To require the Comptroller General of the United States to carry out a study of the costs associated with small- and medium-sized companies to undertake initial public offerings.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Middle Market IPO Cost Act directs the Comptroller General to study the costs small and medium-sized companies face when undertaking initial public offerings. GAO must consult with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. The study must consider direct and indirect IPO costs, including accountant fees, underwriter fees, outside-adviser fees, federal securities-law compliance, state securities-law compliance, and other IPO-related costs. GAO must compare IPO costs with alternative financing and liquidity options, analyze the impact of IPO costs on capital formation, and examine how those costs affect the availability of small and medium-sized public securities to retail investors. It also must review IPO trends over a period GAO chooses, including pricing practices, the number of IPOs, evolving costs for underwriters and investment advisers, the number of brokers and dealers active in underwriting, underwriter services before and after IPOs, research availability for smaller companies, and litigation costs of being public. GAO must report findings, determinations, and any administrative or legislative recommendations within 360 days.
Who Benefits and How
Small companies considering IPOs, medium-sized companies considering IPOs, retail investors seeking access to smaller public companies, capital-formation policymakers, House Financial Services Committee staff, Senate Banking Committee staff, IPO advisers, regional broker-dealers, and investment research providers benefit because the study could identify cost barriers, pricing practices, research gaps, litigation costs, and policy changes that make public offerings more feasible for middle-market issuers.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The Government Accountability Office, GAO financial-markets analysts, Securities and Exchange Commission staff, FINRA staff, investment banks underwriting IPOs, accounting firms serving IPO issuers, law firms advising issuers, brokers active in underwriting, and public-company litigation stakeholders bear burdens because they must supply data, support consultation, have fees and practices scrutinized, and respond to possible recommendations on IPO cost, research, pricing, and litigation reforms.
Key Provisions
- Requires GAO to study direct and indirect IPO costs for small and medium-sized companies.
- Requires consultation with the Securities and Exchange Commission and FINRA.
- Requires comparison of IPO costs with alternative financing and liquidity options.
- Requires analysis of capital-formation effects and retail-investor access to smaller-company public securities.
- Requires review of IPO pricing, underwriter activity, advisory costs, research availability, and public-company litigation costs.
- Requires a congressional report with findings and recommendations within 360 days.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires GAO, in consultation with the SEC and FINRA, to study direct and indirect IPO costs for small and medium-sized companies, compare IPO costs with alternative financing and liquidity options, analyze capital-formation and retail-investor effects, study underwriting and research trends, and report recommendations to Congress within 360 days.
Key Policy Areas
Financial Services, Capital Formation, Government Oversight
Primary Purpose
Requires GAO, in consultation with the SEC and FINRA, to study direct and indirect IPO costs for small and medium-sized companies, compare IPO costs with alternative financing and liquidity options, analyze capital-formation and retail-investor effects, study underwriting and research trends, and report recommendations to Congress within 360 days.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Small companies considering IPOs
- Medium-sized companies considering IPOs
- Retail investors seeking smaller public companies
- Capital-formation policymakers
- House Financial Services Committee staff
- Senate Banking Committee staff
- IPO advisers
- Regional broker-dealers
- Investment research providers
Identified Costs
- Government Accountability Office
- GAO financial-markets analysts
- Securities and Exchange Commission staff
- FINRA staff
- Investment banks underwriting IPOs
- Accounting firms serving IPO issuers
- Law firms advising issuers
- Brokers active in underwriting
- Public-company litigation stakeholders
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed HouseAdditional sponsors: Mr. Sessions and Mr. Lawler
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …
Passed House (inferred from eh version)
Mr. Himes introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
FINRA staff, Investment banks underwriting IPOs, Medium-sized companies considering IPOs
Government Accountability Office, Securities and Exchange Commission staff
Retail investors seeking smaller public companies
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "gao"
- → Comptroller General of the United States
- "sec"
- → Securities and Exchange Commission
- "finra"
- → Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology