HR3279-119

Introduced

To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to establish a limit for the total amount of additional unfunded regulatory costs that may be imposed in a fiscal year, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced May 8, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill establishes a comprehensive regulatory budgeting system requiring the Director of OMB to set annual caps on unfunded regulatory costs that federal agencies can impose, with Congressional approval required via joint. It relies on compliance mandates, reporting requirements, product standards, and exemptions. The main policy areas are Regulatory Reform, Finance, Healthcare, and Trade.

Who Benefits and How

Regulated industries across all sectors subject to federal regulations could face lower compliance burdens, Oil & gas industry facing environmental regulations could face lower compliance burdens, and Manufacturing sector facing environmental and safety regulations could face lower compliance burdens.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and OIRA would take on compliance duties, Federal regulatory agencies subject to regulatory budgeting limits (EPA, FDA, OSHA, SEC, FCC, DOL, etc.) would take on compliance duties, and Workers and labor unions who benefit from OSHA workplace safety regulations could face increased risk.

Key Provisions

  • Establishes a comprehensive regulatory budgeting system requiring the Director of OMB to set annual caps on unfunded regulatory costs that federal agencies can impose, with Congressional approval required via joint...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill establishes a comprehensive regulatory budgeting system requiring the Director of OMB to set annual caps on unfunded regulatory costs that federal agencies can impose, with Congressional approval required via joint.

Key Policy Areas

Regulatory Reform, Finance, Healthcare, Trade

Primary Purpose

The bill establishes a comprehensive regulatory budgeting system requiring the Director of OMB to set annual caps on unfunded regulatory costs that federal agencies can impose, with Congressional approval required via joint.

Policy Domains

Regulatory Reform Finance Healthcare Trade

Section 2 - Regulatory Budgeting

Identified Gains
  • Regulated industries across all sectors subject to federal regulations
  • Oil & gas industry facing environmental regulations
  • Manufacturing sector facing environmental and safety regulations
  • Healthcare providers and pharmaceutical companies facing FDA regulations
  • Financial services firms subject to SEC, CFTC, and banking regulations
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Oil & gas industry facing environmental regulations:
Manufacturing sector facing environmental and safety regulations:
Financial services firms subject to SEC, CFTC, and banking regulations:
Regulated industries across all sectors subject to federal regulations:
Healthcare providers and pharmaceutical companies facing FDA regulations:
Identified Costs
  • Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and OIRA
  • Federal regulatory agencies subject to regulatory budgeting limits (EPA, FDA, OSHA, SEC, FCC, DOL, etc.)
  • Workers and labor unions who benefit from OSHA workplace safety regulations
  • Environmental advocacy groups seeking stronger EPA regulations
  • Consumer protection advocates seeking stronger product safety and financial regulations
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and OIRA:
Environmental advocacy groups seeking stronger EPA regulations:
Workers and labor unions who benefit from OSHA workplace safety regulations:
Consumer protection advocates seeking stronger product safety and financial regulations:
Federal regulatory agencies subject to regulatory budgeting limits (EPA, FDA, OSHA, SEC, FCC, DOL, etc.):

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
May 8, 2025

Mr. Fallon (for himself, Mr. Comer, and Ms. Foxx) introduced …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Federal regulatory agencies subject to regulatory budgeting limits (EPA, FDA, OSHA, SEC, FCC, DOL, etc.)

Executive Office Of The President
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and OIRA

All Industries
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Regulated industries across all sectors subject to federal regulations

Manufacturing
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Manufacturing sector facing environmental and safety regulations

Oil & Gas
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Oil & gas industry facing environmental regulations

Financial Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Financial services firms subject to SEC, CFTC, and banking regulations

Healthcare
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Healthcare providers and pharmaceutical companies facing FDA regulations

Labor
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Workers and labor unions who benefit from OSHA workplace safety regulations

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Regulatory Reform Finance Healthcare Trade
Actor Mappings
"the_director"
→ Director of the Office of Management and Budget
"the_president"
→ President of the United States
"head_of_an_agency"
→ Head of any federal agency as defined in 5 USC 551(1)
"the_comptroller_general"
→ Comptroller General of the United States
"the_associate_administrator"
→ Associate Administrator for Regulatory Budgeting within OIRA

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

8 terms
"additional unfunded regulatory cost" §2(f)(1)

An unfunded regulatory cost that had not been required to be incurred by any individual or entity as a result of a Federal mandate imposed by rule on an individual or entity during any preceding fiscal year.

"agency" §2(f)(2)

Has the meaning given that term in section 551(1) of title 5, United States Code (broadly covers executive agencies, departments, and independent regulatory commissions).

"appropriate congressional committees" §2(f)(3)

The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate.

"cost" §2(f)(4)

A direct cost or a quantifiable cost that can be estimated using the methods and concepts described in Office of Management and Budget Circular A-4 issued on September 17, 2003.

"cumulative unfunded regulatory costs" §2(f)(5)

The aggregate amount of all unfunded regulatory costs imposed during all preceding fiscal years.

"Director" §2(f)(6)

The Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

"rule" §2(f)(7)

Has the meaning given such term in section 551 of title 5, United States Code (includes agency statements of general or particular applicability and future effect).

"unfunded regulatory cost" §2(f)(8)

A cost required to be incurred by an individual or entity as a result of a Federal mandate imposed by rule on an individual or entity.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology