HR2952-118

Introduced

To amend the Federal Rules of Evidence to limit the admissibility of evidence of a defendant’s creative or artistic expression against such defendant, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Apr 27, 2023

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill provides limitation on admissibility of defendant’s creative or artistic expression Article IV of the Federal Rules of Evidence is amended by adding at the end the following: Rule 416 and provides rule 416. Limitation on admissibility of defendant’s creative or artistic expression. Except as provided in subsection (b), evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic expression, whether original. It relies on definition changes, appropriations, compliance mandates, and product standards. The main policy areas are Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.

Who Benefits and How

Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could see lower costs and Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities could gain revenue opportunities.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties and Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities could lose revenue opportunities.

Key Provisions

  • Provides limitation on admissibility of defendant’s creative or artistic expression Article IV of the Federal Rules of Evidence is amended by adding at the end the following: Rule 416.
  • Provides rule 416. Limitation on admissibility of defendant’s creative or artistic expression. Except as provided in subsection (b), evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic expression, whether original...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill provides limitation on admissibility of defendant’s creative or artistic expression Article IV of the Federal Rules of Evidence is amended by adding at the end the following: Rule 416 and provides rule 416. Limitation on admissibility of defendant’s creative or artistic expression. Except as provided in subsection (b), evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic expression, whether original.

Key Policy Areas

Law Enforcement, Criminal Justice

Primary Purpose

The bill provides limitation on admissibility of defendant’s creative or artistic expression Article IV of the Federal Rules of Evidence is amended by adding at the end the following: Rule 416 and provides rule 416. Limitation on admissibility of defendant’s creative or artistic expression. Except as provided in subsection (b), evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic expression, whether original.

Policy Domains

Law Enforcement Criminal Justice

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
  • Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities:
Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause: ,
Identified Costs
  • Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
  • Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities:
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause: ,

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 27, 2023

Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Bowman, Mr. Thompson …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Law Enforcement
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -1 negative

Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities

Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities faces effects in multiple directions

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Law Enforcement Criminal Justice

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology