HR3395-118

Reported

To direct the Chairman of the Federal Maritime Commission to seek to enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center to evaluate foreign ownership of marine terminals at the 15 largest United States container ports, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced May 17, 2023

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 27, 2023

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, …

Jul 18, 2023

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …

May 17, 2023

Mr. Auchincloss (for himself and Mr. Webster of Florida) introduced …

Summary

What This Bill Does

Directs the Federal Maritime Commission to commission a study on foreign ownership at the 15 largest US container ports. Examines Chinese and Russian ownership, federal grant recipients, and supply chain security implications.

Who Benefits and How

  • National security planners receive assessment of port ownership vulnerabilities
  • Congress gains information on foreign control of critical infrastructure
  • US supply chain security benefits from identification of risks

Who Bears the Burden and How

  • Federal Maritime Commission must contract with FFRDC for study
  • FFRDC conducts comprehensive ownership analysis
  • Foreign-owned terminals face increased scrutiny

Key Provisions

  • Study covers 10-year ownership changes at top 15 container ports
  • Tracks Chinese and Russian entity ownership
  • Reviews federal grant funds to foreign-owned facilities
  • Report due within 1 year with policy recommendations
Model: claude-opus-4
Generated: Jan 10, 2026 17:07

Evidence Chain:

This summary is derived from the structured analysis below. See "Detailed Analysis" for per-title beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

Primary Purpose

Requires study on foreign ownership of US container port marine terminals and economic security impacts

Policy Domains

Trade National Security Maritime

Legislative Strategy

"Assess foreign ownership risks at US ports to inform security policy"

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Trade National Security
Actor Mappings
"the_chairman"
→ FMC Chairman

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology