To amend title V of the Public Health Service Act to direct the Center for Mental Health Services to develop and disseminate a strategy to address the effects of new technologies on children’s mental health.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill defines center for Mental Health Services strategy to address effects of new technologies on children’s mental health Section 520(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. It relies on definition changes. The main policy areas are Healthcare.
Who Benefits and How
Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill could face reduced risk.
Who Bears the Burden and How
No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.
Key Provisions
- Defines center for Mental Health Services strategy to address effects of new technologies on children’s mental health Section 520(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill defines center for Mental Health Services strategy to address effects of new technologies on children’s mental health Section 520(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
Key Policy Areas
Healthcare
Primary Purpose
The bill defines center for Mental Health Services strategy to address effects of new technologies on children’s mental health Section 520(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill
Sponsors
Bryan Steil
R-WI | Primary Sponsor
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Steil (for himself and Ms. Balint) introduced the following …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology