To require the Director of the Bureau of Land Management to withdraw a rule of the Bureau of Land Management relating to conservation and landscape health.
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedAdditional sponsors: Ms. Boebert, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Duarte, …
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …
Mr. Curtis (for himself, Mr. Fulcher, Mr. Stewart, Ms. Hageman, …
Summary
What This Bill Does
Requires BLM to withdraw its proposed Conservation and Landscape Health rule and prohibits finalizing or implementing it or any similar rule.
Who Benefits and How
Ranchers and extractive industries avoid new conservation requirements. Western states maintain current land use patterns. Oil, gas, and mining interests avoid new restrictions.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Conservation groups lose landscape health protections. Public lands may face reduced environmental oversight. Wildlife and ecosystem management constrained.
Key Provisions
- Requires withdrawal of BLM proposed rule on conservation
- Prohibits finalizing, implementing, or enforcing the rule
- Bars any substantially similar rule
Evidence Chain:
This summary is derived from the structured analysis below. See "Detailed Analysis" for per-title beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
Primary Purpose
Withdraws and prohibits BLM conservation and landscape health rule
Policy Domains
Legislative Strategy
"Block BLM conservation rulemaking"
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "director"
- → BLM Director
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology