HR2986-119

In Committee

Expediting Generator Interconnection Procedures Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Apr 24, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Expediting Generator Interconnection Procedures Act directs the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to revisit how public utilities process interconnection requests for generation and energy storage projects. The rulemaking must address existing inefficiencies so projects can interconnect quickly, cost-effectively, and reliably. It must revise the pro forma Large Generator Interconnection Procedures and, where appropriate, the Large Generator Interconnection Agreement, requiring transmission providers to use resource-specific modeling assumptions based on actual operating practices, study requests in a way consistent with the interconnection customer's risk tolerance, select cost-effective network-reliability solutions, explain assumptions and solutions to customers, use queue-management best practices such as advanced computing, automation, and standardized study criteria, and improve transparency and performance for network-upgrade construction. FERC must start the rulemaking within 180 days and finish a final rule within 18 months, while leaving transmission cost allocation under existing section 205 ratemaking authority.

Who Benefits and How

Generation project developers benefit because interconnection studies would be pushed toward faster, more transparent, and more cost-conscious processing. Energy storage developers benefit because batteries, pumped hydropower, hydrogen storage, thermal storage, flywheels, and similar technologies are expressly covered. Interconnection customers benefit from better information about modeling assumptions, network-upgrade solutions, and study criteria. Electric customers benefit indirectly if faster interconnection brings lower-cost or reliability-supporting resources onto the grid sooner.

Who Bears the Burden and How

FERC must initiate and complete a rulemaking on a fixed timeline. Transmission providers must revise study practices, queue management, customer communications, and network-upgrade transparency. Public utilities may face compliance costs from new modeling, automation, and performance-enhancing measures. Projects needing network upgrades still remain subject to existing cost-allocation rules under FERC ratemaking authority.

Key Provisions

  • Directs FERC to initiate an interconnection rulemaking within 180 days.
  • Requires a final rule within 18 months after enactment.
  • Requires resource-specific modeling, risk-tolerance alignment, cost-effective reliability solutions, and customer-facing transparency.
  • Promotes advanced computing, automation, standardized study criteria, and timely construction of network upgrades.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires FERC to initiate, within 180 days, a rulemaking to speed generator and energy storage interconnection procedures and to issue a final rule within 18 months.

Key Policy Areas

Energy, Electric Grid, Rulemaking

Primary Purpose

Requires FERC to initiate, within 180 days, a rulemaking to speed generator and energy storage interconnection procedures and to issue a final rule within 18 months.

Policy Domains

Energy Electric Grid Rulemaking

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Generation project developers
  • Energy storage developers
  • Interconnection customers
  • Electric customers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Electric customers: ,
Energy storage developers: ,
Interconnection customers: ,
Generation project developers: ,
Identified Costs
  • FERC
  • Transmission providers
  • Public utilities
  • Projects needing network upgrades
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
FERC: ,
Public utilities: ,
Transmission providers: ,
Projects needing network upgrades: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 24, 2025

Ms. Castor of Florida introduced the following bill; which was …

Apr 24, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Apr 24, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Energy
6 mentions across 2 clauses
+6 positive

Energy storage developers, Generation project developers, Interconnection customers

Utilities
4 mentions across 2 clauses
-4 negative

Public utilities, Transmission providers

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

FERC

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Energy Electric Grid Rulemaking

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology