HR3062-119

Passed House

Promoting Cross-border Energy Infrastructure Act

119th Congress Introduced Apr 29, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Promoting Cross-border Energy Infrastructure Act replaces presidential-permit practice for covered energy border facilities with statutory agency approvals. A person seeking to construct, connect, operate, or maintain a border-crossing facility for oil, natural gas, or electric transmission would need a certificate of crossing. FERC would handle oil and natural-gas pipeline border-crossing facilities, while the Department of Energy would handle electric transmission border-crossing facilities. The reviewing agency must issue the certificate within 120 days after the final National Environmental Policy Act action unless the facility is not in the public interest. For electric transmission, the Secretary of Energy must also find consistency with Electric Reliability Organization policies and standards, the applicable regional entity, and any regional transmission organization or independent system operator with operational or functional control. The bill excludes existing operating facilities, facilities that already hold presidential permits, and pending presidential-permit applications during a transition period.

Who Benefits and How

Oil pipeline developers, natural-gas pipeline developers, cross-border electric transmission developers, natural-gas exporters to Canada, natural-gas exporters to Mexico, existing presidential-permit holders, utility interconnection planners, and energy infrastructure investors benefit because the bill creates a defined certificate process, a 120-day post-NEPA decision clock, a 30-day approval rule for Canada and Mexico natural-gas imports and exports under the Natural Gas Act, and statutory protection against unilateral presidential revocation of existing cross-border facility permits. Project sponsors also benefit because routine modifications do not need a new certificate unless they materially change the facility location or increase physical capacity.

Who Bears the Burden and How

FERC, the Department of Energy, Energy Department transmission reviewers, reliability organizations, regional entities, regional transmission organizations, independent system operators, environmental groups, landowner advocates, and communities opposing cross-border infrastructure bear burdens because the bill shifts approval work into agency certificate proceedings, imposes decision deadlines after NEPA review, narrows presidential-permit leverage, and may reduce opportunities to delay or revoke approved border facilities. FERC and DOE must still apply other federal statutes, but they lose open-ended presidential-permit discretion for the covered border-crossing segment.

Key Provisions

  • Creates a certificate of crossing for oil, natural-gas, and electric border-crossing facilities.
  • Assigns oil and natural-gas pipeline certificates to FERC and electric transmission certificates to the Energy Secretary.
  • Requires a certificate decision within 120 days after the final NEPA action unless the facility is not in the public interest.
  • Requires Canada and Mexico natural-gas import and export applications to be granted within 30 days after a complete application.
  • Repeals Federal Power Act section 202(e) and makes conforming changes to electricity-import authority.
  • Bars presidential-permit requirements for covered construction, connection, operation, or maintenance and bars presidential revocation of existing permits unless Congress authorizes it.
  • Exempts most modifications unless they materially change location or increase physical capacity.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a certificate-of-crossing regime for oil, natural-gas, and electric cross-border facilities; gives FERC and the Energy Department 120 days after NEPA review to act; fast-tracks Canada and Mexico natural-gas import and export approvals; eliminates presidential-permit requirements for covered border facilities; and limits presidential revocation of existing permits without an Act of Congress.

Key Policy Areas

Energy, Oil & Gas, Utilities

Primary Purpose

Creates a certificate-of-crossing regime for oil, natural-gas, and electric cross-border facilities; gives FERC and the Energy Department 120 days after NEPA review to act; fast-tracks Canada and Mexico natural-gas import and export approvals; eliminates presidential-permit requirements for covered border facilities; and limits presidential revocation of existing permits without an Act of Congress.

Policy Domains

Energy Oil & Gas Utilities

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Oil pipeline developers
  • Natural-gas pipeline developers
  • Cross-border electric transmission developers
  • Natural-gas exporters to Canada
  • Natural-gas exporters to Mexico
  • Existing presidential-permit holders
  • Utility interconnection planners
  • Energy infrastructure investors
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Oil pipeline developers: ,
Energy infrastructure investors: ,
Natural-gas exporters to Canada: ,
Natural-gas exporters to Mexico: ,
Natural-gas pipeline developers: ,
Utility interconnection planners: ,
Existing presidential-permit holders: ,
Cross-border electric transmission developers: ,
Identified Costs
  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
  • Department of Energy
  • Energy Department transmission reviewers
  • Reliability organizations
  • Regional transmission organizations
  • Independent system operators
  • Environmental groups
  • Landowner advocates
  • Communities opposing cross-border infrastructure
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Landowner advocates: ,
Department of Energy: ,
Environmental groups: ,
Reliability organizations: ,
Independent system operators: ,
Regional transmission organizations: ,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: ,
Energy Department transmission reviewers: ,
Communities opposing cross-border infrastructure: ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 19, 2025

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy …

Sep 19, 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Sep 19, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Sep 18, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Sep 18, 2025

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - …

Sep 18, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas …

Sep 18, 2025

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4442)

Sep 18, 2025

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. …

Sep 18, 2025

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Sep 18, 2025

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Oil & Gas
12 mentions across 3 clauses
?12 uncertain

Natural-gas exporters to Canada, Natural-gas exporters to Mexico, Natural-gas pipeline developers

Utilities
9 mentions across 3 clauses
-6 negative ?3 uncertain

Cross-border electric transmission developers, Independent system operators, Regional transmission organizations

Government
6 mentions across 3 clauses
-6 negative

Department of Energy, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Nonprofits
6 mentions across 3 clauses
?6 uncertain

Environmental groups, Landowner advocates

Energy
3 mentions across 3 clauses
?3 uncertain

Existing presidential-permit holders

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown
House Roll #277

On Passage

Promoting Cross-border Energy Infrastructure Act

Passed
224 Yea 203 Nay 5 Not Voting
Sep 18, 2025

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Energy Oil & Gas Utilities
Actor Mappings
"ferc"
→ Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
"secretary"
→ Secretary of Energy
"certificate_of_crossing"
→ agency certificate for covered energy border-crossing facilities

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology