HR3331-119

Reported

Mariner Exam Modernization Act

119th Congress Introduced May 13, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Mariner Exam Modernization Act amends title 46 section 7510, which governs review of merchant mariner credential examinations. It changes the existing exam review to a working group, extends the group formation period from 90 days to 180 days, and updates references to the new Act. It broadens the review from new questions to questions, content, and relevancy of the Merchant Mariner Credentialing Examination. The working group must include at least two individuals who took and passed the exam in the five years before the group is commissioned. The Coast Guard Commandant must conduct the review within 270 days and consider industry standards, practices, and technology; relevance of exam topics; redundancy between the credentialing exam and Standards of Training, Certification, and Watchkeeping competencies; and other listed factors. A report is required after completion.

Who Benefits and How

Merchant mariners seeking credentials benefit if the examination becomes more relevant to current industry standards and less redundant with STCW competencies. Recent mariner exam passers benefit because at least two people who passed the exam in the prior five years must be included in the working group. Maritime employers benefit if credentialing exams better reflect current practices and technology. Maritime training academies benefit from clearer signals about exam content and competency redundancy. The Coast Guard credentialing administration benefits from structured review findings that can guide examination updates.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Coast Guard credentialing administration must form the working group, broaden the review, and produce the report. The Commandant must evaluate exam relevance, redundancy, and industry standards within the new 270-day deadline. Working-group members must spend time reviewing exam questions and content. Maritime training institutions must adjust curricula if the review leads to updated examination content. Credentialing policy staff must update guidance and examination materials after the review.

Key Provisions

  • Establishes an examination working group instead of the prior exam-review structure.
  • Extends working-group formation from 90 days to 180 days.
  • Requires at least two recent exam passers to serve in the working group.
  • Expands review to exam questions, content, relevancy, industry standards, technology, and STCW redundancy.
  • Requires the Commandant to complete the review within 270 days and provide a report.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Modernizes Coast Guard merchant mariner credential examinations by extending the working-group timeline, adding recent exam passers to the review group, broadening review to question content and relevance, requiring review of industry standards and STCW redundancy, accelerating the review deadline to 270 days, and requiring a public report after completion.

Key Policy Areas

Maritime, Transportation, Workforce Licensing

Primary Purpose

Modernizes Coast Guard merchant mariner credential examinations by extending the working-group timeline, adding recent exam passers to the review group, broadening review to question content and relevance, requiring review of industry standards and STCW redundancy, accelerating the review deadline to 270 days, and requiring a public report after completion.

Policy Domains

Maritime Transportation Workforce Licensing

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Merchant mariners seeking credentials
  • Recent mariner exam passers
  • Maritime employers
  • Maritime training academies
  • Coast Guard credentialing administration
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Maritime employers:
Maritime training academies:
Recent mariner exam passers:
Merchant mariners seeking credentials:
Coast Guard credentialing administration:
Identified Costs
  • Coast Guard credentialing administration
  • Commandant of the Coast Guard
  • Working-group members
  • Maritime training institutions
  • Credentialing policy staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Working-group members:
Credentialing policy staff:
Commandant of the Coast Guard:
Maritime training institutions:
Coast Guard credentialing administration:

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 11, 2025

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: …

Jun 11, 2025

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Jun 11, 2025

Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Discharged

May 14, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.

May 13, 2025

Mr. Carbajal (for himself and Mr. Ezell) introduced the following …

May 13, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

May 13, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Transportation
3 mentions across 1 clause
+3 positive

Maritime employers, Merchant mariners seeking credentials, Recent mariner exam passers

Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

Coast Guard credentialing administration, Commandant of the Coast Guard

Education
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Maritime training academies

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Maritime Transportation Workforce Licensing
Actor Mappings
"commandant"
→ Commandant of the Coast Guard
"coast_guard"
→ Coast Guard

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology