To reauthorize the Global Fragility Act of 2019, and for other purposes.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill expands a compliance mandate provision: 2. Annual Global Fragility Act Steering Committee Meeting on Policy Alignment Section 506 of the Global Fragility Act of 2019 (22 U.S.C. 9805) is amended— by striking Not later, expands a neutral technical change provision: 3. Reauthorization of the Prevention and Stabilization Fund Section 509(a) of the Global Fragility Act of 2019 (22 U.S.C. 9807(a)) is amended— in paragraph (2), by striking, and expands a neutral technical change provision: 4. Reauthorization of the Complex Crises Fund Section 509(b)(2) of the Global Fragility Act of 2019 (22 U.S.C. 9807) is amended by striking 2024 and inserting 2030. It relies on compliance mandates and appropriations. The main policy areas are Defense and Transportation.
Who Benefits and How
The available clause analysis does not identify a specific beneficiary group.
Who Bears the Burden and How
No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.
Key Provisions
- Expands a compliance mandate provision: 2. Annual Global Fragility Act Steering Committee Meeting on Policy Alignment Section 506 of the Global Fragility Act of 2019 (22 U.S.C. 9805) is amended— by striking Not later...
- Expands a neutral technical change provision: 3. Reauthorization of the Prevention and Stabilization Fund Section 509(a) of the Global Fragility Act of 2019 (22 U.S.C. 9807(a)) is amended— in paragraph (2), by striking...
- Expands a neutral technical change provision: 4. Reauthorization of the Complex Crises Fund Section 509(b)(2) of the Global Fragility Act of 2019 (22 U.S.C. 9807) is amended by striking 2024 and inserting 2030.
- Expands a appropriation provision: 5. Use of Economic Support Fund to support monitoring, evaluation, and learning activities Funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to carry out chapter 4...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for primary purpose and policy domains.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill expands a compliance mandate provision: 2. Annual Global Fragility Act Steering Committee Meeting on Policy Alignment Section 506 of the Global Fragility Act of 2019 (22 U.S.C. 9805) is amended— by striking Not later, expands a neutral technical change provision: 3. Reauthorization of the Prevention and Stabilization Fund Section 509(a) of the Global Fragility Act of 2019 (22 U.S.C. 9807(a)) is amended— in paragraph (2), by striking, and expands a neutral technical change provision: 4. Reauthorization of the Complex Crises Fund Section 509(b)(2) of the Global Fragility Act of 2019 (22 U.S.C. 9807) is amended by striking 2024 and inserting 2030.
Key Policy Areas
Defense, Transportation
Primary Purpose
The bill expands a compliance mandate provision: 2. Annual Global Fragility Act Steering Committee Meeting on Policy Alignment Section 506 of the Global Fragility Act of 2019 (22 U.S.C. 9805) is amended— by striking Not later, expands a neutral technical change provision: 3. Reauthorization of the Prevention and Stabilization Fund Section 509(a) of the Global Fragility Act of 2019 (22 U.S.C. 9807(a)) is amended— in paragraph (2), by striking, and expands a neutral technical change provision: 4. Reauthorization of the Complex Crises Fund Section 509(b)(2) of the Global Fragility Act of 2019 (22 U.S.C. 9807) is amended by striking 2024 and inserting 2030.
Policy Domains
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMs. Jacobs (for herself and Mr. McCaul) introduced the following …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "the_administrator"
- → The Administrator identified in the operative section
- "secretary_of_defense"
- → Secretary of Defense
- "secretary_of_treasury"
- → Secretary of the Treasury
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology