Financial Institution Regulatory Tailoring Enhancement Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Financial Institution Regulatory Tailoring Enhancement Act raises asset thresholds that trigger several Federal bank regulatory regimes. It amends Consumer Financial Protection Act section 1025 so CFPB supervision of larger insured depository institutions and credit unions applies at $50 billion instead of $10 billion, and the reported version updates section 1026 in the parallel smaller-institution framework. It raises the Bank Holding Company Act Volcker Rule-related threshold in section 13(h)(1)(B)(i) from $10 billion to $50 billion. It raises the Truth in Lending Act qualified-mortgage or ability-to-repay threshold cross-reference from $10 billion to $50 billion. It also raises a tailoring threshold in the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act from $10 billion to $50 billion.
Who Benefits and How
Mid-size banks with assets between $10 billion and $50 billion benefit because they can fall below regulatory thresholds that previously treated them like larger institutions. Credit unions in the $10 billion to $50 billion range benefit from reduced CFPB-supervision exposure. Regional bank holding companies benefit from a higher threshold in the Bank Holding Company Act provision. Mortgage compliance departments at covered banks benefit from a higher Truth in Lending Act threshold. Bank shareholders may benefit if compliance costs fall for institutions that move below the raised thresholds.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau loses direct supervisory reach over some institutions between $10 billion and $50 billion. Consumer borrowers may face higher risk if fewer mid-size institutions receive large-bank-style CFPB supervision. Federal banking regulators must adjust supervisory coordination and threshold calculations. State bank supervisors may carry more practical oversight responsibility for institutions no longer in the same Federal threshold category. Consumer advocacy organizations bear a policy burden because the bill narrows several regulatory triggers.
Key Provisions
- Amends the Consumer Financial Protection Act to replace $10 billion thresholds with $50 billion thresholds.
- Amends the Bank Holding Company Act Volcker-related threshold from $10 billion to $50 billion.
- Amends the Truth in Lending Act threshold from $10 billion to $50 billion.
- Amends an Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act tailoring threshold from $10 billion to $50 billion.
- Modifies CFPB supervisory coverage for institutions between $10 billion and $50 billion.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Raises several bank regulatory tailoring thresholds from $10 billion to $50 billion in the Consumer Financial Protection Act, Bank Holding Company Act, Truth in Lending Act, and Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act.
Key Policy Areas
Banking, Consumer Finance, Financial Regulation
Primary Purpose
Raises several bank regulatory tailoring thresholds from $10 billion to $50 billion in the Consumer Financial Protection Act, Bank Holding Company Act, Truth in Lending Act, and Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Mid-size banks
- Credit unions between asset thresholds
- Regional bank holding companies
- Mortgage compliance departments
- Bank shareholders
Identified Costs
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
- Consumer borrowers
- Federal banking regulators
- State bank supervisors
- Consumer advocacy organizations
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedAdditional sponsor: Mr. Sessions
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 132.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. …
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: …
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Mr. Barr (for himself and Mr. Meuser) introduced the following …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Credit unions between asset thresholds, Mid-size banks, Regional bank holding companies
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, State bank supervisors
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "cfpb"
- → Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology