Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Reauthorization Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Reauthorization Act strengthens the public-records process for unresolved civil-rights-era cases. It states that Federal, State, and local government records concerning civil rights cold cases should carry a presumption of immediate disclosure and eventually be disclosed so the public can understand the history surrounding those cases. It lets the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board reimburse State or local governments for digitizing, photocopying, or mailing civil rights cold case records to the Archivist for inclusion in the Collection. It removes an exception that had treated State or local government records differently, limits withholding for information in records created on or before January 1, 1990, and extends the Review Board's tenure from seven years to eleven years.
Who Benefits and How
Families of civil-rights cold-case victims benefit from a stronger disclosure presumption and a longer-running review process. Civil rights historians and researchers benefit because more Federal, State, and local records can be digitized, transmitted to the Archivist, and added to the public Collection. State archives and local records offices benefit from full reimbursement for digitizing, photocopying, and mailing qualifying records. The National Archives benefits from clearer authority to receive more records into the Collection. Civil rights communities benefit from broader access to records about unresolved violence and government responses.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board must process reimbursement requests, coordinate disclosure review, and operate for an extended eleven-year period. State archives and local records offices must identify, copy, digitize, mail, and transmit eligible records if they participate. The Archivist and National Archives staff must receive, manage, and preserve additional records. Agencies or offices seeking to withhold older information face a narrower legal pathway for records created on or before January 1, 1990.
Key Provisions
- Establishes a congressional sense that civil rights cold-case records should carry a presumption of immediate disclosure.
- Authorizes the Review Board to reimburse State or local governments for digitizing, photocopying, or mailing records to the Archivist.
- Removes special State or local government language from the disclosure provision.
- Limits withholding for information in civil rights cold-case records created on or before January 1, 1990.
- Extends the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board tenure from 7 years to 11 years.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Clarifies and extends the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board by reaffirming a presumption of disclosure for Federal, State, and local cold-case records, authorizing reimbursement of State and local transmission costs, narrowing withholding rules for older records, and extending the Board tenure from 7 years to 11 years.
Key Policy Areas
Civil Rights, Government Records, Oversight
Primary Purpose
Clarifies and extends the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board by reaffirming a presumption of disclosure for Federal, State, and local cold-case records, authorizing reimbursement of State and local transmission costs, narrowing withholding rules for older records, and extending the Board tenure from 7 years to 11 years.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Families of civil-rights cold-case victims
- Civil rights historians
- State archives
- Local records offices
- National Archives
Identified Costs
- Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board
- State archives
- Local records offices
- Archivist of the United States
- Record-holding agencies
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedOrdered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: …
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Mrs. Watson Coleman (for herself, Mr. Lawler, and Mr. Fitzpatrick) …
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board, Local records offices, National Archives
Positive-direction: Local records offices, State archives
Negative-direction: Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board, National Archives
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "archivist"
- → Archivist of the United States
- "review_board"
- → Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology