tests are met.
- Requires 30-year affordability contracts for transferred property.
- Requires at least 40 percent of units to serve families at or below 60 percent of area median income.
- Requires part of the reserved units to serve families at or below 30 percent of area median income.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Lets recipients transfer federally assisted transportation real property that is no longer needed to local governments, nonprofits, or qualified third parties for transit-oriented housing, if 30-year affordability contracts reserve at least 40 percent of units for households at or below 60 percent of area median income and part of those for households at or below 30 percent.
Key Policy Areas
Housing, Transportation, Public Lands
Primary Purpose
Lets recipients transfer federally assisted transportation real property that is no longer needed to local governments, nonprofits, or qualified third parties for transit-oriented housing, if 30-year affordability contracts reserve at least 40 percent of units for households at or below 60 percent of area median income and part of those for households at or below 30 percent.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Low-income renters
- Very low-income families
- Local governments
- Nonprofit housing developers
Identified Costs
- Transportation grant recipients
- DOT real estate staff
- Third-party developers
- Federal taxpayers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Mullin (for himself and Mr. Edwards) introduced the following …
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Low-income renters, Nonprofit housing developers, Very low-income families
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology