HR3157-119

Reported

State Energy Accountability Act

119th Congress Introduced May 1, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The State Energy Accountability Act adds a new Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act standard for States that implement intermittent energy policies. Each State regulatory authority with such a policy must conduct and make public a general evaluation of the policy's effects on the State bulk-power system, including a 10-year assessment of available electric energy resources. The evaluation must examine whether resources complying with the intermittent policy can meet demand during emergencies, high-demand periods, and extreme weather; effects on electric utility rates; whether reliable generation retired to comply with the policy can be replaced by sufficient generation with equivalent capacity accreditation; and whether the State must rely on out-of-state reliable generation to maintain reliability. The bill also directs State regulatory authorities to consider and make a determination on the standard notwithstanding ordinary PURPA timing provisions.

Who Benefits and How

Electricity consumers benefit from public information about reliability, rate, and emergency-demand effects of intermittent energy policies. Dispatchable power generators benefit because the evaluation highlights replacement capacity and equivalent capacity accreditation. Grid reliability planners benefit from a 10-year assessment of resource adequacy and out-of-state supply dependence. State legislators and utility commissioners benefit from a public record for energy-policy accountability. Electric utilities benefit from clearer analysis of rate effects and emergency reliability obligations.

Who Bears the Burden and How

State regulatory authorities must conduct and publish the evaluation and make a determination on the new standard. Renewable energy developers may face additional scrutiny if intermittent policies are shown to affect reliability, rates, or replacement capacity. State energy offices must supply data on resources, rates, emergencies, and out-of-state generation. Electric utilities must provide information needed for resource-adequacy and rate assessments. State officials supporting intermittent energy mandates bear political accountability for the published findings.

Key Provisions

  • Adds a PURPA standard for State regulatory authorities implementing intermittent energy policies.
  • Requires public evaluation of bulk-power reliability and 10-year resource adequacy.
  • Requires analysis of emergency demand, high-demand periods, and extreme weather performance.
  • Requires evaluation of electric utility rate effects and replacement capacity accreditation.
  • Requires analysis of reliance on out-of-state reliable generation and a State determination on the standard.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires State regulatory authorities implementing intermittent energy policies to publicly evaluate effects on bulk-power reliability, emergency demand, electric utility rates, replacement capacity, and out-of-state reliable generation needs, and to consider and determine the new PURPA standard despite ordinary timing rules.

Key Policy Areas

Energy, Electric Reliability, State Regulation

Primary Purpose

Requires State regulatory authorities implementing intermittent energy policies to publicly evaluate effects on bulk-power reliability, emergency demand, electric utility rates, replacement capacity, and out-of-state reliable generation needs, and to consider and determine the new PURPA standard despite ordinary timing rules.

Policy Domains

Energy Electric Reliability State Regulation

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Electricity consumers
  • Dispatchable power generators
  • Grid reliability planners
  • State legislators
  • Electric utilities
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
State legislators:
Electric utilities:
Electricity consumers:
Grid reliability planners:
Dispatchable power generators:
Identified Costs
  • State regulatory authorities
  • Renewable energy developers
  • State energy offices
  • Electric utilities
  • State officials supporting intermittent mandates
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Electric utilities:
State energy offices:
Renewable energy developers:
State regulatory authorities:
State officials supporting intermittent mandates:

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 17, 2025

Additional sponsor: Mr. Balderson

Sep 17, 2025

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the …

Sep 17, 2025

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 255.

Sep 17, 2025

Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. …

Jun 25, 2025

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Jun 25, 2025

Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 27 …

Jun 5, 2025

Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Jun 5, 2025

Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

Jun 3, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.

May 1, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Energy
10 mentions across 2 clauses
+6 positive -4 negative

Dispatchable power generators, Electric utilities, Electricity consumers

Positive-direction: Dispatchable power generators, Electricity consumers, Grid reliability planners

Negative-direction: Electric utilities, Renewable energy developers

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

State regulatory authorities

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Energy Electric Reliability State Regulation
Actor Mappings
"purpa"
→ Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act
"state_authority"
→ State regulatory authority

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology