HR2893-119

Introduced

To withdraw certain Bureau of Land Management land from mineral development.

119th Congress Introduced Apr 10, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 2. Withdrawal Subject to valid existing rights, the Federal land described in subsection (b) is withdrawn from all forms of— location, entry, and patent under the mining. It relies on compliance mandates. The main policy areas are Civil Rights.

Who Benefits and How

The available clause analysis does not identify a specific beneficiary group.

Who Bears the Burden and How

No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.

Key Provisions

  • Adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 2. Withdrawal Subject to valid existing rights, the Federal land described in subsection (b) is withdrawn from all forms of— location, entry, and patent under the mining...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for primary purpose and policy domains.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 2. Withdrawal Subject to valid existing rights, the Federal land described in subsection (b) is withdrawn from all forms of— location, entry, and patent under the mining.

Key Policy Areas

Civil Rights

Primary Purpose

The bill adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 2. Withdrawal Subject to valid existing rights, the Federal land described in subsection (b) is withdrawn from all forms of— location, entry, and patent under the mining.

Policy Domains

Civil Rights

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 10, 2025

Ms. Stansbury (for herself, Mr. Huffman, and Ms. Leger Fernandez) …

Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Civil Rights
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ The Secretary identified in the operative section

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology