HR334-119

In Committee

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to establish technical and procedural standards for artificial or prerecorded voice systems created through generative artificial intelligence, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Jan 13, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill amends section 227(d)(3) of the Communications Act, the provision directing FCC technical and procedural standards for artificial or prerecorded telephone voice systems. It inserts language making clear that those standards include systems created through generative artificial intelligence, including voice cloning, and other later technologies that the FCC considers appropriate. The immediate legal effect is not a new consumer cause of action; it is a direction that FCC robocall and prerecorded-voice standards must encompass AI-generated voice technology.

Who Benefits and How

Telephone subscribers benefit because FCC robocall standards would explicitly cover AI-generated voices and voice cloning. Consumers targeted by voice-cloning scams benefit from clearer FCC authority to set technical and procedural safeguards for synthetic calls. State consumer protection enforcers benefit from a federal standard that recognizes generative AI voice systems within robocall rules. Voice service providers benefit from clearer FCC expectations for calls using artificial or prerecorded AI voices.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Telemarketers using AI voice systems must comply with standards that explicitly include generative AI and voice cloning. Voice cloning vendors face regulatory pressure when their tools are used in artificial or prerecorded telephone systems. FCC robocall staff must update or apply technical and procedural standards to AI-generated voice technologies. Call compliance teams must track future technologies that the FCC deems covered under section 227(d)(3).

Key Provisions

  • Expands Communications Act robocall standards to cover generative-AI voice systems.
  • Adds voice cloning as an example of covered artificial or prerecorded voice technology.
  • Authorizes FCC treatment of later technologies the Commission deems appropriate.
  • Requires call compliance programs to treat AI-generated telephone voices as covered by section 227(d)(3) standards.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires FCC technical and procedural standards for artificial or prerecorded telephone voice systems to cover generative-AI voice systems, including voice cloning and future technologies the Commission deems appropriate.

Key Policy Areas

Telecommunications, Artificial Intelligence, Consumer Protection

Primary Purpose

Requires FCC technical and procedural standards for artificial or prerecorded telephone voice systems to cover generative-AI voice systems, including voice cloning and future technologies the Commission deems appropriate.

Policy Domains

Telecommunications Artificial Intelligence Consumer Protection

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Telephone subscribers
  • Consumers targeted by voice-cloning scams
  • State consumer protection enforcers
  • Voice service providers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Telephone subscribers:
Voice service providers:
State consumer protection enforcers:
Consumers targeted by voice-cloning scams:
Identified Costs
  • Telemarketers using AI voice systems
  • Voice cloning vendors
  • FCC robocall staff
  • Call compliance teams
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
FCC robocall staff:
Call compliance teams:
Voice cloning vendors:
Telemarketers using AI voice systems:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 13, 2025

Mr. Allen introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Jan 13, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Jan 13, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Telecommunications
3 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive -1 negative

Telemarketers using AI voice systems, Telephone subscribers, Voice service providers

Positive-direction: Telephone subscribers, Voice service providers

Negative-direction: Telemarketers using AI voice systems

Consumers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Consumers targeted by voice-cloning scams

Technology
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Voice cloning vendors

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

FCC robocall staff

1/1
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Telecommunications Artificial Intelligence Consumer Protection

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology