HR3020-119

Introduced

To require the Government Accountability Office to evaluate the effects of anticompetitive contracting clauses in contracts between health insurers and health care providers and to determine actions taken by the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice relating to the use of such clauses in such contracts and to assess their ability to effectively enforce the Federal antitrust laws with respect to such use.

119th Congress Introduced Apr 24, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill expands a reporting req, compliance mandate, procurement provision: 2. GAO study and adds or tightens a compliance mandate, procurement, definition change provision: 3. Definitions. It relies on compliance mandates, procurement rules, reporting requirements, and definition changes. The main policy areas are Healthcare.

Who Benefits and How

The available clause analysis does not identify a specific beneficiary group.

Who Bears the Burden and How

No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.

Key Provisions

  • Expands a reporting req, compliance mandate, procurement provision: 2. GAO study.
  • Adds or tightens a compliance mandate, procurement, definition change provision: 3. Definitions.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for primary purpose and policy domains.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill expands a reporting req, compliance mandate, procurement provision: 2. GAO study and adds or tightens a compliance mandate, procurement, definition change provision: 3. Definitions.

Key Policy Areas

Healthcare

Primary Purpose

The bill expands a reporting req, compliance mandate, procurement provision: 2. GAO study and adds or tightens a compliance mandate, procurement, definition change provision: 3. Definitions.

Policy Domains

Healthcare

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 24, 2025

Mrs. Spartz introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Healthcare
Actor Mappings
"the_commission"
→ The commission identified in the operative section

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"anti-tiering clause" §H9D020C658ED042C7A6A6B06051A75347

a provision in a health care contract that— restricts the ability of a health insurance carrier or a health plan administrator to introduce or modify a tiered network plan or assign health care providers into tiers

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology