HR2988-119

Reported

Protecting Prudent Investment of Retirement Savings Act

119th Congress Introduced Apr 24, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Protecting Prudent Investment of Retirement Savings Act is a multi-part ERISA bill aimed at retirement-plan investment governance. The Increase Retirement Earnings Act division requires fiduciaries to base investment decisions solely on pecuniary factors, with a limited documented tiebreaker for otherwise indistinguishable options, and prevents non-pecuniary factors from serving as the basis for qualified default investment alternatives. The No Discrimination in My Benefits Act division requires fiduciaries to select, monitor, and retain plan fiduciaries, counsel, employees, and service providers without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Retirement Proxy Protection Act division requires fiduciaries managing shareholder rights, including proxy voting, to act solely in the economic interest of participants and beneficiaries and to document proxy-voting decisions and authority. The Providing Complete Information to Retirement Investors Act division requires notices and acknowledgments before brokerage-window transactions and requires a GAO return-comparison study.

Who Benefits and How

Traditional asset managers benefit because retirement fiduciaries are steered toward financial-return criteria rather than ESG or other non-pecuniary objectives. Fossil fuel companies benefit if retirement plans and proxy voters become less likely to screen investments or shareholder votes for climate or ESG goals. Companies facing ESG shareholder proposals benefit from restrictions on retirement-plan proxy voting for non-economic objectives. Fiduciary-selected investment funds benefit if brokerage-window disclosures make self-directed alternatives less convenient. Service providers previously excluded on non-merit grounds benefit from restrictions on race, color, religion, sex, or national-origin considerations in plan service-provider selection.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Retirement plan fiduciaries must document pecuniary-factor decisions, tiebreaker uses, proxy-voting authority, proxy decisions, brokerage-window notices, and service-provider selection criteria. ESG-focused investment funds and ESG advocacy organizations lose leverage in retirement-plan investment menus and proxy voting. Proxy advisory firms and investment managers delegated proxy authority face economic-interest documentation duties when advising or voting for ERISA plans. Plan administrators and recordkeepers must deliver brokerage-window warnings and projected-balance notices each time participants direct money into, out of, or within non-designated investment arrangements. Minority-owned financial service firms may lose diversity-focused selection preferences if those preferences are treated as barred service-provider factors.

Key Provisions

  • Requires ERISA fiduciaries to base investment decisions solely on pecuniary factors and document limited non-pecuniary tiebreakers.
  • Bars non-pecuniary factors from serving as the basis for qualified default investment alternatives.
  • Requires plan service-provider selection, monitoring, and retention without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
  • Requires proxy voting and shareholder-right decisions to be made solely in the economic interest of plan participants and beneficiaries.
  • Requires brokerage-window notices and participant acknowledgments before each transaction involving non-designated investment arrangements.
  • Requires a GAO study comparing returns from brokerage-window arrangements available in defined contribution plans.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Amends ERISA to restrict retirement plan fiduciaries to pecuniary investment factors, bar race, color, religion, sex, or national-origin considerations in service-provider selection, impose economic-interest and documentation rules on proxy voting and shareholder rights, require repeated brokerage-window risk acknowledgments and projected-balance disclosures, and require a GAO study comparing brokerage-window returns.

Key Policy Areas

Retirement, Employee Benefits, Investment Management, Corporate Governance

Primary Purpose

Amends ERISA to restrict retirement plan fiduciaries to pecuniary investment factors, bar race, color, religion, sex, or national-origin considerations in service-provider selection, impose economic-interest and documentation rules on proxy voting and shareholder rights, require repeated brokerage-window risk acknowledgments and projected-balance disclosures, and require a GAO study comparing brokerage-window returns.

Policy Domains

Retirement Employee Benefits Investment Management Corporate Governance

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Traditional asset managers
  • Fossil fuel companies
  • Companies facing ESG shareholder proposals
  • Fiduciary-selected investment funds
  • Service providers previously excluded on non-merit grounds
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Fossil fuel companies: , , , , , , ,
Traditional asset managers: , , , , , , ,
Fiduciary-selected investment funds: , , , , , , ,
Companies facing ESG shareholder proposals: , , , , , , ,
Service providers previously excluded on non-merit grounds: , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Retirement plan fiduciaries
  • ESG-focused investment funds
  • ESG advocacy organizations
  • Proxy advisory firms
  • Investment managers delegated proxy authority
  • Plan administrators
  • Recordkeepers for retirement plans
  • Minority-owned financial service firms
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Plan administrators: , , , , , , ,
Proxy advisory firms: , , , , , , ,
ESG advocacy organizations: , , , , , , ,
Retirement plan fiduciaries: , , , , , , ,
ESG-focused investment funds: , , , , , , ,
Recordkeepers for retirement plans: , , , , , , ,
Minority-owned financial service firms: , , , , , , ,
Investment managers delegated proxy authority: , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 26, 2026

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Jan 26, 2026

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, …

Jan 15, 2026

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Jan 15, 2026

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Jan 15, 2026

On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: …

Jan 15, 2026

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas …

Jan 15, 2026

The previous question was ordered on the amendment and the …

Jan 15, 2026

The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered …

Jan 15, 2026

Ms. Kaptur moved to recommit to the Committee on Education …

Jan 15, 2026

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 988, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Labor
38 mentions across 16 clauses
+8 positive -19 negative ?11 uncertain

Plan administrators, Plan fiduciaries with diversity-focused procurement, Plan participants

Positive-direction: Plan participants using brokerage windows, Service providers previously excluded on non-merit grounds

Negative-direction: Plan administrators, Plan fiduciaries with diversity-focused procurement, Recordkeepers for retirement plans, Retirement plan fiduciaries

Financial Services
25 mentions across 13 clauses
+12 positive -12 negative ?1 uncertain

Brokerage window providers, ESG-focused investment funds, Fiduciary-selected investment funds

Positive-direction: Fiduciary-selected investment funds, Traditional asset managers

Negative-direction: Brokerage window providers, ESG-focused investment funds

Energy
8 mentions across 8 clauses
+8 positive

Fossil fuel companies

Finance
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Minority-owned financial service firms

Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -1 negative

Congress, Government Accountability Office

Positive-direction: Congress

Negative-direction: Government Accountability Office

1/10
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Retirement Employee Benefits Investment Management Corporate Governance
Actor Mappings
"gao"
→ Government Accountability Office
"erisa"
→ Employee Retirement Income Security Act

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology