HR3149-119

In Committee

App Store Accountability Act

119th Congress Introduced May 1, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The App Store Accountability Act creates a child online safety compliance regime for app stores with more than 5 million U.S. users. Covered app store providers must request and verify a user's age category at account creation, affiliate minor accounts with a verified parental account, obtain verifiable parental consent before minors download or buy apps or make in-app purchases, notify users and parents after significant app changes, share only age category and parental-consent status with developers, protect age-verification personal data with minimization and safeguards including encryption, display age ratings and content descriptions clearly when used, and provide real-time age-category and consent signals. App developers must use the app store signal, verify age category and consent before downloads, purchases, significant changes, or legal compliance requests, notify app stores of significant changes, avoid enforcing contracts against minors without verified parental consent, avoid misrepresenting parental consent disclosures, avoid sharing age-category data with unaffiliated third parties other than service providers or processors, and treat receipt of the signal as actual knowledge of age category. FTC must issue guidance within one year, review app store compliance policies within 30 days when requested, certify compliant providers for one year, receive complaints, and enforce violations as unfair or deceptive acts. State attorneys general may bring civil actions for injunctions, compliance, damages, restitution, and other relief, while the bill preempts state laws on age verification for app stores and app developers covered by the Act.

Who Benefits and How

Parents of minors benefit because app stores must obtain verifiable parental consent before minors download or purchase apps or make in-app purchases. Children using mobile apps benefit from age-category verification, consent rules, and limits on age-data sharing. Covered app store providers benefit from a federal preemption standard and FTC certification pathway once they build compliant systems. App developers benefit from safe harbor when they rely in good faith on app store age-verification data or their own compliant process. State attorneys general benefit from an explicit civil enforcement path for resident harms.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Covered app store providers must build age-verification, parental-account, consent, data-security, developer-signal, policy-review, and change-notice systems. App developers must verify age category, request consent signals, update disclosures, avoid certain data sharing, and modify contract enforcement against minors. FTC consumer protection staff must issue guidance, review compliance policies, certify providers, receive complaints, and enforce violations. State attorneys general must notify FTC and coordinate intervention rights when bringing actions. Adult users may bear privacy burdens from age-verification data collection even with minimization rules.

Key Provisions

  • Defines age categories for adults, teenagers, children, and young children plus covered app stores with more than 5 million U.S. users.
  • Requires covered app stores to verify age category, link minor accounts to parental accounts, obtain parental consent, secure age data, and provide real-time signals.
  • Requires app developers to use app store signals, notify significant changes, honor consent limits, and avoid sharing age-category data with unrelated third parties.
  • Directs FTC guidance, compliance certification, complaint review, and unfair-or-deceptive-act enforcement.
  • Authorizes state attorney general enforcement and preempts covered state age-verification requirements.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires large U.S. app stores to verify users' age categories, obtain parental consent for minors, share age-category signals with app developers, and subjects app stores and developers to FTC and state enforcement with a federal preemption rule.

Key Policy Areas

Technology, Consumer Protection, Child Online Safety

Primary Purpose

Requires large U.S. app stores to verify users' age categories, obtain parental consent for minors, share age-category signals with app developers, and subjects app stores and developers to FTC and state enforcement with a federal preemption rule.

Policy Domains

Technology Consumer Protection Child Online Safety

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Parents of minors
  • Children using mobile apps
  • Covered app store providers
  • App developers
  • State attorneys general
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
App developers: , , , , , , ,
Parents of minors: , , , , , , ,
State attorneys general: , , , , , , ,
Children using mobile apps: , , , , , , ,
Covered app store providers: , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Covered app store providers
  • App developers
  • FTC consumer protection staff
  • State attorneys general
  • Adult users
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Adult users: , , , , , , ,
App developers: , , , , , , ,
State attorneys general: , , , , , , ,
Covered app store providers: , , , , , , ,
FTC consumer protection staff: , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 11, 2025

Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.

Dec 11, 2025

Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

May 1, 2025

Mr. James (for himself and Mr. Bilirakis) introduced the following …

May 1, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade.

May 1, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

May 1, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Consumers
16 mentions across 8 clauses
-8 negative ?8 uncertain

Adult users, Parents of minors

Technology
16 mentions across 8 clauses
-16 negative

App developers, Covered app store providers

Government
16 mentions across 8 clauses
-8 negative ?8 uncertain

FTC consumer protection staff, State attorneys general

Individual And Family Services
8 mentions across 8 clauses
+8 positive

Children using mobile apps

8/11
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Technology Consumer Protection Child Online Safety

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology