Keeping Deposits Local Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Keeping Deposits Local Act changes how reciprocal deposits are treated under the brokered-deposit rules in section 29 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. The reported text creates tiered exemptions so a portion of an agent institution's reciprocal deposits is not treated as funds obtained through a deposit broker: 50 percent of liabilities up to $1 billion, 40 percent of liabilities between $1 billion and $10 billion, and 30 percent of liabilities between $10 billion and $250 billion. Earlier versions also included lower percentages for liabilities above $250 billion and expanded agent-institution eligibility to CAMELS-rated 1, 2, or 3 institutions. The bill requires the FDIC, in consultation with the Federal Reserve Board, to study reciprocal deposits, their use since 2018, stress-period performance, end-user depositors, comparisons to other deposit arrangements, and benefits and risks.
Who Benefits and How
Community banks benefit because reciprocal deposits below the smallest liability tier receive the largest brokered-deposit exclusion. Regional banks benefit from larger exempt reciprocal-deposit capacity across the $1 billion to $10 billion tier. Larger banks up to $250 billion in liabilities benefit from a 30 percent exclusion on that tier. Municipal depositors, business depositors, and nonprofit depositors benefit if local banks can place large deposits through reciprocal networks while keeping customer relationships local. Deposit-placement network providers benefit from increased bank demand for reciprocal-deposit products.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation must apply revised brokered-deposit calculations and complete a study and report to House Financial Services and Senate Banking. Federal Reserve Board staff must consult on the study. Bank examiners must evaluate reciprocal-deposit use under the revised thresholds and any agent-institution eligibility changes. Large banks above the covered tiers receive less proportional relief. The Federal Reserve discretionary surplus fund is reduced by $28 million in the version with the offset.
Key Provisions
- Establishes a 50 percent reciprocal-deposit exclusion for the portion of liabilities at or below $1 billion.
- Establishes a 40 percent exclusion for the portion above $1 billion and at or below $10 billion.
- Establishes a 30 percent exclusion for the portion above $10 billion and at or below $250 billion.
- Expands agent-institution eligibility in some versions to institutions most recently assigned CAMELS ratings of 1, 2, or 3.
- Requires the FDIC and Federal Reserve Board to study reciprocal deposits and report findings to Congress.
- Reduces the Federal Reserve discretionary surplus fund by $28 million in the offset version.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Expands the amount of reciprocal deposits excluded from brokered-deposit treatment under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, broadens agent-institution eligibility to banks with CAMELS ratings of 1, 2, or 3 in some versions, requires an FDIC reciprocal-deposits study, and offsets costs by reducing the Federal Reserve discretionary surplus fund.
Key Policy Areas
Banking, Financial Regulation, Community Finance
Primary Purpose
Expands the amount of reciprocal deposits excluded from brokered-deposit treatment under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, broadens agent-institution eligibility to banks with CAMELS ratings of 1, 2, or 3 in some versions, requires an FDIC reciprocal-deposits study, and offsets costs by reducing the Federal Reserve discretionary surplus fund.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Community bank managers
- Regional bank managers
- Large bank deposit officers
- Municipal depositors
- Business depositors
- Deposit-placement network providers
Identified Costs
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
- Federal Reserve Board staff
- Bank examiners
- Large banks above covered tiers
- Federal Reserve discretionary surplus fund
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, …
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3644-3645)
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3582-3584; text: …
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …
At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were …
Mr. Hill (AR) moved to suspend the rules and pass …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
CAMELS 3 rated banks, Community bank managers, Deposit-placement network providers
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Reserve Board staff
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "fed"
- → Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
- "fdic"
- → Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology