HR3037-119

In Committee

Access to Breast Cancer Diagnosis Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Apr 28, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Access to Breast Cancer Diagnosis Act of 2025 adds Public Health Service Act section 2730. When a group health plan or health insurance issuer covers diagnostic or supplemental breast examinations, it may not impose deductibles, coinsurance, copayments, maximum limitations on those costs, or similar out-of-pocket expenses for those benefits. Diagnostic exams include medically necessary and appropriate diagnostic mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and similar exams consistent with National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines to evaluate an abnormality found on screening or another exam. Supplemental exams include medically necessary and appropriate breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and similar exams used to screen higher-risk individuals based on personal history, family history, or other risk factors even when no abnormality is suspected. Plans may still require timely prior authorization or appropriate utilization controls, and stronger state protections are preserved. The bill adds the new section to ACA grandfathered-plan rules, creates an Internal Revenue Code safe harbor so high deductible health plans do not lose status for covering these exams before the deductible, and applies the changes to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2026.

Who Benefits and How

Patients needing diagnostic breast exams benefit because covered exams cannot carry deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, or similar cost sharing. Higher-risk individuals needing supplemental breast screening benefit when family history, personal history, or other risk factors justify additional imaging. Breast cancer survivors benefit from lower out-of-pocket barriers to medically appropriate follow-up imaging. Clinicians ordering breast imaging benefit from clearer federal coverage rules tied to NCCN guidelines. State insurance regulators benefit because stronger state breast-exam protections are expressly preserved.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Group health plans must remove cost sharing for covered diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations. Health insurance issuers must update benefit designs, claims systems, and member materials before 2026 plan years. Employers sponsoring high deductible health plans may face higher premium or plan-cost pressure when exams are covered before the deductible. Plan utilization managers retain prior authorization authority but must apply it without cost-sharing barriers. The Treasury and HHS must administer the high-deductible-plan safe harbor and PHSA coverage requirement.

Key Provisions

  • Creates PHSA section 2730 barring cost sharing for covered diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations.
  • Defines diagnostic breast examinations by medical necessity, NCCN guidelines, and abnormality evaluation.
  • Defines supplemental breast examinations for higher-risk screening based on personal, family, or other risk factors.
  • Preserves timely prior authorization, appropriate utilization controls, and stronger State laws.
  • Provides a high-deductible-health-plan safe harbor for first-dollar breast-exam coverage beginning in 2026.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires group health plans and health insurance issuers to cover diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations without cost sharing for plan years beginning January 1, 2026.

Key Policy Areas

Healthcare, Insurance, Women's Health

Primary Purpose

Requires group health plans and health insurance issuers to cover diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations without cost sharing for plan years beginning January 1, 2026.

Policy Domains

Healthcare Insurance Women's Health

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Patients needing diagnostic breast exams
  • Higher-risk individuals needing supplemental breast screening
  • Breast cancer survivors
  • Clinicians ordering breast imaging
  • State insurance regulators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Breast cancer survivors: ,
State insurance regulators: ,
Clinicians ordering breast imaging: ,
Patients needing diagnostic breast exams: ,
Higher-risk individuals needing supplemental breast screening: ,
Identified Costs
  • Group health plans
  • Health insurance issuers
  • Employers sponsoring high deductible health plans
  • Plan utilization managers
  • Treasury Department
  • HHS
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
HHS: ,
Group health plans: ,
Treasury Department: ,
Health insurance issuers: ,
Plan utilization managers: ,
Employers sponsoring high deductible health plans: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 28, 2025

Mrs. Dingell (for herself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, and Ms. Wasserman Schultz) …

Apr 28, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in …

Apr 28, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Healthcare
8 mentions across 2 clauses
+8 positive

Breast cancer survivors, Clinicians ordering breast imaging, Higher-risk individuals needing supplemental breast screening

Financial Services
4 mentions across 2 clauses
-4 negative

Group health plans, Health insurance issuers

Business
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Employers sponsoring high deductible health plans

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

HHS

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Healthcare Insurance Women's Health

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology